Background In neuroanesthesia practice, muscle relaxants may at times need to be avoided to facilitate intraoperative motor pathway monitoring. Our study's objective was to determine the optimal dose of remifentanil required to prevent movement after neurosurgical stimulation. Methods After Institutional Review Board approval and written informed consent, 132 patients undergoing elective craniotomy randomly received one of 12 remifentanil dose regimens (0.10 to 0.21 μg/kg/min). Remifentanil was started before induction with propofol and succinylcholine. Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane (0.6% end-tidal) in air/oxygen. During the study, movement was assessed on predetermined criteria by the anesthesiology, nursing, and neurosurgical teams. Heart rate and blood pressure were recorded every 5 minutes. We assessed the relationship between movement, hypotension, bradycardia, and dose using probit analysis and logistic regression. Results Sixty-five percent of the patients moved in response to surgical stimuli [95% confidence interval (CI): 49%-79%] at a remifentanil infusion rate of 0.10 μg/kg/min, and movement decreased to 21% (95% CI: 11-35) at 0.21 μg/kg/min. The probability of movement was 50% at an infusion rate (95% CI) of 0.13 (0.10 to 0.15) μg/kg/min remifentanil and decreased to 25% at an infusion rate of 0.19 (0.17 to 0.29) μg/kg/min. The probability of hypotension and bradycardia was 50% at 0.13 (0.10 to 0.15) μg/kg/min and 0.17 (0.15 to 0.21) μg/kg/min, respectively. Conclusions Higher doses of remifentanil lessen the risk of movement in the absence of muscle relaxants with surgical stimulation for elective craniotomy. Hypotension and bradycardia were common at higher doses. Even at the maximum dose (0.21 mcg/kg/min) there was a 20% chance of movement. Adjunctive therapy is needed to ablate movement reliably, and to counteract the hypotensive effect of remifentanil. These findings may be helpful for clinicians administering remifentanil and isoflurane during procedures, where muscle relaxants may not be desirable.
[1]
I. Barker,et al.
A comparison of intubating conditions in children following induction of anaesthesia with propofol and suxamethonium or propofol and remifentanil
,
2007,
Anaesthesia.
[2]
A. Bekar,et al.
A Comparison of Effects of Alfentanil, Fentanyl, and Remifentanil on Hemodynamic and Respiratory Parameters During Stereotactic Brain Biopsy
,
2006,
Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology.
[3]
P. Mulder,et al.
Remifentanil‐sevoflurane anaesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of three dose regimens
,
2002,
Anaesthesia.
[4]
E. Rackow,et al.
Effects of perfusion pressure on tissue perfusion in septic shock
,
2000,
Critical care medicine.
[5]
P. Sebel,et al.
Awareness during Anesthesia
,
2000,
Anesthesiology.
[6]
P. Sebel,et al.
Reduction of Isoflurane Minimal Alveolar Concentration by Remifentanil
,
1996,
Anesthesiology.
[7]
E. Eger,et al.
Determination and applications of MAC.
,
1980,
Anesthesiology.
[8]
Carisoprodol Soma,et al.
[Muscle relaxants].
,
1980,
Klinische Anasthesiologie und Intensivtherapie.
[9]
Philip D. Woodbridge,et al.
CHANGING CONCEPTS CONCERNING DEPTH OF ANESTHESIAE
,
1957
.
[10]
P D WOODBRIDGE,et al.
CHANGING CONCEPTS CONCERNING DEPTH OF ANESTHESIA
,
1957,
Anesthesiology.