Sight obstruction at at-grade pedestrian crossings: A review of the understanding of the meaning of zigzag lines

Parked and stopped vehicles in the vicinity of an at-grade pedestrian crossing obstruct visibility between pedestrians crossing the roadway and approaching vehicles, leading into vehicle-pedestrian crashes. Pavement zigzag line markings at at-grade pedestrian crossings, mostly at mid-block locations are used to restrict parking, stopping, and overtaking within the crossing, to enhance driver-pedestrian visibility. Yet, in some countries zigzag lines are used as advance markings to the crossing. Like any other traffic control device, zigzag lines' effectiveness hinges on road user's understanding of their meanings. This paper reviews the literature on the applications and understanding of these lines at pedestrian crossings. The meaning of zigzag line pavement markings at pedestrian crossings has not been well understood to some road users and road safety stakeholders worldwide. This dilemma may suggest that educating road users, especially drivers, may be necessary in order to improve pedestrian safety. Documented literature such as this one may also improve the understanding of these lines to road safety stakeholders. Despite of the importance of unobstructed sight between the pedestrian and the driver, treatments in the forms of signs and pavement markings require continuous education and enforcement. Practicing traffic engineers may want to place more emphasis on engineering treatments that are more effective in improving pedestrian safety, such as those that manages vehicle speeds, than relying heavily on traffic control devices that are often misunderstood and lesser effective such as zigzag lines.

[1]  Lars Leden,et al.  Safe pedestrian crossings for children and elderly. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Anne T McCartt,et al.  A review of evidence-based traffic engineering measures designed to reduce pedestrian-motor vehicle crashes. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[3]  Hubrecht Ribbens PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES IN SOUTH AFRICA: RESEARCH AND PRACTICE , 1996 .

[4]  Charles Zegeer,et al.  EUROPEAN PRACTICES AND INNOVATIONS FOR PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS , 1995 .

[5]  R G Hughes Improving Access to Roundabouts and Channelized Turn Lanes for he Visually Impaired: An Update on NCHRP Project 3-78 , 2006 .

[6]  Thierry Brenac,et al.  The indirect involvement of buses in traffic accident processes , 2005 .

[7]  Dale L. Picha,et al.  Teenage Drivers’ Understanding of Traffic Control Devices , 2000 .

[8]  K Fitzpatrick,et al.  ON-STREET PEDESTRIAN SURVEYS OF PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TREATMENTS , 2004 .

[9]  Madaniyo Mutabazi Evaluation of the New Pedestrian Crossing in Trinidad , 2009 .

[10]  P T Cairney UNDERSTANDING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES , 1989 .

[11]  Margaret J. Rys,et al.  MOTORIST UNDERSTANDING OF SELECTED WARNING SIGNS , 1996 .

[12]  J M Mayr,et al.  Child pedestrian injuries at tram and bus stops. , 2002, Injury.

[13]  P Krawczyk Creating Pedestrian and Bicycle Systems in Conjunction With New Development , 1995 .

[14]  David G Davies,et al.  RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PEDESTRIAN SAFETY FACILITIES IN THE UNITED KINGDOM , 1999 .

[15]  S. Cairns Achieving safer school travel in the UK , 2005 .

[16]  Vaughan W Inman,et al.  Synthesis of Literature Relevant to Roundabout Signalization to Provide Pedestrian Access , 2007 .

[17]  A Várhelyi,et al.  Drivers' speed behaviour at a zebra crossing: a case study. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Andrea Berghold,et al.  Causes and consequences of pedestrian injuries in children , 2002, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[19]  Rcm Dunn UNSIGNALIZED PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS: NEW ZEALAND'S TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION , 1989 .

[20]  T Redmon Assessing the Attitudes and Behaviors of Pedestrians and Drivers in Traffic Situations , 2003 .