Human evoked cortical activity to signal-to-noise ratio and absolute signal level

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of signal level and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on the latency and amplitude of evoked cortical activity to further our understanding of how the human central auditory system encodes signals in noise. Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) were recorded from 15 young normal-hearing adults in response to a 1000 Hz tone presented at two tone levels in quiet and while continuous background noise levels were varied in five equivalent SNR steps. These 12 conditions were used to determine the effects of signal level and SNR level on CAEP components P1, N1, P2, and N2. Based on prior signal-in-noise experiments conducted in animals, we hypothesized that SNR, would be a key contributor to human CAEP characteristics. As hypothesized, amplitude increased and latency decreased with increasing SNR; in addition, there was no main effect of tone level across the two signal levels tested (60 and 75 dB SPL). Morphology of the P1-N1-P2 complex was driven primarily by SNR, highlighting the importance of noise when recording CAEPs. Results are discussed in terms of the current interest in recording CAEPs in hearing aid users.

[1]  G. Adler,et al.  Auditory stimulus processing at different stimulus intensities as reflected by auditory evoked potentials , 1991, Biological Psychiatry.

[2]  D. P. Phillips.  Temporal response features of cat auditory cortex neurons contributing to sensitivity to tones delivered in the presence of continuous noise , 1985, Hearing Research.

[3]  H. A. Beagley,et al.  Changes in Auditory Evoked Response with Intensity , 1967, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[4]  Liat Kishon-Rabin,et al.  Identification of syllables in noise: electrophysiological and behavioral correlates. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  The Masking of Pure Tones and of Speech by White Noise , 1950 .

[6]  Curtis J. Billings,et al.  Effects of Hearing Aid Amplification and Stimulus Intensity on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials , 2007, Audiology and Neurotology.

[7]  H. Davis,et al.  Principles of electric response audiometry. , 1976, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[8]  D. Kurtzberg,et al.  Evoked potential assessment of auditory system integrity in infants. , 1991, Clinics in perinatology.

[9]  Wolfgang Skrandies,et al.  Data reduction of multichannel fields: Global field power and Principal Component Analysis , 2005, Brain Topography.

[10]  Brett A. Martin,et al.  Effects of Low-Pass Noise Masking on Auditory Event-Related Potentials to Speech , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[11]  Pamela E Souza,et al.  The Neural Representation of Consonant-Vowel Transitions in Adults Who Wear Hearing Aids , 2006, Trends in amplification.

[12]  D. P. Phillips.  Neural representation of sound amplitude in the auditory cortex: effects of noise masking , 1990, Behavioural Brain Research.

[13]  P G Stelmachowicz,et al.  The perception of amplified speech by listeners with hearing loss: acoustic correlates. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  T W Picton,et al.  Amplitude of evoked responses to tones of high intensity. , 1970, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[15]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Loudness functions under inhibition , 1967 .

[16]  D. Stapells,et al.  The Effects of Broadband Noise Masking on Cortical Event‐Related Potentials to Speech Sounds /ba/ and /da/ , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[17]  Pamela E Souza,et al.  Effect of Probe Tube Insertion Depth on Spectral Measures of Speech , 2006, Trends in amplification.

[18]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[19]  P. Souza,et al.  Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the neural representation of speech cues , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  M. Hyde,et al.  The N1 response and its applications. , 1997, Audiology & neuro-otology.

[21]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  The sound of a sinusoid: Time‐interval models , 1994 .

[22]  R. Butler,et al.  Stimulus repetition rate factors which influence the auditory evoked potential in man. , 1969, Psychophysiology.

[23]  R. Burkard,et al.  The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. I. Rate and intensity effects. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Harvey Dillon,et al.  Aided Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials for Hearing Instrument Evaluation in Infants , 2005 .

[25]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Cortical, auditory, evoked potentials in response to changes of spectrum and amplitude. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  R. Kirk.  Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[27]  S. Roux,et al.  Frontal auditory evoked potentials and augmenting-reducing. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[28]  Drf Irvine,et al.  INJURY‐ AND USE‐RELATED PLASTICITY IN THE PRIMARY SENSORY CORTEX OF ADULT MAMMALS: POSSIBLE RELATIONSHIP TO PERCEPTUAL LEARNING , 1996, Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology.

[29]  Pamela E Souza,et al.  New Perspectives on Assessing Amplification Effects , 2006, Trends in amplification.

[30]  Harvey Dillon,et al.  The relationship between obligatory cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) and functional measures in young infants. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[31]  N. Kraus,et al.  Mismatch Negativity in the Assessment of Central Auditory Function. , 1994, American journal of audiology.

[32]  E. Perl,et al.  The estimation of hearing threshold by electroencephalography. , 1953, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[33]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  A temporal component of the auditory evoked response. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[34]  D. P. Phillips,et al.  Central auditory onset responses, and temporal asymmetries in auditory perception , 2002, Hearing Research.

[35]  K. Tremblay,et al.  Speech Evoked Potentials: From the Laboratory to the Clinic , 2008, Ear and hearing.

[36]  Diane Kurtzberg,et al.  Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Cortical Event-Related Potential and Behavioral Measures of Speech-Sound Processing , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[37]  Curtis J. Billings,et al.  Speech evoked cortical potentials: effects of age and stimulus presentation rate. , 2004, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[38]  G. McCandless,et al.  Summed evoked responses using pure-tone stimuli. , 1966, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[39]  L. Graziani,et al.  Auditory‐evoked responses in normal, brain‐damaged, and deaf infants , 1967, Neurology.

[40]  W. Ritter,et al.  The sources of auditory evoked responses recorded from the human scalp. , 1970, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[41]  Diane Kurtzberg,et al.  Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Personal Hearing Aids on Cortical Event-Related Potential and Behavioral Measures of Speech-Sound Processing , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[42]  C. Pollak,et al.  Evoked responses to clicks and tones of varying intensity in waking adults. , 1966, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[43]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[44]  D P Phillips,et al.  Spike-rate intensity functions of cat cortical neurons studied with combined tone-noise stimuli. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  W. Marovitz,et al.  Spiral Migration Theory of Organ of Corti Development , 1976, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[46]  G. Adler,et al.  Influence of stimulus intensity on AEP components in the 80- to 200-millisecond latency range. , 1989, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[47]  Curtis J. Billings,et al.  Neural Representation of Amplified Speech Sounds , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[48]  Donald Robertson,et al.  Plasticity of frequency organization in auditory cortex of guinea pigs with partial unilateral deafness , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[49]  Pamela Souza,et al.  Aging alters the neural representation of speech cues , 2002, Neuroreport.

[50]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  Discrimination of wideband noises modulated by a temporally asymmetric function , 1995 .

[51]  M. Dorman,et al.  Central auditory maturation and babbling development in infants with cochlear implants. , 2004, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[52]  H. Davis,et al.  Further validation of evoked response audiometry (ERA). , 1967, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[53]  E. Young,et al.  Similarity of dynamic range adjustment in auditory nerve and cochlear nuclei. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[54]  D. M. Green,et al.  Characterization of external ear impulse responses using Golay codes. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.