Million Dollar Question: What is the Most Effective and Equitable Way to Deliver Services to Advanced Learners?

School district administrators must address structural racism and inequitable access to advanced learning opportunities in their school districts. District administrators in one large district in the northwestern part of the United States sought research-based advice by asking the authors to provide the answer to the “million-dollar” question, “ What is the most effective and equitable way to deliver services to advanced learners?” This paper shares the response provided to the school district and discusses the complexity of the question. Based on a systematic literature review of best practices in the field of gifted education, we share our findings in three categories: (1) administrative structures, (2) pedagogy of gifted education, and (3) social and emotional considerations for advanced learners. We conclude by offering recommendations drawn from this review to develop a holistic view of programming and serving all students with advanced academic needs.

[1]  Del Siegle.  Technology: The Dark Side of Using Technology , 2017 .

[2]  Nancy B. Hertzog.  Designing the Learning Context in School for Talent Development , 2017 .

[3]  Matthew C. Makel,et al.  What One Hundred Years of Research Says About the Effects of Ability Grouping and Acceleration on K–12 Students’ Academic Achievement , 2016 .

[4]  I. Jackson,et al.  Daring to care: the role of culturally relevant care in mentoring Black and Latino male high school students , 2016 .

[5]  F. Preckel,et al.  Big fish in big ponds: Contrast and assimilation effects on math and verbal self-concepts of students in within-school gifted tracks. , 2016, The British journal of educational psychology.

[6]  S. Peters.  The Bright Versus Gifted Comparison , 2016 .

[7]  M. Kim,et al.  Successful Latina Scientists and Engineers , 2015 .

[8]  R. Subotnik,et al.  Conceptualizations of Giftedness and the Development of Talent: Implications for Counselors , 2015 .

[9]  Nancy B. Hertzog,et al.  Outcomes for Students on a Fast Track to College: Early College Entrance Programs at the University of Washington , 2015 .

[10]  C. Barber,et al.  A Comparison of Adolescents’ Friendship Networks by Advanced Coursework Participation Status , 2015 .

[11]  A. Topcu,et al.  The Role of E-Mentoring in Mathematically Gifted Students’ Academic Life , 2014 .

[12]  B. Bicknell.  Parental Roles in the Education of Mathematically Gifted and Talented Children , 2014 .

[13]  A. A. Nanavati,et al.  Like-minded communities: bringing the familiarity and similarity together , 2012, World Wide Web.

[14]  J. Vantassel-Baska.  Curriculum Issues , 2012 .

[15]  Z. Shechtman,et al.  Social Competencies and Difficulties of Gifted Children Compared to Nongifted Peers , 2012 .

[16]  J. Peterson,et al.  Student Response to a Small-Group Affective Curriculum in a School for Gifted Children , 2011 .

[17]  Joyce VanTassel-Baska,et al.  The Integrated Curriculum Model (ICM) , 2010 .

[18]  Sandra J. Manning,et al.  Valuing the Advanced Learner: Differentiating Up , 2010 .

[19]  Holly L. Hertberg-Davis.  Myth 7: Differentiation in the Regular Classroom Is Equivalent to Gifted Programs and Is Sufficient , 2009 .

[20]  J. Peterson.  Myth 17: Gifted and Talented Individuals Do Not Have Unique Social and Emotional Needs , 2009 .

[21]  H. Marsh,et al.  Earning Its Place as a Pan-Human Theory: Universality of the Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect across 41 Culturally and Economically Diverse Countries. , 2009 .

[22]  Maureen Neihart.  The Socioaffective Impact of Acceleration and Ability Grouping , 2007 .

[23]  Linda D. Avery,et al.  A Study of Curriculum Effectiveness in Social Studies , 2007 .

[24]  Karen B. Rogers,et al.  Lessons Learned About Educating the Gifted and Talented , 2007 .

[25]  Joyce VanTassel-Baska,et al.  Toward Best Practice , 2007 .

[26]  M. Levine,et al.  Teaching War and Violence to the Like-Minded , 2005 .

[27]  A. Feng,et al.  A longitudinal assessment of gifted students’ learning using the integrated curriculum model (ICM): Impacts and perceptions of the William and Mary language arts and science curriculum , 2004 .

[28]  Tonya R. Moon,et al.  Differentiating Instruction in Response to Student Readiness, Interest, and Learning Profile in Academically Diverse Classrooms: A Review of Literature , 2003 .

[29]  Carol L. Tieso.  Ability grouping is not just tracking anymore , 2003 .

[30]  Adam Gamoran,et al.  The Production of Achievement Inequality in High School English , 2002 .

[31]  Linda D. Avery,et al.  A Curriculum Study of Gifted-Student Learning in the Language Arts , 2002 .

[32]  Lynn G. Beck.  Mentorships: Benefits and Effects on Career Development , 1989 .

[33]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept , 1987 .

[34]  Mieke Goos,et al.  The effect of class composition by gender and ability on secondary school students’ school well-being and academic self-concept: A literature review , 2012 .

[35]  V. Braun,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Qualitative Research in Psychology Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology , 2022 .