An Electrical Structure-Based Approach to PMU Placement in the Electric Power Grid

The phasor measurement unit (PMU) placement problem is revisited by taking into account a stronger characterization of the electrical connectedness between various buses in the grid. To facilitate this study, the placement problem is approached from the perspective of the \emph{electrical structure} which, unlike previous work on PMU placement, accounts for the sensitivity between power injections and nodal phase angle differences between various buses in the power network. The problem is formulated as a binary integer program with the objective to minimize the number of PMUs for complete network observability in the absence of zero injection measurements. The implication of the proposed approach on static state estimation and fault detection algorithms incorporating PMU measurements is analyzed. Results show a significant improvement in the performance of estimation and detection schemes by employing the electrical structure-based PMU placement compared to its topological counterpart. In light of recent advances in the electrical structure of the grid, our study provides a more realistic perspective of PMU placement in the electric power grid.

[1]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Structured Total Maximum Likelihood: An Alternative to Structured Total Least Squares , 2010, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl..

[2]  Réka Albert,et al.  Structural vulnerability of the North American power grid. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  A. Abur,et al.  Observability analysis and measurement placement for systems with PMUs , 2004, IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition, 2004..

[4]  Franz Franchetti,et al.  An Information-Theoretic Approach to PMU Placement in Electric Power Systems , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[5]  B. Gou,et al.  Generalized Integer Linear Programming Formulation for Optimal PMU Placement , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Introduction to Total Least Squares and Errors-In-Variables Modeling , 2002 .

[7]  T. Baldwin,et al.  Power system observability with minimal phasor measurement placement , 1993 .

[8]  Rick S. Blum,et al.  A PMU Scheduling Scheme for Transmission of Synchrophasor Data in Electric Power Systems , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[9]  C. Wu Synchronization in networks of nonlinear dynamical systems coupled via a directed graph , 2005 .

[10]  R D Zimmerman,et al.  MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  Seth Blumsack,et al.  Comparing the Topological and Electrical Structure of the North American Electric Power Infrastructure , 2011, IEEE Systems Journal.

[12]  Jürgen Jost,et al.  Synchronization of networks with prescribed degree distributions , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[13]  Greg Welch,et al.  Optimal PMU placement evaluation for power system dynamic state estimation , 2010, 2010 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT Europe).

[14]  A. Abur,et al.  Placement of PMUs to Enable Bad Data Detection in State Estimation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  K. Shih,et al.  Application of a Robust Algorithm for Dynamic State Estimation of a Power System , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[16]  Shyh-Jier Huang,et al.  Application of a Robust Algorithm for Dynamic State Estimation of a Power System , 2002 .

[17]  A.G. Phadke,et al.  Phasor measurement unit placement techniques for complete and incomplete observability , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[18]  Ami Wiesel,et al.  Linear Regression With Gaussian Model Uncertainty: Algorithms and Bounds , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[19]  Ami Wiesel,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation in linear models with a Gaussian model matrix , 2006, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[20]  M. Begovic,et al.  Nondominated sorting genetic algorithm for optimal phasor measurement placement , 2002, 2003 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37491).

[21]  Vassilis Kekatos,et al.  Optimal Placement of Phasor Measurement Units via Convex Relaxation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[22]  L. Chua,et al.  Synchronization in an array of linearly coupled dynamical systems , 1995 .

[23]  M. Vidyasagar,et al.  Bad Data Rejection Properties of Weughted Least Absolute Value Techniques Applied to Static State Estimation , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[24]  A. G. Expósito,et al.  Power system state estimation : theory and implementation , 2004 .

[25]  Florian Dörfler,et al.  Synchronization and transient stability in power networks and non-uniform Kuramoto oscillators , 2009, Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference.

[26]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Total least squares and errors-in-variables modeling , 2007, Signal Process..

[27]  Ami Wiesel,et al.  Change detection in smart grids using errors in variables models , 2012, 2012 IEEE 7th Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM).

[28]  A.G. Phadke,et al.  An Alternative for Including Phasor Measurements in State Estimators , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[29]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .

[30]  Christian Posse,et al.  Evaluating North American Electric Grid Reliability Using the Barabasi-Albert Network Model , 2004, nlin/0408052.

[31]  Ali Mohammad Ranjbar,et al.  Optimal PMU Placement by an Equivalent Linear Formulation for Exhaustive Search , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[32]  M. Randic,et al.  Resistance distance , 1993 .

[33]  M. Begovic,et al.  Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Optimal Phasor Maesurement Placement , 2002 .

[34]  B. Gou Optimal Placement of PMUs by Integer Linear Programming , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.