Shape specificity of neural persistence for the kinetic-depth effect matches perceptual adaptation but not sensory memory

When multistable displays—stimuli that are compatible with several comparably likely perceptual interpretations—are presented intermittently, the perceptual state at the stimulus onset shows a complex dependence on the duration of the preceding blank interval. Specifically, perception is maximally destabilized for interruptions that are approximately 500 ms long, but it is stabilized by the use of shorter or longer blank intervals. This nonmonotonic dependence of perceptual stability on the blank interval duration raises questions about a number of history effects that are involved and about their nature, including the underlying neural representations. One way to characterize history effects is by looking at their specificity to the change of display properties. Here we measured the shape specificity for perception of the kinetic-depth effect when interruptions were brief (50 ms). For this time interval, perception is thought to be stabilized by neural persistence, a lingering trace of the prior neural activity. We found that perceptual stability depended on the shapes of the objects presented both before and after the break, but not on the similarity between the objects. These results matched earlier reports of the shape specificity of neural adaptation (destabilizing aftereffect for blanks 200–800 ms long). However, our results were markedly different from the shape specificity of sensory memory of multistable perception (a stabilizing effect for blanks > 800–1,000 ms). We concluded that whereas neural persistence and adaptation both act on the same motion-selective neural representation, sensory memory depends on another, possibly partially overlapping, shape-selective neural ensemble.

[1]  A. Parker,et al.  Perceptually Bistable Three-Dimensional Figures Evoke High Choice Probabilities in Cortical Area MT , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  R. van Ee,et al.  Early interactions between neuronal adaptation and voluntary control determine perceptual choices in bistable vision. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[3]  T. Knapen,et al.  The spatial scale of perceptual memory in ambiguous figure perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[4]  Joel Pearson,et al.  Determinants of visual awareness following interruptions during rivalry. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[5]  A. Pastukhov Perception and the strongest sensory memory trace of multi-stable displays both form shortly after the stimulus onset , 2016, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[6]  R. van Ee,et al.  Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: a low-level neural model. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[7]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Visual Sensory Memory , 2008 .

[8]  G. Orban,et al.  Extracting 3D from Motion: Differences in Human and Monkey Intraparietal Cortex , 2002, Science.

[9]  A. V. van den Berg,et al.  Flash suppression and flash facilitation in binocular rivalry. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[10]  J. Braun,et al.  Perceptual adaptation to structure-from-motion depends on the size of adaptor and probe objects, but not on the similarity of their shapes , 2014, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[11]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[12]  Nava Rubin,et al.  The dynamics of bi-stable alternation in ambiguous motion displays: a fresh look at plaids , 2003, Vision Research.

[13]  R. Parasuraman,et al.  What you see depends on what you saw, and what else you saw: The interactions between motion priming and object priming , 2014, Vision Research.

[14]  Alexander Maier,et al.  Perception of Temporally Interleaved Ambiguous Patterns , 2003, Current Biology.

[15]  Michael Bach,et al.  Early neural activity in Necker-cube reversal: evidence for low-level processing of a gestalt phenomenon. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[16]  David E. Irwin,et al.  On the Relations among Different Measures of Visible and Informational Persistence , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  R. van Ee,et al.  Visual Cortex Allows Prediction of Perceptual States during Ambiguous Structure-From-Motion , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  M. Webster,et al.  Visual adaptation: Neural, psychological and computational aspects , 2007, Vision Research.

[20]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Iconic memory and visible persistence , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Visual Motion Retards Alternations between Conflicting Perceptual Interpretations , 2003, Neuron.

[22]  B. Butler,et al.  Spatiotopic and retinotopic components of iconic memory , 1987, Psychological research.

[23]  J. Gray,et al.  PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy , 2019, Behavior Research Methods.

[24]  Tutis Vilis,et al.  The lateral occipital complex subserves the perceptual persistence of motion-defined groupings. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  Tomas Knapen,et al.  Opposite Influence of Perceptual Memory on Initial and Prolonged Perception of Sensory Ambiguity , 2012, PloS one.

[26]  G. Orban The extraction of 3D shape in the visual system of human and nonhuman primates. , 2011, Annual review of neuroscience.

[27]  A. V. van den Berg,et al.  Multi-Timescale Perceptual History Resolves Visual Ambiguity , 2008, PloS one.

[28]  Jochen Braun,et al.  Contrast thresholds for component motion with full and poor attention. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[29]  Agostino Di Ciaccio,et al.  Advanced Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Large Data-Sets: Studies in Theoretical and Applied Statistics , 2012 .

[30]  R. Blake,et al.  Neural bases of binocular rivalry , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  Casper J. Erkelens,et al.  The Role of Temporally Coarse Form Processing during Binocular Rivalry , 2008, PloS one.

[32]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[34]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Some temporal characteristics of visual pattern perception. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  Boris Crassini,et al.  Binocular rivalry occurs without simultaneous presentation of rival stimuli , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  Haishan Yao,et al.  Duality in Binocular Rivalry: Distinct Sensitivity of Percept Sequence and Percept Duration to Imbalance between Monocular Stimuli , 2009, PloS one.

[37]  Claus-Christian Carbon,et al.  Out of sight, out of mind: Occlusion and eye closure destabilize moving bistable structure-from-motion displays , 2018, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[38]  Alexander Pastukhov,et al.  A short-term memory of multi-stable perception. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[39]  J. Braun,et al.  Sensory memory of structure-from-motion is shape-specific , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.