Selecting the optimum engineering model for the frequency response of fcc nanowire resonators

Abstract The full potential of the nanoelectromechanical systems, NEMS, as one of the leading examples among the new-generation sensing technologies, is yet to be realized. One of the main challenges on the road is the mechanical modeling of their core elements, the tiny mechanical building blocks such as the nanowire resonators. The success of the engineering design of such miniaturized systems will depend heavily on the availability of accurate mechanistic models with the least possible computational cost. Although a variety of models are available for this purpose, the boundaries between their admissible domains remain rather vague. For example, analytical approaches including Euler–Bernoulli and Timoshenko beam theories provide closed-form solutions and work reasonably well for moderate nanowire geometries, and hence, they are frequently utilized in the literature. However, their validity in the case of extreme surface-to-volume ratios remains questionable. Classical finite element method can partially be used to address these deficiencies. On the other hand, molecular dynamics provide accurate results, while nanowire geometries studied with this computationally demanding technique usually remain confined to dimensions below those of practical interest. To address these issues, a benchmarking study among analytical and numerical techniques is carried out, where Surface Cauchy–Born theory serves as the reference. Using gold nanowires with different dimensions and boundary conditions, it is observed that analytical models are applicable within a length-to-thickness ratio range of 7–11 in the fixed–fixed configuration, whereas they can be used safely within a length-to-thickness ratio range of less than 25 in the fixed–free configuration. Deviations as high as 50% are encountered for length-to-thickness ratios exceeding 11 for both the analytical approach and the classical finite element method in the fixed–fixed structure. The deviations are quantitatively linked to the dominance of the surface effect through the use of the Surface Cauchy–Born model. For length-to-thickness ratios less than 7, the lack of cross-sectional deformations in analytical treatment is also observed to lead to high deviations for the fixed–fixed configuration through the comparison with higher-order beam theories. Results are verified with silver nanowires as well. The work provides a guideline for selecting the optimum mechanical model given the nanowire resonator dimensions and boundary conditions.

[1]  A. Ionescu,et al.  Very high frequency double-ended tuning fork nano-mechanical Fin-FET resonator , 2011, 2011 16th International Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference.

[2]  J. R. Hutchinson.  Shear coefficients for Timoshenko beam theory , 2001 .

[3]  Harold S. Park,et al.  Shape memory and pseudoelasticity in metal nanowires. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[4]  Xi-Qiao Feng,et al.  Surface effects on buckling of nanowires under uniaxial compression , 2009 .

[5]  Harold S. Park,et al.  A continuum model for the mechanical behavior of nanowires including surface and surface-induced initial stresses , 2011 .

[6]  Harold S. Park,et al.  Surface stress effects on the resonant properties of metal nanowires: The importance of finite deformation kinematics and the impact of the residual surface stress , 2008 .

[7]  J. N. Reddy,et al.  Relationships between bending solutions of classical and shear deformation beam theories , 1997 .

[8]  P. G. Gucciardi,et al.  Femtonewton force sensing with optically trapped nanotubes. , 2008, Nano letters.

[9]  Foiles,et al.  Embedded-atom-method functions for the fcc metals Cu, Ag, Au, Ni, Pd, Pt, and their alloys. , 1986, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[10]  Chengkuo Lee,et al.  NEMS diaphragm sensors integrated with triple-nano-ring resonator , 2011 .

[11]  P. Yang.  Nanowire Photonics , 2007, 2007 International Nano-Optoelectronics Workshop.

[12]  H. Craighead,et al.  Macroscopic tuning of nanomechanics: substrate bending for reversible control of frequency and quality factor of nanostring resonators. , 2007, Nano letters.

[13]  Xi-Qiao Feng,et al.  Effects of surface elasticity and residual surface tension on the natural frequency of microbeams , 2007 .

[14]  Harold S. Park,et al.  The Influence of shearing and rotary inertia on the resonant properties of gold nanowires , 2010 .

[15]  M. Roukes.  Nanoelectromechanical systems face the future , 2001 .

[16]  Robert C. Cammarata,et al.  SURFACE AND INTERFACE STRESS EFFECTS IN THIN FILMS , 1994 .

[17]  B. E. Alaca,et al.  Thermo-coupled Surface Cauchy-Born Theory: An Engineering Finite Element Approach to Modeling of Nanowire Thermomechanical Response , 2016 .

[18]  J. Reddy,et al.  A higher order beam finite element for bending and vibration problems , 1988 .

[19]  Jianbin Xu,et al.  Surface effects on elastic properties of silver nanowires: Contact atomic-force microscopy , 2006 .

[20]  Dae Sung Yoon,et al.  Nanomechanical resonators and their applications in biological/chemical detection: Nanomechanics pri , 2011 .

[21]  Harold S. Park,et al.  On the importance of surface elastic contributions to the flexural rigidity of nanowires , 2012 .

[22]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  A simple and efficient finite element for plate bending , 1977 .

[23]  G. Cowper.  The Shear Coefficient in Timoshenko’s Beam Theory , 1966 .

[24]  B. E. Alaca,et al.  Monolithic Fabrication of Silicon Nanowires Bridging Thick Silicon Structures , 2015, IEEE Nanotechnology Express.

[25]  J. Chaste,et al.  A nanomechanical mass sensor with yoctogram resolution. , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[26]  M. Ortiz,et al.  Quasicontinuum analysis of defects in solids , 1996 .

[27]  Harold S. Park.  Surface stress effects on the resonant properties of silicon nanowires , 2008 .

[28]  W. Cai,et al.  Size and temperature effects on the fracture mechanisms of silicon nanowires: Molecular dynamics simulations , 2010 .

[29]  L. Katehi,et al.  A 3.4 – 6.2 GHz Continuously tunable electrostatic MEMS resonator with quality factor of 460–530 , 2009, 2009 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest.

[30]  T. Kaneko.  On Timoshenko's correction for shear in vibrating beams , 1975 .

[31]  Michael L. Roukes,et al.  Tuning nonlinearity, dynamic range, and frequency of nanomechanical resonators , 2006 .

[32]  Y. S. Zhang,et al.  Size dependence of Young's modulus in ZnO nanowires. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[33]  M. Roukes,et al.  Toward single-molecule nanomechanical mass spectrometry , 2005, Nature nanotechnology.

[34]  M. Roukes.  Nanoelectromechanical Systems , 2000, cond-mat/0008187.

[35]  Jin He,et al.  Surface stress effect on bending resonance of nanowires with different boundary conditions , 2008 .

[36]  Chien Ming Wang,et al.  Timoshenko beam model for vibration analysis of multi-walled carbon nanotubes , 2006 .

[37]  Mu Chiao,et al.  Post-packaging frequency tuning of microresonators by pulsed laser deposition , 2004 .

[38]  James Hone,et al.  Electrothermal tuning of Al–SiC nanomechanical resonators , 2006 .

[39]  Paulo S. Branicio,et al.  Large deformation and amorphization of Ni nanowires under uniaxial strain: A molecular dynamics study , 2000 .

[40]  Mark A. Reed,et al.  Label-free immunodetection with CMOS-compatible semiconducting nanowires , 2007, Nature.

[41]  P. Yang,et al.  Giant piezoresistance effect in silicon nanowires , 2006, Nature nanotechnology.

[42]  Tarun Kant,et al.  A finite element model for a higher-order shear-deformable beam theory , 1988 .

[43]  Bernard Nysten,et al.  Surface tension effect on the mechanical properties of nanomaterials measured by atomic force microscopy , 2004 .

[44]  Xiaodong Li,et al.  Size dependency of the elastic modulus of ZnO nanowires: Surface stress effect , 2007 .