Genetic correlates of efavirenz hypersusceptibility

Background: Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) hypersusceptibility is seen in approximately 30% of HIV isolates with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance. NNRTI hypersusceptibility has been associated with improved outcomes to NNRTI-based therapy. Objective: To determine the genetic correlates of efavirenz hypersusceptibility. Methods: Paired baseline genotypes and phenotypes were obtained from 444 NRTI-experienced, NNRTI-naive patients. Fisher's exact tests, recursive partitioning (classification and regression trees; CART), and stepwise binary regression were used to identify specific reverse transcriptase (RT) mutations associated with efavirenz hypersusceptibility. Results: In univariate analyses, 26 RT codons were associated with efavirenz hypersusceptibility (P < 0.05), the top five were 215 > 41 > 210 > 118 > 208 (all P < 0.000001). From stepwise model selection, the 215, 208 and 118 mutations remained independently predictive of efavirenz hypersusceptibility. A final binary regression model to predict efavirenz hypersusceptibility included one covariate for the 215 mutation (relative risk 2.6, P < 0.0001) and a second covariate representing either the 208 or 118 mutation (relative risk 1.8, P < 0.0001). Similarly, in a CART analysis, a mutation at codon 215 was the first split selected, followed by mutations at 208 and 118. An efavirenz hypersusceptibility genotypic score using the three mutations 208, 118 and 215 was as accurate at predicting efavirenz hypersusceptibility as a more complex scoring system using 26 mutations. Conclusion: Mutations at 215, 208 and 118 were independently associated with NNRTI hypersusceptibility. After confirmatory studies using other large datasets, incorporating a hypersusceptibility score into genotype interpretation algorithms will improve the prediction of NNRTI hypersusceptibility.

[1]  V. Calvez,et al.  Thymidine analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors resistance mutations profiles and association to other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors resistance mutations observed in the context of virological failure , 2004, Journal of medical virology.

[2]  R. Haubrich,et al.  The clinical relevance of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor hypersusceptibility: a prospective cohort analysis , 2002, AIDS.

[3]  T. Wrin,et al.  Hypersusceptibility to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in HIV-1: clinical, phenotypic and genotypic correlates , 2002, AIDS.

[4]  M R Petersen,et al.  Prevalence proportion ratios: estimation and hypothesis testing. , 1998, International journal of epidemiology.

[5]  J. Corbeil,et al.  Genetic Basis of Hypersusceptibility to Protease Inhibitors and Low Replicative Capacity of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Strains in Primary Infection , 2004, Journal of Virology.

[6]  K. White,et al.  Mechanistic Basis for Reduced Viral and Enzymatic Fitness of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Containing Both K65R and M184V Mutations* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  Victor DeGruttola,et al.  Dual vs single protease inhibitor therapy following antiretroviral treatment failure: a randomized trial. , 2002, JAMA.

[8]  Lee Bacheler,et al.  Phenotypic susceptibility and virological outcome in nucleoside-experienced patients receiving three or four antiretroviral drugs , 2003, AIDS.

[9]  D. Katzenstein,et al.  Phenotypic hypersusceptibility to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients: impact on virological response to efavirenz-based therapy , 2001, AIDS.

[10]  W. Keulen,et al.  Reduced replication of 3TC‐resistant HIV‐1 variants in primary cells due to a processivity defect of the reverse transcriptase enzyme. , 1996, The EMBO journal.