Multi-User Mixed Reality Environments for Distance Learning

Technological innovation is changing every aspect of our lives and extending into education, where it is introducing profound changes to both the traditional classroom and online learning environments. This chapter explores the future of MUVEs, focusing particularly on immersive mixed reality learning environments and the challenges involved in the shift to multidimensional environments in education. It reviews the earlier developments in MUVEs and identifies a barrier to their deployment in science and engineering education: their inability to support physical collaborative laboratory work. The chapter then explains how advances in mixed-reality research may offer a solution to this problem through a case study of a cutting-edge example of such an approach, the BReal Lab, together with a summary of evaluation results gained from a trial involving students in 5 different countries. Finally, the chapter concludes by reflecting on the issues raised and speculates on possible future directions that work on mixed-reality MUVEs might take.

[1]  Victor Callaghan,et al.  BUZZ-BOARDING; PRACTICAL SUPPORT FOR TEACHING COMPUTING BASED ON THE INTERNET-OF-THINGS , 2012 .

[2]  Michael P. Clough,et al.  USING THE LABORATORY TO ENHANCE STUDENT LEARNING , 2002 .

[3]  Yoosoo Oh,et al.  Ubiquitous Virtual Reality Environments , 2013 .

[4]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  The Impacts of Emoticons on Message Interpretation in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2001 .

[5]  Jeannette Chin,et al.  A DIY approach to pervasive computing for the Internet of Things: A smart alarm clock , 2013, 2013 5th Computer Science and Electronic Engineering Conference (CEEC).

[6]  Jonathan Steuer,et al.  Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence , 1992 .

[7]  David Birchfield,et al.  Teaching and Learning in the Mixed-Reality Science Classroom , 2009 .

[8]  Wa Wijnand IJsselsteijn,et al.  History of telepresence , 2005 .

[9]  Steve Mann,et al.  EyeTap Devices for Augmented, Deliberately Diminished, or Otherwise Altered Visual Perception of Rigid Planar Patches of Real-World Scenes , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[10]  Joshua Harlan Lifton,et al.  Dual reality : an emerging medium , 2007 .

[11]  Diane J. Cook,et al.  Author's Personal Copy Pervasive and Mobile Computing Ambient Intelligence: Technologies, Applications, and Opportunities , 2022 .

[12]  Lara M. Triona,et al.  Hands on What? The Relative Effectiveness of Physical versus Virtual Materials in an Engineering Design Project by Middle School Children , 2007 .

[13]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  Learning a Foreign Language in a Mixed-Reality Environment , 2011, IEEE Internet Computing.

[14]  Hideyuki Tamura,et al.  Mixed Reality: Future Dreams Seen at the Border between Real and Virtual Worlds , 2001, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[15]  Paul J. Moore.  Learning and Teaching in Virtual Worlds: Implications of Virtual Reality for Education. , 1995 .

[16]  MaJing,et al.  Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories , 2006 .

[17]  D. J. Magin,et al.  Computer simulation of laboratory experiments: an unrealized potential , 1990 .

[18]  Michael Gardner,et al.  MiRTLE (Mixed-Reality Teaching and Learning Environment): from prototype to production and implementation , 2011 .

[19]  P. Milgram,et al.  A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays , 1994 .

[20]  Z. Zacharia,et al.  Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education , 2013, Science.

[21]  Lara M. Triona,et al.  Point and Click or Grab and Heft: Comparing the Influence of Physical and Virtual Instructional Materials on Elementary School Students' Ability to Design Experiments , 2003 .

[22]  Mark Weiser,et al.  The computer for the 21st Century , 1991, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[23]  Victor Callaghan,et al.  A Pedagogical Virtual Machine for Assembling Mobile Robot using Augmented Reality , 2016, AH.

[24]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review , 2006, CSUR.

[25]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Is Out of Sight, Out of Mind? An Empirical Study of Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Groups , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  Victor Callaghan,et al.  Embedded-Internet Devices: A Means of Realising th Pervasive Computing Vision , 2003, ICWI.

[27]  Choonsung Shin,et al.  Recent Trends in Ubiquitous Virtual Reality , 2008, 2008 International Symposium on Ubiquitous Virtual Reality.

[28]  Christos Conomis,et al.  Mixed Reality Displays , 2006 .

[29]  Orit Shaer,et al.  HoloMuse: Enhancing Engagement with Archaeological Artifacts through Gesture-Based Interaction with Holograms , 2017, TEI.

[30]  Florian Michahelles,et al.  An Architectural Approach Towards the Future Internet of Things , 2011, Architecting the Internet of Things.

[31]  Minjuan Wang,et al.  A Mixed Reality Teaching and Learning Environment , 2008, ICHL.

[32]  D. Garrison,et al.  Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[33]  Luís Gomes,et al.  Current Trends in Remote Laboratories , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[34]  Gerd Kortuem,et al.  Smart objects as building blocks for the Internet of things , 2010, IEEE Internet Computing.

[35]  Michael Gardner,et al.  The Immersive Education Laboratory: understanding affordances, structuring experiences, and creating constructivist, collaborative processes, in mixed-reality smart environments , 2014, EAI Endorsed Trans. Future Intell. Educ. Environ..

[36]  Chris Fowler,et al.  Virtual reality and learning: Where is the pedagogy? , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[37]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  Conceptual change in science and in science education , 1989, Synthese.

[38]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  PhyMEL-WS: Physically Experiencing the Virtual World. Insights into Mixed Reality and Flow State on Board a Wheelchair Simulator , 2014, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[39]  Jody Clarke-Midura,et al.  Multi-user virtual environments for teaching and learning , 2007 .

[40]  Brett E. Shelton,et al.  Design and Development of Virtual Reality: Analysis of Challenges Faced by Educators , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[41]  Guido Makransky,et al.  Improving biotech education through gamified laboratory simulations , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[42]  Sherry L. Piezon,et al.  Online Groups and Social Loafing: Understanding Student-Group Interactions , 2005 .

[43]  Andrew Nafalski,et al.  Remote laboratories versus virtual and real laboratories , 2003, 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003..

[44]  Theodore F. Wiesner,et al.  Comparison of Student Learning in Physical and Simulated Unit Operations Experiments , 2004 .

[45]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  The Evolution of Research on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2009 .

[46]  David Birchfield,et al.  A Next Gen Interface for Embodied Learning: SMALLab and the Geological Layer Cake , 2010, Int. J. Gaming Comput. Mediat. Simulations.

[47]  Michael Gardner,et al.  Remote Mixed Reality Collaborative Laboratory Activities: Learning Activities within the InterReality Portal , 2012, 2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.

[48]  Michael Gardner,et al.  MiRTLE: a mixed reality teaching & learning environment , 2009 .

[49]  Chris Dede,et al.  The Evolution of Constructivist Learning Environments : Immersion in Distributed , Virtual Worlds , 1995 .

[50]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  A multidimensional analysis of trends in educational technology , 2014, 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings.

[51]  Jiejie Zhu,et al.  Virtual Reality and Mixed Reality for Virtual Learning Environments , 2006, Edutainment.

[52]  Robb Lindgren,et al.  Supporting children's learning with body-based metaphors in a mixed reality environment , 2011, IDC.

[53]  Jamie Kirkley,et al.  Creating next generation blended learning environments using mixed reality, Video Games and Simulations , 2005 .

[54]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  The use of a computer simulation to promote conceptual change: A quasi-experimental study , 2010, Comput. Educ..