A demand‐based perspective on sustainable competitive advantage

We develop an approach to analyzing the sustainability of competitive advantage that emphasizes demand-side factors. We extend the added-value approach to business strategy by introducing an explicit treatment of how firms create value for consumers. This allows us to characterize how consumer heterogeneity and marginal utility from performance improvements on the demand side interact with resource heterogeneity and improving technologies on the supply side. Using this approach, we address a variety of questions including whether technology substitutions will be permanent or transitory; the sequence in which new technologies attack different market segments; how rents from different types of resources change over time; whether decreasing marginal utility and imitation give rise to similar rent profiles; the extent of synergies within a firm's resource portfolio; the emergence of new generic strategies; and the conditions that support strategic diversity in a market. Our focus on consumer utility and value creation complements the traditional focus in the strategy literature on competition and value capture. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Peter Zemsky,et al.  Time Compression Diseconomies and Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 2004 .

[2]  J. Barney.  Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[3]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Economic Analysis of Product Innovation: The Case of CT Scanners , 1990 .

[4]  Jay B. Barney,et al.  Strategic Factor Market Intelligence: An Application of Information Economics to Strategy Formulation and Competitor Intelligence , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  BOARD OF DIRECTOR INVOLVEMENT IN RESTRUCTURING: THE EFFECTS OF BOARD VERSUS MANAGERIAL CONTROLS , 1993 .

[6]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Why are there So Many Multiunit Organizations? , 2003 .

[7]  Gonçalo Pacheco-de-Almeida,et al.  The Effect of Time-to-Build on Strategic Investment under Uncertainty , 2003 .

[8]  R. Grant.  Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, Applications , 1991 .

[9]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies Can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change , 1994 .

[10]  S. Lippman,et al.  Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition , 1982 .

[11]  Ron Adner,et al.  Strategy Dynamics Through a Demand-Based Lens: The Evolution of Market Boundaries, Resource Rents and Competitive Positions , 2003 .

[12]  R. Rumelt,et al.  What in the World is Competitive Advantage , 2003 .

[13]  John Roberts,et al.  Uncertain Imitability : An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition , 2007 .

[14]  Adam Brandenburger,et al.  Biform Games , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Ron Adner,et al.  Disruptive Technologies and the Emergence of Competition , 2003 .

[16]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[17]  Adam Brandenburger,et al.  Value-based Business Strategy , 2005 .

[18]  Michael D. Ryall,et al.  How Do Value Creation and Competition Determine Whether a Firm Appropriates Value? , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[19]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[20]  J. Barney.  Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes , 2001 .

[21]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[22]  Richard Makadok.  Can first-mover and early-mover advantages be sustained in an industry with low barriers to entry/imitation? , 1998 .

[23]  R. Rumelt.  Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm , 1984 .

[24]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[25]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[26]  Ron Adner.  When Are Technologies Disruptive: A Demand-Based View of the Emergence of Competition , 2002 .

[27]  Edwin R. Otto.  Innovation: The Attacker's Advantage , 1986 .

[28]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  The Emergence and Sustainability of Abnormal Profits , 2003 .

[29]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[30]  Steven T. Berry,et al.  Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium , 1995 .

[31]  P. Ghemawat.  Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy , 1991 .

[32]  J. Barney,et al.  IS THE RESOURCE-BASED " VIEW " A USEFUL PERSPECTIVE FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH ? , 2001 .

[33]  Richard Makadok.  Toward a synthesis of the resource‐based and dynamic‐capability views of rent creation , 2001 .

[34]  Henry Mintzberg.  Musings on management. Ten ideas designed to rile everyone who cares about management. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[35]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[36]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  HEDONIC PRICE INDEXES FOR AUTOMOBILES: AN ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF QUALITY CHANGE' , 2008 .

[37]  S. Lippman,et al.  A BARGAINING PERSPECTIVE ON RESOURCE ADVANTAGE , 2003 .

[38]  Ron Adner,et al.  A DEMAND-BASED PERSPECTIVE ON TECHNOLOGY LIFE CYCLES , 2004 .

[39]  Margaret A. Peteraf,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/mde.1126 Unraveling The Resource-Based Tangle , 2022 .

[40]  J. E. Butler,et al.  Tautology in the resource-based view and the implications of externally determined resource value: f , 2001 .

[41]  R. Rumelt.  Theory, Strategy, and Entrepreneurship , 2005 .

[42]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process Innovation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[43]  M. Porter.  Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[44]  W. Kim,et al.  Value innovation: the strategic logic of high growth. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[45]  R. V. Wyk.  Innovation: The attacker's advantage : Richard N. Foster 316 pages, £14.95 (London, Macmillan, 1986) , 1987 .