Exploring mathematics teacher knowledge to explain the gap between theory-based recommendations and school practice in the use of connecting tasks

This study is grounded in the theoretical position that solving problems in different ways creates mathematical connections when learning and teaching mathematics. It acknowledges the central role teachers play in providing students with learning opportunities, and it is based on the empirical finding that mathematics teachers are reluctant to solve problems in different ways in the classroom. In this paper we address the contradiction between theory-based recommendations and school mathematics practice. Based on analysis of individual interviews and two group meetings with 12 Israeli secondary school mathematics teachers, we demonstrate that in the context of multiple-solution connecting tasks this discrepancy is caused by the situated nature of the teachers’ knowledge. We also reveal the complex relationship between different types of teacher knowledge and argue the significance of developing a common language between members of the mathematics education community, including teacher educators and researchers.

[1]  T. P. Carpenter,et al.  Learning and teaching with understanding. , 1992 .

[2]  Lyn D. English,et al.  Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education , 2002 .

[3]  David Tall,et al.  Advanced Mathematical Thinking , 1994 .

[4]  R. Skemp.  The psychology of learning mathematics , 1979 .

[5]  D. Tirosh,et al.  Challenging and Changing Mathematics Teaching Classroom Practices , 2003 .

[6]  Peter Gates,et al.  Issues in mathematics teaching , 2001 .

[7]  R. Lesh,et al.  Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education. , 2000 .

[8]  J. Lave.  Teaching, as Learning, in Practice , 1996 .

[9]  J. Stigler,et al.  The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas from the World's Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom , 1999 .

[10]  Peggy A. House,et al.  Connecting Mathematics Across the Curriculum , 1995 .

[11]  Israel Scheffler,et al.  Conditions of knowledge , 1965 .

[12]  Problem-Solving Preferences of Mathematics Teachers: Focusing on Symmetry , 2003 .

[13]  Martin A. Simon.  Developing new models of mathematics teaching: An imperative for research on mathematics teacher development , 1997 .

[14]  K. Krainer.  Powerful tasks: A contribution to a high level of acting and reflecting in mathematics instruction , 1993 .

[15]  B. Rogoff.  Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context , 1990 .

[16]  Arthur F. Coxford,et al.  Professional Development for Teachers of Mathematics , 1994 .

[17]  Lyn D. English.  Flux in School Algebra: Curricular Change, Graphing Technology, and Research on Student Learning and Teacher Knowledge , 2002 .

[18]  J. Dewey.  How we think : a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process , 1934 .

[19]  D. Murray.  Learning by Teaching , 1982 .

[20]  Elizabeth Fennema,et al.  Mathematics Teachers in Transition , 1997 .

[21]  A. Schoenfeld.  On mathematics as sense-making: An informal attack on the unfortunate divorce of formal and informal mathematics. , 1991 .

[22]  J. Calderhead.  Exploring teachers' thinking , 1987 .

[23]  L. Shulman.  Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[24]  Hyman Bass,et al.  Knowing Mathematics for Teaching Who Knows Mathematics Well Enough To Teach Third Grade, and How Can We Decide? , 2005 .

[25]  Heinz Steinbring.  Elements of Epistemological Knowledge for Mathematics Teachers , 1998 .

[26]  Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al.  When Good Teaching Leads to Bad Results: The Disasters of 'Well-Taught' Mathematics Courses , 1988 .

[27]  I. Scheffler.  Conditions of Knowledge: An Introduction to Epistemology and Education , 1983 .

[28]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[29]  Policy, practices and principles in teaching numeracy: what makes a difference? , 2002 .

[30]  John Mason,et al.  Mathematics as a Constructive Activity: Learners Generating Examples , 2005 .

[31]  Roza Leikin,et al.  Implementation of Multiple Solution Connecting Tasks: Do Students' Attitudes Support Teachers' Reluctance? , 2006 .

[32]  Edward A. Silver,et al.  Moving from rhetoric to praxis: Issues faced by teachers in having students consider multiple solutions for problems in the mathematics classroom , 2005 .

[33]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[34]  S. R. Campbell,et al.  Number theory in mathematics education : perspectives and prospects , 2006 .

[35]  Jeremy Kilpatrick,et al.  International handbook of mathematics education , 1997 .

[36]  Douglas A. Grouws,et al.  Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning , 1992 .

[37]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[38]  D. Perkins,et al.  Informal reasoning and education , 1991 .

[39]  R. Glaser.  Advances in Instructional Psychology , 1978 .

[40]  Mary M. Kennedy,et al.  Knowledge and Teaching , 2002 .

[41]  Peggy A. House,et al.  Connecting Mathematics across the Curriculum. 1995 Yearbook. , 1995 .

[42]  Thomas J. Cooney,et al.  Inservice Mathematics Teacher Education: The Importance of Listening , 1996 .

[43]  L. Darling-Hammond,et al.  Teaching as the Learning Profession : Handbook of Policy and Practice , 1999 .