Technical note: TROG 15.01 SPARK trial multi‐institutional imaging dose measurement

Abstract Purpose The Trans‐Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) 15.01 Stereotactic Prostate Adaptive Radiotherapy utilizing Kilovoltage intrafraction monitoring (SPARK) trial is a multicenter trial using Kilovoltage Intrafraction Monitoring (KIM) to monitor prostate position during the delivery of prostate radiation therapy. KIM increases the accuracy of prostate radiation therapy treatments and allows for hypofractionation. However, an additional imaging dose is delivered to the patient. A standardized procedure to determine the imaging dose per frame delivered using KIM was developed and applied at four radiation therapy centers on three different types of linear accelerator. Methods Dose per frame for kilovoltage imaging in fluoroscopy mode was measured in air at isocenter using an ion chamber. Beam quality and dose were determined for a Varian Clinac iX linear accelerator, a Varian Trilogy, four Varian Truebeams and one Elekta Synergy at four different radiation therapy centers. The imaging parameters used on the Varian machines were 125 kV, 80 mA, and 13 ms. The Elekta machine was measured at 120 kV, 80 mA, and 12 ms. Absorbed doses to the skin and the prostate for a typical SBRT prostate treatment length were estimated according to the IPEMB protocol. Results The average dose per kV frame to the skin was 0.24 ± 0.03 mGy. The average estimated absorbed dose to the prostate for all five treatment fractions across all machines measured was 39.9 ± 2.6 mGy for 1 Hz imaging, 199.7 ± 13.2 mGy for 5 Hz imaging and 439.3 ± 29.0 mGy for 11 Hz imaging. Conclusions All machines measured agreed to within 20%. Additional dose to the prostate from using KIM is at most 1.3% of the prescribed dose of 36.25 Gy in five fractions delivered during the trial.

[1]  Dan Schifter,et al.  Tracking accuracy of a real-time fiducial tracking system for patient positioning and monitoring in radiation therapy. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Paul J Keall,et al.  Real-time prostate trajectory estimation with a single imager in arc radiotherapy: a simulation study , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  G. Ding,et al.  Skin dose differences between intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy and between boost and integrated treatment regimens for treating head and neck and other cancer sites in patients. , 2016, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[4]  Zdenka Kuncic,et al.  Kilovoltage intrafraction monitoring for prostate intensity modulated arc therapy: first clinical results. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Use of the BrainLAB ExacTrac X-Ray 6D system in image-guided radiotherapy. , 2008, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[6]  M. Santoro,et al.  Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy as Boost for Organ-confined Prostate Cancer , 2010, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[7]  A. Nahum,et al.  The IPEMB code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for x-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al-4 mm Cu HVL; 10-300 kV generating potential). Institution of Physics and Engineering in Medicine and Biology. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Dimitre Hristov,et al.  Telerobotic system concept for real-time soft-tissue imaging during radiotherapy beam delivery. , 2010, Medical physics.

[9]  P. Keall,et al.  The first clinical treatment with kilovoltage intrafraction monitoring (KIM): a real-time image guidance method. , 2014, Medical physics.

[10]  P J Keall,et al.  DMLC tracking and gating can improve dose coverage for prostate VMAT. , 2014, Medical physics.

[11]  Anatoly Dritschilo,et al.  A Pilot Study of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy with Hypofractionated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) Boost in the Treatment of Intermediate- to High-Risk Prostate Cancer , 2010, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[12]  Per Rugaard Poulsen,et al.  Improved quality of intrafraction kilovoltage images by triggered readout of unexposed frames. , 2015, Medical physics.

[13]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  The management of imaging dose during image-guided radiotherapy: report of the AAPM Task Group 75. , 2007, Medical physics.

[14]  Shuichi Ozawa,et al.  A dose comparison study between XVI and OBI CBCT systems. , 2008, Medical physics.

[15]  Timothy Solberg,et al.  Multi-institutional clinical experience with the Calypso System in localization and continuous, real-time monitoring of the prostate gland during external radiotherapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  P. Keall,et al.  Estimation of effective imaging dose for kilovoltage intratreatment monitoring of the prostate position during cancer radiotherapy , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Ross I Berbeco,et al.  Clinical feasibility of using an EPID in CINE mode for image-guided verification of stereotactic body radiotherapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  P. Keall,et al.  Measurement of patient imaging dose for real-time kilovoltage x-ray intrafraction tumour position monitoring in prostate patients , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Jonathan G. Li,et al.  An organ and effective dose study of XVI and OBI cone‐beam CT systems , 2010, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[20]  Paul J Keall,et al.  A method to estimate mean position, motion magnitude, motion correlation, and trajectory of a tumor from cone-beam CT projections for image-guided radiotherapy. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  I. Hsu,et al.  Stereotactic body radiotherapy as monotherapy or post-external beam radiotherapy boost for prostate cancer: technique, early toxicity, and PSA response. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.