Computational Aesthetic Evaluation of Logos

Computational aesthetics has become an active research field in recent years, but there have been few attempts in computational aesthetic evaluation of logos. In this article, we restrict our study on black-and-white logos, which are professionally designed for name-brand companies with similar properties, and apply perceptual models of standard design principles in computational aesthetic evaluation of logos. We define a group of metrics to evaluate some aspects in design principles such as balance, contrast, and harmony of logos. We also collect human ratings of balance, contrast, harmony, and aesthetics of 60 logos from 60 volunteers. Statistical linear regression models are trained on this database using a supervised machine-learning method. Experimental results show that our model-evaluated balance, contrast, and harmony have highly significant correlation of over 0.87 with human evaluations on the same dimensions. Finally, we regress human-evaluated aesthetics scores on model-evaluated balance, contrast, and harmony. The resulted regression model of aesthetics can predict human judgments on perceived aesthetics with a high correlation of 0.85. Our work provides a machine-learning-based reference framework for quantitative aesthetic evaluation of graphic design patterns and also the research of exploring the relationship between aesthetic perceptions of human and computational evaluation of design principles extracted from graphic designs.

[1]  Yan Ke,et al.  The Design of High-Level Features for Photo Quality Assessment , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[2]  Xianjun Sam Zheng,et al.  Subset Search for Icons of Different Spatial Frequencies , 2009 .

[3]  P. Fishwick Chapter 21 – Aesthetic Computing* , 2017 .

[4]  Babak Saleh,et al.  Learning style similarity for searching infographics , 2015, Graphics Interface.

[5]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[6]  Wen-Hung Liao,et al.  Analysis of Visual Elements in Logo Design , 2014, Smart Graphics.

[7]  Werner Dubitzky,et al.  Fundamentals of Data Mining in Genomics and Proteomics , 2009 .

[8]  Mongi A. Abidi,et al.  Shape analysis algorithm based on information theory , 2003, Proceedings 2003 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.03CH37429).

[9]  Kang Zhang,et al.  Rule-Based Automatic Generation of Logo Designs , 2017, Leonardo.

[10]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[11]  Wang Qingbin Statistical analysis on the enterprise logo color designs of global 500 , 2009, 2009 IEEE 10th International Conference on Computer-Aided Industrial Design & Conceptual Design.

[12]  Nuria Oliver,et al.  Towards Category-Based Aesthetic Models of Photographs , 2012, MMM.

[13]  Nicu Sebe,et al.  Affective Analysis of Professional and Amateur Abstract Paintings Using Statistical Analysis and Art Theory , 2015, ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst..

[14]  Diego Gutierrez,et al.  A similarity measure for illustration style , 2014, ACM Trans. Graph..

[15]  Mateu Sbert,et al.  Aesthetic Appraisal of Art - from Eye Movements to Computers , 2009, CAe.

[16]  Aaron Hertzmann,et al.  Exploratory font selection using crowdsourced attributes , 2014, ACM Trans. Graph..

[17]  Joseph A. Cote,et al.  Guidelines for Selecting or Modifying Logos , 1998 .

[18]  Edwin Lughofer,et al.  Modeling human aesthetic perception of visual textures , 2008, ACM Trans. Appl. Percept..

[19]  Philip Galanter,et al.  Computational aesthetic evaluation: steps towards machine creativity , 2012, SIGGRAPH '12.

[20]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Reduced-Reference Image Quality Assessment Using Divisive Normalization-Based Image Representation , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[21]  Kok-Lim Low,et al.  Saliency-enhanced image aesthetics class prediction , 2009, 2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[22]  F. Attneave Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[23]  M. Bar,et al.  Humans Prefer Curved Visual Objects , 2006, Psychological science.

[24]  N. H. C. Yung,et al.  Curvature scale space corner detector with adaptive threshold and dynamic region of support , 2004, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004..

[25]  Tsuhan Chen,et al.  > Replace This Line with Your Paper Identification Number (double-click Here to Edit) < , 2022 .

[26]  Duncan Cramer,et al.  Quantitative Data Analysis with IBM SPSS 17, 18 & 19: A Guide for Social Scientists , 2011 .

[27]  Ishani Chakraborty,et al.  Correlating low-level image statistics with users - rapid aesthetic and affective judgments of web pages , 2009, CHI.

[28]  Vicente Ordonez,et al.  High level describable attributes for predicting aesthetics and interestingness , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[29]  Katharina Reinecke,et al.  Predicting users' first impressions of website aesthetics with a quantification of perceived visual complexity and colorfulness , 2013, CHI.

[30]  Diego Gutierrez,et al.  Icon Set Selection via Human Computation , 2016, PG.

[31]  Florian Hönig Defining Computational Aesthetics , 2005, CAe.

[32]  J. Feldman,et al.  Information along contours and object boundaries. , 2005, Psychological review.