Prosodic influences on the resolution of temporary ambiguity during on-line sentence processing

We present three experiments designed to investigate the role of prosody during sentence processing. The first investigated the question of whether an utterance's prosodic contour influences its comprehension on-line. We spliced the beginning and end portions of direct object and embedded clause sentences and observed the consequent effects on comprehension using a dual-task procedure to measure processing load. Our second experiment sought to determine-whether the constituent structure of these sentences could be reliably predicted using prosodic information. We found that the duration and F0 contour associated with the main-clause verb and the following NP reliably distinguished between the direct object and embedded clause constructions. In the final experiment, we manipulated the duration of the main-clause verb and found that subjects used this information to guide their initial parse during on-line sentence comprehension. The need for a model of sentence processing that addresses the use of prosodic information is discussed.

[1]  D. Swinney,et al.  Inference Generation During Auditory Language Comprehension , 1990 .

[2]  D. Klatt.  Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  D. Klatt.  Vowel Lengthening is Syntactically Determined in a Connected Discourse. , 1975 .

[4]  Mari Ostendorf,et al.  The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation , 1991 .

[5]  J Grimshaw,et al.  Verb processing during sentence comprehension: Contextual impenetrability , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[6]  I. Lehiste.  Phonetic Disambiguation of Syntactic Ambiguity , 1973 .

[7]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992,45A (1) 73-87 Prosodic Effects in Minimal Attachment , 2022 .

[8]  J. Hart,et al.  Intonation by rule: a perceptual quest , 1973 .

[9]  Cheryl M. Beach,et al.  The interpretation of prosodic patterns at points of syntactic structure ambiguity: Evidence for cue trading relations☆ , 1991 .

[10]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure , 1984 .

[11]  Colin W. Wightman,et al.  Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Julie E. Boland,et al.  The use of lexical knowledge in sentence processing , 1991 .

[13]  Richard Berkovits,et al.  Utterance final lengthening and the duration of final-stop closures , 1993 .

[14]  D. Scott,et al.  Duration as a cue to the perception of a phrase boundary. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Lewis P. Shapiro,et al.  Preferences for a Verb′s Complements and Their Use in Sentence Processing , 1993 .

[16]  E. Zurif,et al.  Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs , 1987, Cognition.

[17]  William E. Cooper,et al.  Fundamental Frequency in Sentence Production , 1981 .

[18]  D. Swinney,et al.  Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias , 1981 .

[19]  Jan Edwards,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Lengthenings and shortenings and the nature of prosodic constituency , 1990 .

[20]  H. Damasio,et al.  Auditory perception of temporal and spectral events in patients with focal left and right cerebral lesions , 1990, Brain and Language.

[21]  William E. Cooper,et al.  Syntax and Speech , 1980 .

[22]  J. Pierrehumbert.  The phonology and phonetics of English intonation , 1987 .

[23]  R. Burchfield.  Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .