The Vegetation Structure Perpendicular Index for Wildfire Severity and Forest Recovery Monitoring

The intensity of a wildfire depends in large part on the fuel available to the fire, including surface bark, leaf litter, and over- and understorey vegetation. The amount and configuration of these fuels are affected by cycles of destruction during fires and slow regrowth. Current fuel amounts, required for predictions of future fires, are therefore difficult to quantify as past fire history and fuel recovery must be taken into account. Most fire services rely on visual inspections of forest recovery, however, these are often subjective and very labour-intensive. Remote sensing offers an automated alternative with the potential for rapidly assessing fuel state over large areas allowing for continuous monitoring over time. This paper describes a new index for measuring temporal fuel state, called the Vegetation Structure Perpendicular Index (VSPI). The index provides an alternative to the Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR), which is prone to potentially large uncertainties due to large levels of seasonal dynamics. The VSPI estimates a vertically integrated burn severity and ecosystem recovery measurement for forested areas. The method is applied in this paper to a fire in Western Australia, the 2005 Perth Hills fire to demonstrate the capabilities and benefits of this new index. For this fire the VSPI provides a better estimate of fire severity and shows fuel disturbance levels for two years longer than the NBR, providing an improved estimation for post-fire vegetation recovery and vegetation condition assessment suitable for fire predictions.

[1]  Lisa M. Holsinger,et al.  Influences of prior wildfires on vegetation response to subsequent fire in a reburned Southwestern landscape. , 2016, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[2]  Fire behaviour during the Pickering Brook wildfire, January 2005 (Perth Hills Fires 71-80). , 2010 .

[3]  Chengquan Huang,et al.  Global, 30-m resolution continuous fields of tree cover: Landsat-based rescaling of MODIS vegetation continuous fields with lidar-based estimates of error , 2013, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[4]  David P. Roy,et al.  Remote sensing of fire severity: assessing the performance of the normalized burn ratio , 2006, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[5]  Carl H. Key,et al.  Landscape Assessment ( LA ) Sampling and Analysis Methods , 2004 .

[6]  W. Mccaw Characteristics of jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) forest at FORESTCHECK monitoring sites in south-west Western Australia: stand structure, litter, woody debris, soil and foliar nutrients , 2011 .

[7]  D. Jupp,et al.  A physics-based atmospheric and BRDF correction for Landsat data over mountainous terrain , 2012 .

[8]  C. Chafer,et al.  A comparison of fire severity measures: An Australian example and implications for predicting major areas of soil erosion , 2008 .

[9]  Shanti Reddy,et al.  An Evaluation of the Use of Atmospheric and BRDF Correction to Standardize Landsat Data , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[10]  G. Asner Biophysical and Biochemical Sources of Variability in Canopy Reflectance , 1998 .

[11]  Zhiliang Zhu,et al.  The spatial variation in forest burn severity in Heilongjiang Province, China , 2016, Natural Hazards.

[12]  Stuart Matthews,et al.  Behind the flaming zone: Predicting woody fuel consumption in eucalypt forest fires in southern Australia , 2011 .

[13]  James E. McMurtrey,et al.  Remote sensing the spatial distribution of crop residues , 2005 .

[14]  Stefan W. Maier,et al.  Spectral analysis of fire severity in north Australian tropical savannas , 2013 .