Intelligent Testing Strategies for Chemicals Testing — A Case of More Haste, Less Speed?

The prospects for using (Q)SAR modelling, read-across (chemical) and other non-animal approaches as part of integrated testing strategies for chemical risk assessment, within the framework of the EU REACH legislation, are considered. The potential advantages and limitations of (Q)SAR modelling and read-across methods for chemical regulatory risk assessment are reviewed. It is concluded that it would be premature to base a testing strategy on chemical-based computational modelling approaches, until such time as criteria to validate them for their reliability and relevance by using independent and transparent procedures, have been agreed. This is mainly because of inherent problems in validating and accepting (Q)SARs for regulatory use in ways that are analogous to those that have been developed and applied for in vitro tests. Until this issue has been resolved, it is recommended that testing strategies should be developed which comprise the integrated use of computational and read-across approaches. These should be applied in a cautious and judicious way, in association with available tissue culture methods, and in conjunction with metabolism and biokinetic studies. Such strategies should be intelligently applied by being driven by exposure information (based on bioavailability, not merely on production volume) and hazard information needs, in preference to a tick-box approach. In the meantime, there should be increased efforts to develop improved (Q)SARs, expert systems and new in vitro methods, and, in particular, ways to expedite their validation and acceptance must be found and prospectively agreed with all major stakeholders.

[1]  Robert Combes,et al.  Toxicity testing: creating a revolution based on new technologies. , 2005, Trends in biotechnology.

[2]  E. Hulzebos,et al.  (Q)SARS: gatekeepers against risk on chemicals? , 2003, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[3]  Mark T. D. Cronin,et al.  A Framework for Promoting the Acceptance and Regulatory Use of ( Quantitative) Structure- Activity Relationships , 2004 .

[4]  W Wutke.  Multi-organic risk assessment--summary of a CREDO cluster workshop. , 2004, Toxicology.

[5]  Joanna Jaworska,et al.  Improving Opportunities for Regulatory Acceptance of QSARs: The Importance of Model Domain, Uncertainty, Validity and Predictability , 2003 .

[6]  Maykel Pérez González,et al.  A topological substructural approach applied to the computational prediction of rodent carcinogenicity. , 2005, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[7]  Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg,et al.  Prediction of biodegradability from chemical structure: Modeling of ready biodegradation test data , 1999 .

[8]  Horst Spielmann,et al.  Animal testing and alternative approaches for the human health risk assessment under the proposed new European chemicals regulation , 2004, Archives of Toxicology.

[9]  J W Bridges,et al.  Integrated risk assessment and endocrine disrupters. , 2004, Toxicology.

[10]  John D. Walker,et al.  Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.

[11]  Maykel Pérez González,et al.  The Prediction of Carcinogenicity from Molecular Structure , 2005 .

[12]  A. Worth,et al.  The prospects for using (Q)SARs in a changing political environment--high expectations and a key role for the european commission's joint research centre , 2004, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[13]  A P Worth,et al.  The role of the European centre for the validation of alternative methods (ECVAM) in the validation of (Q)SARs , 2004, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[14]  John M Frazier.  A theoretical model for simulating the outcome of mechanism based in vitro toxicity testing strategies. , 2004, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[15]  U. Tillmann,et al.  A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. , 1997, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[16]  J B Houston,et al.  In vitro human tissue models in risk assessment: report of a consensus-building workshop. , 2001, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[17]  S Dimitrov,et al.  In silico modelling of hazard endpoints: current problems and perspectives , 2003, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.