Improving Arctic sea ice edge forecasts by assimilating high horizontal resolution sea ice concentration data into the US Navy's ice forecast systems

Abstract. This study presents the improvement in ice edge error within the US Navy's operational sea ice forecast systems gained by assimilating high horizontal resolution satellite-derived ice concentration products. Since the late 1980's, the ice forecast systems have assimilated near real-time sea ice concentration derived from the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) Special Sensor Microwave/Imager (SSMI and then SSMIS). The resolution of the satellite-derived product was approximately the same as the previous operational ice forecast system (25 km). As the sea ice forecast model resolution increased over time, the need for higher horizontal resolution observational data grew. In 2013, a new Navy sea ice forecast system (Arctic Cap Nowcast/Forecast System – ACNFS) went into operations with a horizontal resolution of ~ 3.5 km at the North Pole. A method of blending ice concentration observations from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR2) along with a sea ice mask produced by the National Ice Center (NIC) has been developed, resulting in an ice concentration product with very high spatial resolution. In this study, ACNFS was initialized with this newly developed high resolution blended ice concentration product. The daily ice edge locations from model hindcast simulations were compared against independent observed ice edge locations. ACNFS initialized using the high resolution blended ice concentration data product decreased predicted ice edge location error compared to the operational system that only assimilated SSMIS data. A second evaluation assimilating the new blended sea ice concentration product into the pre-operational Navy Global Ocean Forecast System 3.1 also showed a substantial improvement in ice edge location over a system using the SSMIS sea ice concentration product alone. This paper describes the technique used to create the blended sea ice concentration product and the significant improvements in ice edge forecasting in both of the Navy's sea ice forecasting systems.

[1]  J. Cummings,et al.  Ocean Data Impacts in Global HYCOM , 2014 .

[2]  Jeffrey R. Key,et al.  Arctic sea ice in transformation: A review of recent observed changes and impacts on biology and human activity , 2014 .

[3]  Lars Kaleschke,et al.  Investigating High-Resolution AMSR2 Sea Ice Concentrations during the February 2013 Fracture Event in the Beaufort Sea , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[4]  D. Cavalieri,et al.  Investigation of the effects of summer melt on the calculation of sea ice concentration using active and passive microwave data , 1990 .

[5]  Ye Hong,et al.  Design and Evaluation of the First Special Sensor Microwave Imager/Sounder , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  Misako Kachi,et al.  INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE AND CALIBRATION OF AMSR-E AND AMSR2 , 2010 .

[7]  J. Comiso,et al.  Trends in the sea ice cover using enhanced and compatible AMSR‐E, SSM/I, and SMMR data , 2008 .

[8]  Florence Fetterer,et al.  How do sea-ice concentrations from operational data compare with passive microwave estimates? Implications for improved model evaluations and forecasting , 2015, Annals of Glaciology.

[9]  Thorsten Markus,et al.  An enhancement of the NASA Team sea ice algorithm , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[10]  H. Zwally,et al.  Arctic sea-ice variations from time-lapse passive microwave imagery , 1980 .

[11]  B. Ramsay,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6720 Enhancements to, and forthcoming developments in the Interactive Multisensor Snow and Ice Mapping System (IMS) † , 2022 .

[12]  H. Zwally,et al.  Time-dependence of sea-ice concentration and multiyear ice fraction in the Arctic Basin , 1978 .