Broadband electrocardiogram acquisition for improved suppression of MRI gradient artifacts.

Despite being routinely acquired during MRI examination for triggering or monitoring purposes, the Electrocardiogram (ECG) signal recording and analysis remain challenging due to the inherent magnetic environment of an MRI scanner. The ECG signals are particularly distorted by the induction of electrical fields in the body by the MRI gradients. In this study, we proposed a new hardware and software solution for the acquisition of an ECG signal during MRI up to 3T. Instead of restricting the sensor bandwidth to limit these gradient artifacts, the new sensor architecture consisted in a higher bandwidth, higher sampling frequency and larger input dynamics, in order to acquire more precisely the ECG signals and the gradient artifacts. A signal processing based on a novelty detection algorithm and a blanking was then applied for improved artifact suppression. The proposed sensor allowed acquiring the gradient artifacts more precisely, and these artifacts were recorded with peak-to-peak amplitudes two orders of magnitude larger than QRS complexes. The proposed method outperformed a state-of-the-art approach both in terms of signal quality (+9% "SNR") and accuracy of QRS detection (+11%). The proposed hardware and software solutions opens the way for the acquisition of high-quality of ECG gating in MRI, and diagnostic quality ECG signals in MRI.

[1]  Frank G. Shellock Magnetic Resonance Procedures: Health Effects and Safety , 2000 .

[2]  D. Firmin,et al.  Motion in cardiovascular MR imaging. , 2009, Radiology.

[3]  Jacques Felblinger,et al.  Adaptive step size LMS improves ECG detection during MRI at 1.5 and 3 T , 2017, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[4]  Gari D Clifford,et al.  Acquisition of electrocardiogram signals during magnetic resonance imaging , 2017, Physiological measurement.

[5]  Olivier Pietquin,et al.  A specific QRS detector for electrocardiography during MRI: Using wavelets and local regularity characterization , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[6]  R. Kreis,et al.  Restoration of electrophysiological signals distorted by inductive effects of magnetic field gradients during MR sequences , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Zion Tsz Ho Tse,et al.  Gradient‐induced voltages on 12‐lead ECGs during high duty‐cycle MRI sequences and a method for their removal considering linear and concomitant gradient terms , 2016, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  Joris Pascal,et al.  Capteur ECG intelligent pour la synchronisation des séquences en IRM et le monitorage des patients , 2011 .

[9]  C H Lorenz,et al.  Novel real‐time R‐wave detection algorithm based on the vectorcardiogram for accurate gated magnetic resonance acquisitions , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Roger Abächerli,et al.  Independent component analysis-based artefact reduction: application to the electrocardiogram for improved magnetic resonance imaging triggering , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[11]  Roger Abächerli,et al.  Noise Cancellation Signal Processing Method and Computer System for Improved Real-Time Electrocardiogram Artifact Correction During MRI Data Acquisition , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Kanishka Ratnayaka,et al.  Adaptive noise cancellation to suppress electrocardiography artifacts during real‐time interventional MRI , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  R E Wendt,et al.  Monitoring of acutely III patients during nuclear magnetic resonance imaging: Use of a Time‐varying filter electrocardiographic gating device to reduce gradient artifacts , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  J. Keltner,et al.  Magnetohydrodynamics of blood flow , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Georg Rose,et al.  Filtering of ECG signals distorted by magnetic field gradients during MRI using non-linear filters and higher-order statistics , 2018, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[16]  R Bowtell,et al.  Measurement of electric fields due to time-varying magnetic field gradients using dipole probes , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Freddy Odille,et al.  Reconstruction of the 12‐lead ECG using a novel MR‐compatible ECG sensor network , 2019, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Thomas J. Pohida,et al.  Physiological Recording in the MRI Environment (PRiME): MRI-Compatible Hemodynamic Recording System , 2018, IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine.

[19]  J Felblinger,et al.  Electrocardiogram acquisition during MR examinations for patient monitoring and sequence triggering , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Olivier Pietquin,et al.  Nonlinear Bayesian Filtering for Denoising of Electrocardiograms Acquired in a Magnetic Resonance Environment , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  J. Felblinger,et al.  Suppression of MR gradient artefacts on electrophysiological signals based on an adaptive real-time filter with LMS coefficient updates , 2004, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[22]  R. Frayne,et al.  Minimizing interference from magnetic resonance imagers during electrocardiography , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  Gari D Clifford,et al.  ECG-based gating in ultra high field cardiovascular magnetic resonance using an independent component analysis approach , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[24]  Martin Bencsik,et al.  Electric fields induced in the human body by time-varying magnetic field gradients in MRI: numerical calculations and correlation analysis , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.