Field measurement of reflectance: some major considerations.

Success in determining when, whether, and in what conditions to acquire remote sensing data for describing a given target (e.g., vegetation) is contingent on understanding the reflectance properties of the target and its surroundings. Unfortunately, relatively little information on the reflectance properties of the earth's surface exists in the literature. Field measurements of a target's reflectance are usually made with single-beam instruments by sequentially viewing the target and a white standard reflector, which is assumed to be Lam-bertian. Because variations in atmospheric transmission can occur between the times of measuring the target and reflector, substantial errors in reflectance calculated from these measurements may result. To avoid these errors the irradiance on and radiance from the target must be measured simultaneously. Measurements of the spectral hemispherical-conical reflectance of vegetative canopies were made by simultaneously measuring irradiance and radiance with pairs of portable spectroradiometers. The procedures for calibrating the instruments and for collecting and analyzing spectral reflectance data are described. Major instrumental sources of error and their magnitude are discussed as are problems involved in making such measurements.

[1]  G. Suits The calculation of the directional reflectance of a vegetative canopy , 1971 .

[2]  M. Duggin Likely effects of solar elevation on the quantification of changes in vegetation with maturity using sequential Landsat imagery. , 1977, Applied optics.

[3]  E. L. Gray,et al.  Optical reflection properties of natural surfaces , 1965 .

[4]  M J Duggin,et al.  Simultaneous measurement of irradiance and reflected radiance in field determination of special reflectance. , 1981, Applied optics.

[5]  Edward J. Milton,et al.  A portable multiband radiometer for ground data collection in remote sensing , 1980 .

[6]  J. Colwell Vegetation canopy reflectance , 1974 .

[7]  E. Lemaster,et al.  Plant canopy light absorption model with application to wheat. , 1978, Applied optics.

[8]  Kriebel Kt,et al.  Measured spectral bidirectional reflection properties of four vegetated surfaces. , 1978 .

[9]  Kinsell L. Coulson,et al.  Effects of reflection properties of natural surfaces in aerial reconnaissance. , 1966, Applied optics.

[10]  F. E. Nicodemus,et al.  Geometrical considerations and nomenclature for reflectance , 1977 .

[11]  Gwynn H. Suits,et al.  The cause of azimuthal variations in directional reflectance of vegetative canopies , 1971 .

[12]  K. Kriebel,et al.  Average variability of the radiation reflected by vegetated surfaces due to differing irradiations , 1978 .

[13]  M. Duggin Effect of instrument spectral response on use of the Landsat MSS for vegetative disease assessment. , 1980, Applied optics.

[14]  E. Lemaster,et al.  Suits reflectance models for wheat and cotton: theoretical and experimental tests. , 1977, Applied optics.

[15]  G. Suits,et al.  Verification of a reflectance model for mature corn with applications to corn blight detection , 1971 .