Towards Distributed Optimal Movement Strategy for Data Gathering in Wireless Sensor Networks

In this paper, we address how to design a distributed movement strategy for mobile collectors, which can be either physical mobile agents or query/collector packets periodically launched by the sink, to achieve successful data gathering in wireless sensor networks. Formulating the problem as general random walks on a graph composed of sensor nodes, we analyze how much data can be successfully gathered in time under any Markovian random-walk movement strategies for mobile collectors moving over a graph (or network), while each sensor node is equipped with limited buffer space and data arrival rates are heterogeneous over different sensor nodes. In particular, from the analysis, we obtain the optimal movement strategy among a class of Markovian strategies so as to minimize the data loss rate over all sensor nodes, and explain how such an optimal movement strategy can be made to work in a distributed fashion. We demonstrate that our distributed optimal movement strategy can lead to about two times smaller loss rate than a standard random walk strategy under diverse scenarios. In particular, our strategy results in up to 70 percent cost savings for the deployment of multiple collectors to achieve the target data loss rate than the standard random walk strategy.

[1]  Sheldon M. Ross,et al.  Stochastic Processes , 2018, Gauge Integral Structures for Stochastic Calculus and Quantum Electrodynamics.

[2]  John Odentrantz,et al.  Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues , 2000, Technometrics.

[3]  Ming Zhong,et al.  The Convergence-Guaranteed Random Walk and Its Applications in Peer-to-Peer Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[4]  A SomasundaraA.,et al.  Mobile Element Scheduling for Efficient Data Collection in Wireless Sensor Networks with Dynamic Deadlines , 2004 .

[5]  Gwillerm Froc,et al.  Random walk based routing protocol for wireless sensor networks , 2007, Valuetools 2007.

[6]  Chen Avin,et al.  Efficient and robust query processing in dynamic environments using random walk techniques , 2004, Third International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2004. IPSN 2004.

[7]  Prithwish Basu,et al.  Opportunistic forwarding in wireless networks with duty cycling , 2008, CHANTS '08.

[8]  Daryl J. Daley,et al.  An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes , 2013 .

[9]  Ellen W. Zegura,et al.  Controlling the mobility of multiple data transport ferries in a delay-tolerant network , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[10]  Ellen W. Zegura,et al.  A message ferrying approach for data delivery in sparse mobile ad hoc networks , 2004, MobiHoc '04.

[11]  Vladimir Stankovic,et al.  Raptor packets: A packet-centric approach to distributed raptor code design , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[12]  Wing-Kai Hon,et al.  Detection of intelligent mobile target in a mobile sensor network , 2010, TNET.

[13]  Roger Wattenhofer,et al.  Gathering correlated data in sensor networks , 2004, DIALM-POMC '04.

[14]  W. K. Hastings,et al.  Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications , 1970 .

[15]  Sanjay Shakkottai,et al.  Asymptotics of query strategies over a sensor network , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[16]  Gwillerm Froc,et al.  Random walk based routing protocol for wireless sensor networks , 2007, ValueTools '07.

[17]  Walter Willinger,et al.  On unbiased sampling for unstructured peer-to-peer networks , 2009, TNET.

[18]  Gwillerm Froc,et al.  Design and Performance of Wireless Data Gathering Networks Based on Unicast Random Walk Routing , 2009, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[19]  Francesco Chiti,et al.  Rateless packet approach for data gathering in wireless sensor networks , 2010, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[21]  Prithwish Basu,et al.  Exact Analysis of Latency of Stateless Opportunistic Forwarding , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[22]  Ramesh Govindan,et al.  The impact of spatial correlation on routing with compression in wireless sensor networks , 2008, TOSN.

[23]  Yiwei Thomas Hou,et al.  Theoretical Results on Base Station Movement Problem for Sensor Network , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications.

[24]  Ming Zhong,et al.  Popularity-Biased Random Walks for Peer-to-Peer Search under the Square-Root Principle , 2006, IPTPS.

[25]  Gaetano Borriello,et al.  Exploiting Mobility for Energy Efficient Data Collection in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2006, Mob. Networks Appl..

[26]  Bhaskar Krishnamachari,et al.  The power of choice in random walks: An empirical study , 2008, Comput. Networks.

[27]  Ioannis Ch. Paschalidis,et al.  Improved delay-minimized data harvesting with mobile elements in wireless sensor networks , 2011, 2011 International Symposium of Modeling and Optimization of Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks.

[28]  Do Young Eun,et al.  Toward distributed optimal movement strategy for data harvesting in wireless sensor networks , 2012, 2012 9th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON).

[29]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  Neighbor discovery in wireless networks and the coupon collector's problem , 2009, MobiCom '09.

[30]  Moshe Shaked,et al.  Stochastic orders and their applications , 1994 .

[31]  Brian F. Cooper An Optimal Overlay Topology for Routing Peer-to-Peer Searches , 2005, Middleware.

[32]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[33]  Vishnu Navda,et al.  Efficient gathering of correlated data in sensor networks , 2008, TOSN.

[34]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[35]  Waylon Brunette,et al.  Data MULEs: modeling and analysis of a three-tier architecture for sparse sensor networks , 2003, Ad Hoc Networks.