Particle measurement programme (PMP) light-duty inter-laboratory exercise: comparison of different particle number measurement systems

The particle measurement programme (PMP) used a particle measurement system (reference system (RS)) to quantify the particle number emissions of several vehicles. The RS was circulated around several laboratories to represent an internal standard. During the exercise dilution factors, losses and volatile removal efficiencies of the RS were regularly checked. In parallel with the RS, some labs employed their own particle measurement systems (lab systems (LS)) to determine the emissions of the same test vehicles. Comparisons between results from the RS and the LS showed that several different instruments were capable of measuring particle number emissions to within ±15% across an emission range of four orders of magnitude. Real-time emission patterns also correlated well in most cases. However, larger differences were observed when dilution factors and losses were not accurately determined and subjected to correction. Equivalence between measurement systems can be achieved once calibration and validation procedures are standardized for both manufacturers and users.

[1]  J. Gras,et al.  Intercomparison of number concentration measurements by various aerosol particle counters , 2002 .

[2]  Gilmore J. Sem,et al.  Design and performance characteristics of three continuous-flow condensation particle counters: a summary , 2002 .

[3]  Giechaskiel Barouch,et al.  Particle Measurement Programme (PMP) Light-duty Inter-laboratory Correlation Exercise (ILCE_LD) Final Report , 2007 .

[4]  Leonidas Ntziachristos,et al.  Comparability of particle emission measurements between vehicle testing laboratories: a long way to go , 2004 .

[5]  Masayuki Adachi,et al.  Real-Time Measuring System for Engine Exhaust Solid Particle Number Emission - Design and Performance , 2006 .

[6]  Jon Andersson,et al.  Particle Measurement Programme (PMP):Particle Size and Number Emissions Before, During and After Regeneration Events of a Euro 4 DPF Equipped Light-Duty Diesel Vehicle. , 2007 .

[7]  Hannu Vesala,et al.  Comparison of Different Dilution Methods for Measuring Diesel Particle Emissions , 2004 .

[8]  M. Kasper,et al.  The Number Concentration of Non-Volatile Particles - Design Study for an Instrument According to the PMP Recommendations , 2004 .

[9]  Martin Mohr,et al.  Particle emissions from diesel passenger cars equipped with a particle trap in comparison to other technologies. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Heinz Burtscher,et al.  An accurate, continuously adjustable dilution system (1:10 to 1:104) for submicron aerosols , 1997 .

[11]  Leonidas Ntziachristos,et al.  Comparative Assessment of Two Different Sampling Systems for Particle Emission Type-Approval Measurements , 2005 .

[12]  Leonidas Ntziachristos,et al.  Performance Evaluation of a Novel Sampling and Measurement System for Exhaust Particle Characterization , 2004 .

[13]  C. Leung,et al.  Characterisation of diesel exhaust particle number and size distributions using mini-dilution tunnel and ejector-diluter measurement techniques , 2003 .

[14]  Konstantinos Boulouchos,et al.  Influence of diesel engine combustion parameters on primary soot particle diameter. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Leonidas Ntziachristos,et al.  Calibration and modelling of ejector dilutors for automotive exhaust sampling , 2004 .

[16]  Martin Mohr,et al.  Part 2: Effect of sampling conditions and fuel sulphur content on the particle emission , 2003 .

[17]  J. Gras,et al.  Particle size dependent response of aerosol counters , 2002 .

[18]  M. Cheng,et al.  Impacts of Venturi Turbulent Mixing on the Size Distributions of Sodium Chloride and Dioctyl-Phthalate Aerosols , 2002 .

[19]  Oliver F. Bischof,et al.  Calibration of Condensation Particle Counters , 2005 .

[20]  D. Kittelson,et al.  A New Electrical Mobility Particle Sizer Spectrometer for Engine Exhaust Particle Measurements , 2004 .

[21]  W. Koch,et al.  Verdünnungssystem für die Messung hochkonzentrierter Acrosole mit optischen Partikelzählern , 1988 .

[22]  Efthimios Zervas,et al.  Comparison of Exhaust Particle Number Measured by EEPS, CPC, and ELPI , 2006 .

[23]  J. Hudson,et al.  Intercomparison Study of the Size-Dependent Counting Efficiency of 26 Condensation Particle Counters , 1997 .