Effects of Self-Avatar and Gaze on Avoidance Movement Behavior

The present study investigates users' movement behavior in a virtual environment when they attempted to avoid a virtual character. At each iteration of the experiment, four conditions (Self-Avatar LookAt, No Self-Avatar LookAt, Self-Avatar No LookAt, and No Self-Avatar No LookAt) were applied to examine users' movement behavior based on kinematic measures. During the experiment, 52 participants were asked to walk from a starting position to a target position. A virtual character was placed at the midpoint. Participants were asked to wear a head-mounted display throughout the task, and their locomotion was captured using a motion capture suit. We analyzed the captured trajectories of the participants' routes on four kinematic measures to explore whether the four experimental conditions influenced the paths they took. The results indicated that the Self-Avatar LookAt condition affected the path the participants chose more significantly than the other three conditions in terms of length, duration, and deviation, but not in terms of speed. Overall, the length and duration of the task, as well as the deviation of the trajectory from the straight line, were greater when a self-avatar represented participants. An additional effect on kinematic measures was found in the LookAt (Gaze) conditions. Implications for future research are discussed.

[1]  Christos Mousas,et al.  The effects of appearance and motion of virtual characters on emotional reactivity , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[3]  K. Vogeley,et al.  From gaze cueing to dual eye-tracking: Novel approaches to investigate the neural correlates of gaze in social interaction , 2013, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[4]  Jean-Paul Laumond,et al.  The formation of trajectories during goal‐oriented locomotion in humans. II. A maximum smoothness model , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[5]  Ifigeneia Mavridou,et al.  Altering User Movement Behaviour in Virtual Environments , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[6]  Lori Ann Vallis,et al.  Locomotor adjustments for circumvention of an obstacle in the travel path , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Timing and distance characteristics of interpersonal coordination during locomotion , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[8]  Maud Marchal,et al.  Kinematic Evaluation of Virtual Walking Trajectories , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[9]  C. Kleinke.  Gaze and eye contact: a research review. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Kenton R Kaufman,et al.  Spatiotemporal gait deviations in a virtual reality environment. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[11]  Alexandra Kirsch,et al.  Strategies of locomotor collision avoidance. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[12]  J. Hermsdörfer,et al.  Influence of person- and situation-specific characteristics on collision avoidance behavior in human locomotion. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Brett R. Fajen,et al.  Behavioral Dynamics of Visually Guided Locomotion , 2008 .

[14]  Victoria Interrante,et al.  Seven League Boots: A New Metaphor for Augmented Locomotion through Moderately Large Scale Immersive Virtual Environments , 2007, 2007 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces.

[15]  Julien Pettré,et al.  Effect of Virtual Human Gaze Behaviour During an Orthogonal Collision Avoidance Walking Task , 2018, 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR).

[16]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  CyberWalk: Enabling unconstrained omnidirectional walking through virtual environments , 2008, ACM Trans. Appl. Percept..

[17]  Andrea Bönsch,et al.  Collision avoidance in the presence of a virtual agent in small-scale virtual environments , 2016, 2016 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

[18]  Anouk Lamontagne,et al.  Healthy young adults implement distinctive avoidance strategies while walking and circumventing virtual human vs. non-human obstacles in a virtual environment. , 2018, Gait & posture.

[19]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  PedVR: simulating gaze-based interactions between a real user and virtual crowds , 2016, VRST.

[20]  Diana Adler,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 2016 .

[21]  Maud Marchal,et al.  Walking in a Cube: Novel Metaphors for Safely Navigating Large Virtual Environments in Restricted Real Workspaces , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[22]  Philip W. Fink,et al.  Obstacle avoidance during walking in real and virtual environments , 2007, TAP.

[23]  Anne-Hélène Olivier,et al.  Walking with Virtual People: Evaluation of Locomotion Interfaces in Dynamic Environments , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[24]  C. Richards,et al.  The negotiation of stationary and moving obstructions during walking: anticipatory locomotor adaptations and preservation of personal space. , 2005, Motor control.

[25]  Jean-Paul Laumond,et al.  Optimizing principles underlying the shape of trajectories in goal oriented locomotion for humans , 2006, 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[26]  Bradford J McFadyen,et al.  Characteristics of personal space during obstacle circumvention in physical and virtual environments. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[27]  T. Flash,et al.  Velocity and curvature in human locomotion along complex curved paths: a comparison with hand movements , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  S. Coren.  The lateral preference inventory for measurement of handedness, footedness, eyedness, and earedness: Norms for young adults , 1993 .

[29]  J. Pettré,et al.  Minimal predicted distance: a common metric for collision avoidance during pairwise interactions between walkers. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[30]  Sharif Razzaque,et al.  Comparing VE locomotion interfaces , 2005, IEEE Proceedings. VR 2005. Virtual Reality, 2005..

[31]  Pascal Savard,et al.  A comparative study of four input devices for desktop virtual walkthroughs , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  Julien Pettré,et al.  Collision avoidance between two walkers: role-dependent strategies. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[33]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[34]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Experimental study of the behavioural mechanisms underlying self-organization in human crowds , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  M. L. Plume,et al.  SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) , 2002, Encyclopedia of Information Systems.

[36]  Hiroo Iwata,et al.  Path Reproduction Tests Using a Torus Treadmill , 1999, Presence.

[37]  Stefan Glasauer,et al.  Adjustments of Speed and Path when Avoiding Collisions with Another Pedestrian , 2014, PloS one.

[38]  Aftab E Patla,et al.  Locomotor avoidance behaviours during a visually guided task involving an approaching object. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[39]  J. Hietanen,et al.  I'll Walk This Way: Eyes Reveal the Direction of Locomotion and Make Passersby Look and Go the Other Way , 2009, Psychological science.

[40]  S. Holm.  A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[41]  Sabarish V. Babu,et al.  Comparison of path visualizations and cognitive measures relative to travel technique in a virtual environment , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[42]  Gerd Bruder,et al.  Virtual proxemics: Locomotion in the presence of obstacles in large immersive projection environments , 2015, 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[43]  David C. Brogan,et al.  Realistic human walking paths , 2003, Proceedings 11th IEEE International Workshop on Program Comprehension.

[44]  Aftab E Patla,et al.  What visual information is used for navigation around obstacles in a cluttered environment? , 2004, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[45]  J. Loomis,et al.  Interpersonal Distance in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.