In pursuit of "normal": A review of the behaviour of cattle at pasture

Abstract One of the “Five Freedoms” proposed by the Farm Animal Welfare Council in Great Britain is that animals should be free to express normal behaviour. For various domesticated species, the study of still-existing wild ancestors has been one approach in the definition of normal. However, for domesticated cattle, no such wild ancestor exists, so the best that can be done is to study domesticated cattle in environments with little human interference. While several studies have been made of the behaviour of cattle under such conditions, no critical review of the literature has been published. This is the purpose of this paper. While it is surprising that no such review has been undertaken, given its usefulness in the study of the welfare of cattle, what is more surprising is that only 22 studies, published during the period 1927–2009, were considered for inclusion in the review. From the review, it can be concluded that cattle have quite an extensive repertoire of behaviour, comprising 40 identifiable categories and that, of all of the behaviours in their repertoire, grazing is the most common followed, generally, by ruminating and resting. In general, these three categories take up 90–95% of an animal's day. The review also showed that most grazing is performed during the hours of daylight, with very little grazing is observed at night. However, there were exceptions where considerable grazing was observed at night. Furthermore, the greater part of rumination occurred while animals were lying rather than standing and, although the information was scant, ruminating and resting tended to occur at night rather than during the day. Finally, cattle generally follow a diurnal rhythm characterised by peaks of grazing activity associated with sunrise and sunset.

[1]  P. Flood A Natural History of Domesticated Mammals, 2nd ed , 2001 .

[2]  W. A. Low,et al.  The influence of environment on daily maintenance behaviour of free-ranging Shorthorn cows in central Australia. I. General introduction and descriptive analysis of day-long activities , 1981 .

[3]  Studies on the habits of Zebu cattle II. Individual and group variation within a herd , 1955, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[4]  R. A. Peterson,et al.  Behavior of Hereford Cows and Calves on Short Grass Range. , 1955 .

[5]  T. Jones Improving the Well‐being of Animals in the Research Environment , 1996 .

[6]  F. Sneva Behavior of yearling cattle on eastern Oregon range. , 1970 .

[7]  J. Reppert Forage Preference and Grazing Habits of Cattle at the Eastern Colorado Range Station. , 1960 .

[8]  J. Quarterman,et al.  Observations on the grazing habits of grade and zebu steers in a high altitude temperate climate , 1958, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[9]  J. Hancock Grazing habits of dairy cows in New Zealand. , 1950 .

[10]  C. H. Herbel,et al.  Activities of Hereford and Santa Gertrudis Cattle on A Southern New Mexico Range. , 1966 .

[11]  K. Havstad,et al.  Grazing behavior of rangeland beef cattle differing in biological type. , 1991, Journal of animal science.

[12]  Michal Hejcman,et al.  Behavioural patterns of heifers under intensive and extensive continuous grazing on species-rich pasture in the Czech Republic , 2009 .

[13]  W. Williams,et al.  Behaviour of beef cattle in equatorial lowlands , 1975 .

[14]  F. W. Rogers Brambell,et al.  Report of the technical committee to enquire into the welfare of animals kept under intensive livestock husbandry systems , 1965 .

[15]  C. V. Vuure Retracing the aurochs : history, morphology and ecology of an extinct wild ox , 2005 .

[16]  D. B. Johnstone-Wallace,et al.  Grazing management practices and their relationship to the behaviour and grazing habits of cattle , 1944, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[17]  L. Buéno,et al.  An analysis of ingestive behaviour and activity of cattle under field conditions , 1978 .

[18]  F. Marshall Marshall's Physiology of Reproduction , 1990 .

[19]  S. Hall Chillingham cattle: social and maintenance behaviour in an ungulate that breeds all year round , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  The influence of environment on daily maintenance behaviour of free-ranging Shorthorn cows in central Australia. II. Multivariate analysis of duration and incidence of activities , 1981 .

[21]  G. Hughes,et al.  Studies on the behaviour of cattle and sheep in relation to the utilization of grass , 1951, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[22]  J. Holloway,et al.  Range behavior of Hereford, Hereford x Holstein and Holstein non-lactating heifers. , 1973, Journal of animal science.

[23]  A. Huuskonen,et al.  Comparison of time budgets of growing Hereford bulls in an uninsulated barn and in extensive forest paddocks , 2008 .

[24]  D. Dwyer Activities and grazing preferences of cows with calves in northern Osage County, Oklahoma , 1961 .

[25]  G. W. Arnold,et al.  Ethology of free-ranging domestic animals. , 1979 .

[26]  S. Sato,et al.  Social licking patterns in cattle (Bos taurus): influence of environmental and social factors , 1991 .

[27]  D. Mellor,et al.  Concepts of animal well-being and predicting the impact of procedures on experimental animals , 1994 .

[28]  V. L. Cory Activities of Livestock on the Range. , 1927 .

[29]  A. Hessle,et al.  Effect of breed, season and pasture moisture gradient on foraging behaviour in cattle on semi-natural grasslands , 2008 .

[30]  E. S. E. Hafez,et al.  The behaviour of domestic animals , 1963 .