Intensity-based energy transfer measurements in digital imaging microscopy

Abstract Investigation of protein-protein associations is important in understanding structure and function relationships in living cells. Using Förster-type resonance energy transfer between donor and acceptor labeled monoclonal antibodies we can assess the cell surface topology of membrane proteins against which the antibodies were raised. In our current work we elaborated a quantitative image microscopic technique based on the measurement of fluorescence intensities to calculate the energy transfer efficiency on a pixel-by-pixel basis. We made use of the broad excitation and emission spectrum of cellular autofluorescence for background correction of images. In addition to the reference autofluorescence images (UV background) we recorded three fluorescent images (donor, acceptor and energy transfer signal) of donor-acceptor double labeled samples, and corrected for spectral spillage of the directly excited donor and acceptor fluorescence into the energy transfer image. After careful image registration we were able to calculate the energy transfer efficiency on a pixel-by-pixel basis. In this paper, we also present a critical comparison between results obtained with this method and other approaches (photobleaching and flow cytometric energy transfer measurements).

[1]  M. Loken,et al.  Comparison of helium-neon and dye lasers for the excitation of allophycocyanin. , 1987, Cytometry.

[2]  T M Jovin,et al.  Imaging the intracellular trafficking and state of the AB5 quaternary structure of cholera toxin. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[3]  T. Jovin,et al.  Fluorescence energy transfer measurements on cell surfaces: a critical comparison of steady-state fluorimetric and flow cytometric methods. , 1984, Cytometry.

[4]  S. Damjanovich,et al.  Dynamic receptor superstructures at the plasma membrane , 1997, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[5]  C. Heldin,et al.  Dimerization of cell surface receptors in signal transduction , 1995, Cell.

[6]  P. S. Pine,et al.  Cross-linking of CD4 in a TCR/CD3-juxtaposed inhibitory state: a pFRET study. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[7]  I. T. Young,et al.  Influence of fluorochrome labeling density on the photobleaching kinetics of fluorescein in microscopy. , 1997, Cytometry.

[8]  F. Waldman,et al.  Autofluorescence correction for fluorescence in situ hybridization. , 1995, Cytometry.

[9]  T. Bisseling,et al.  Microspectroscopic imaging of nodulation factor-binding sites on living Vicia sativa roots using a novel bioactive fluorescent nodulation factor. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[10]  J W Gray,et al.  An improved immunocytochemical procedure for high-sensitivity detection of incorporated bromodeoxyuridine. , 1987, Cytometry.

[11]  J. Eisinger.  Energy transfer and dynamical structure , 1976, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[12]  J A Steinkamp,et al.  Dual-laser, differential fluorescence correction method for reducing cellular background autofluorescence. , 1986, Cytometry.

[13]  D R Parks,et al.  A single laser method for subtraction of cell autofluorescence in flow cytometry. , 1987, Cytometry.

[14]  H. Tanke,et al.  Influence of the triplet excited state on the photobleaching kinetics of fluorescein in microscopy. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[15]  R. Young,et al.  Quantitation of fluorescence energy transfer between cell surface proteins via fluorescence donor photobleaching kinetics. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[16]  S. Lockett,et al.  Co-localization of the tumor-suppressor protein p53 and human papillomavirus E6 protein in human cervical carcinoma cell lines. , 1993, Oncogene.

[17]  T. Jovin,et al.  Flow cytometric measurement of fluorescence resonance energy transfer on cell surfaces. Quantitative evaluation of the transfer efficiency on a cell-by-cell basis. , 1984, Biophysical journal.

[18]  H. Petty,et al.  Detection of transmembrane linkages between immunoglobulin or complement receptors and the neutrophil's cortical microfilaments by resonance energy transfer microscopy. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  I. T. Young,et al.  Photobleaching kinetics of fluorescein in quantitative fluorescence microscopy. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[20]  I Hemmilä,et al.  Use of fluorescent europium chelates as labels in microscopy allows glutaraldehyde fixation and permanent mounting and leads to reduced autofluorescence and good long‐term stability , 1994, Microscopy research and technique.

[21]  T M Jovin,et al.  Microspectroscopic imaging tracks the intracellular processing of a signal transduction protein: fluorescent-labeled protein kinase C beta I. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  J. Forslid,et al.  Quenching of intracellular autofluorescence in alveolar macrophages permits analysis of fluorochrome labelled surface antigens by flow cytofluorometry. , 1991, Journal of immunological methods.

[23]  D. Alexander,et al.  Does co‐aggregation of the CD45 and CD3 antigens inhibit T cell antigen receptor complex‐mediated activation of phospholipase C and protein kinase C? , 1992, European journal of immunology.

[24]  R. Tsien,et al.  On/off blinking and switching behaviour of single molecules of green fluorescent protein , 1997, Nature.

[25]  Z. Kam,et al.  Mapping of adherens junction components using microscopic resonance energy transfer imaging. , 1995, Journal of cell science.

[26]  S. Damjanovich,et al.  Physical association between MHC class I and class II molecules detected on the cell surface by flow cytometric energy transfer. , 1989, Journal of immunology.

[27]  P. Uster,et al.  Resonance energy transfer microscopy: observations of membrane-bound fluorescent probes in model membranes and in living cells , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[28]  Thomas M. Jovin,et al.  FRET Microscopy: Digital Imaging of Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer. Application in Cell Biology , 1989 .