Effects of sensorimotor transformations with graphical input devices
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M L Lin,et al. Gain effects on performance using a head-controlled computer input device. , 1992, Ergonomics.
[2] Martina Ziefle,et al. Psychomotor Efficiency in Users of Notebook Input Devices: Confirmation and Restrictions of Fitts' Law as an Evaluative Tool for User-Friendly Design , 2004 .
[3] Joel S. Greenstein,et al. Optimizing the Touch Tablet: The Effects of Control-Display Gain and Method of Cursor Control , 1986 .
[4] W. Prinz,et al. Programming tool-use actions. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[5] M. Ziessler,et al. Cognitive control of action: The role of action effects , 2004, Psychological research.
[6] Evan D. Graham,et al. Virtual Pointing on a Computer Display: Non-Linear Control-Display Mappings , 1996, Graphics Interface.
[7] Wilfried Kunde,et al. Does a tool eliminate spatial compatibility effects? , 2008 .
[8] C Sutter,et al. Notebook input devices put to the age test: the usability of trackpoint and touchpad for middle-aged adults , 2007, Ergonomics.
[9] M. Shiffrar,et al. Fitts's Law Holds for Action Perception , 2007, Psychological science.
[10] I. Scott MacKenzie,et al. Effects of output display and control - display gain on human performance in interactive systems , 1994, Behav. Inf. Technol..
[11] Michael Bohan,et al. KINEMATIC ANALYSIS OF MOUSE CURSOR POSITIONING AS A FUNCTION OF MOVEMENT SCALE AND JOINT SET , 2003 .
[12] J. Müsseler,et al. Perceiving one’s own movements when using a tool , 2009, Consciousness and Cognition.
[13] A. Greenwald,et al. Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. , 1970, Psychological review.
[14] Wilfried Kunde,et al. Spatial Compatibility Effects With Tool Use , 2007, Hum. Factors.
[15] D. Chaffin,et al. An investigation of fitts' law using a wide range of movement amplitudes. , 1976, Journal of motor behavior.
[16] Wolfgang Prinz,et al. Compensation for and adaptation to changes in the environment , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.
[17] G. Aschersleben,et al. The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework of perception and action , 2001 .
[18] Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals ( VDTs ) — Part 11 : Guidance on usability , 1998 .
[19] Martina Ziefle,et al. Psychomotor Performance of Input Device Users and Optimized Cursor Control , 2006 .
[20] Sarah A. Douglas,et al. The ergonomics of computer pointing devices , 1997, Advanced perspectives in applied computing.
[21] Stuart K. Card,et al. Powermice and user performance , 1990, CHI '90.
[22] Renaud Blanch,et al. Semantic pointing: improving target acquisition with control-display ratio adaptation , 2004, CHI.
[23] Joel S. Greenstein,et al. Is Display/Control Gain a Useful Metric for Optimizing an Interface? , 1990 .
[24] Jochen Müsseler,et al. User Specific Design of Interfaces and Interaction Techniques: What Do Older Computer Users Need? , 2007, HCI.
[25] Brian W. Epps. Comparison of Six Cursor Control Devices Based on Fitts' Law Models , 1986 .
[26] I.,et al. Fitts' Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..
[27] Daniel Vogel,et al. The Impact of Control-Display Gain on User Performance in Pointing Tasks , 2008, Hum. Comput. Interact..
[28] Henning Brau,et al. Anticipatory movement compatibility for virtual reality interaction devices , 2010, Behav. Inf. Technol..
[29] P. Fitts. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.
[30] C Sutter,et al. Sensumotor transformation of input devices and the impact on practice and task difficulty , 2007, Ergonomics.
[31] Shumin Zhai,et al. Scale effects in steering law tasks , 2001, CHI.
[32] D. Spalding. The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.
[33] Ulrich Tränkle,et al. Factors influencing speed and precision of cursor positioning using a mouse , 1991 .