Technological innovation in PPPs: incentives, opportunities and actions

From a construction perspective, Public‐Private Partnership projects (PPPs) are often credited as providing real incentives for the actors involved as well as a business environment that is conducive to innovation and improved practices. The validity of four common rhetorical arguments used to promote the PPP procurement route is explored: collaborative working, design freedom, long‐term commitment and risk transfer. Particular interest is given to the extent to which espoused intentions correlate with experienced realities in allowing actors involved in the design and construction phases to be presented with, and able to exploit, opportunities for technological innovation. It is argued that there is reason to be cautious in fully accepting the purported benefits of the PPP framework and that the arguments often presented need to be revised. Alternative interpretations are provided.

[1]  C. Freeman.  Economics of Industrial Innovation , 1975 .

[2]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[3]  Clyde B. Tatum,et al.  What prompts construction innovation , 1984 .

[4]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[5]  K. Eisenhardt.  Better Stories and Better Constructs: The Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic , 1991 .

[6]  J J A M Reijniers.  Organization of public-private partnership projects: The timely prevention of pitfalls , 1994 .

[7]  P. Grout.  The Economics of the Private Finance Initiative , 1997 .

[8]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[9]  C. Freeman,et al.  The Economics of Industrial Innovation - 3rd Edition , 1997 .

[10]  P Hall,et al.  PFI- THE LAST CHANCE SALOON? , 1998 .

[11]  D. Kerr.  The Private Finance Initiative and the Changing Governance of the Built Environment , 1998 .

[12]  Andrew Edkins,et al.  Constructors' Key Guide to PFI , 1998 .

[13]  David Gann,et al.  Do regulations encourage innovation? The case of energy efficiency in housing. , 1998 .

[14]  Jon Sundbo,et al.  The Theory of Innovation: Entrepreneurs, Technology and Strategy , 1999 .

[15]  Raghu Garud,et al.  The innovation journey , 1999 .

[16]  Lawrie Haynes,et al.  Commercialising the management and maintenance of trunk roads in the United Kingdom , 1999 .

[17]  Pauline Marie Rosenau,et al.  Public-Private Policy Partnerships , 2000 .

[18]  M. Spackman.  Public-private partnerships: lessons from the British approach , 2002 .

[19]  J. Broadbent,et al.  Accounting choices: technical and political trade‐offs and the UK’s private finance initiative , 2002 .

[20]  Martin Betts,et al.  An examination on the sustainable competitive advantage of private finance initiative projects , 2002 .

[21]  S. Read.  Applications of Case Study Research , 2003 .

[22]  R. Leiringer.  Technological innovations in the context of public-private partnership projects , 2003 .

[23]  M. Fischbacher,et al.  PFI, Public—Private Partnerships and the Neglected Importance of Process: Stakeholders and the Employment Dimension , 2003 .

[24]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[25]  Jasper K. Imungi,et al.  Women entrepreneurship capacity development in Meru South and Kilifi districts of Kenya. Prepared for United Nations Industrial development Organization (UNIDO), Vienna, Austria , 2005 .