Queuing network models for panel sizing in oncology

Motivated by practices and issues at the British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA), we develop queuing network models to determine the appropriate number of patients to be managed by a single physician. This is often referred to as a physician’s panel size. The key features that distinguish our study of oncology practices from other panel size models are high patient turnover rates, multiple patient and appointment types, and follow-up care. The paper develops stationary and non-stationary queuing network models corresponding to stabilized and developing practices, respectively. These models are used to determine new patient arrival rates that ensure practices operate within certain performance thresholds. Data from the BCCA are used to calibrate and illustrate the implications of these models.

[1]  Ward Whitt,et al.  Networks of infinite-server queues with nonstationary Poisson input , 1993, Queueing Syst. Theory Appl..

[2]  R. Hall,et al.  Patient flow : reducing delay in healthcare delivery , 2006 .

[3]  Martin L. Puterman,et al.  Capacity planning and appointment scheduling for new patient oncology consults , 2016, Health care management science.

[4]  L. Green,et al.  Providing timely access to care: what is the right patient panel size? , 2007, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[5]  James Stahl,et al.  Improving Clinical Access and Continuity through Physician Panel Redesign , 2010, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[6]  M. Murray,et al.  Panel size: how many patients can one doctor manage? , 2007, Family practice management.

[7]  Hari Balasubramanian,et al.  The impact of case mix on timely access to appointments in a primary care group practice , 2012, Health Care Management Science.

[8]  D. Tulsky,et al.  The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  G. Bitran,et al.  Queueing Networks : Optimization and Performance Evaluation Models for Discrete Manufacturing Systems by , 1996 .

[10]  R. Hall Patient flow : reducing delay in healthcare delivery , 2006 .

[11]  Leon F. McGinnis,et al.  Performance evaluation for general queueing networks in manufacturing systems: Characterizing the trade-off between queue time and utilization , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  R. Bekker,et al.  Care on demand in nursing homes: a queueing theoretic approach , 2016, Health care management science.

[13]  Hirotaka Sakasegawa,et al.  An approximation formulaLq ≃α·ρβ/(1-ρ) , 1977 .

[14]  D Prieto,et al.  An operational epidemiological model for calibrating agent-based simulations of pandemic influenza outbreaks , 2016, Health care management science.

[15]  Richard J. Boucherie,et al.  Transient product from distributions in queueing networks , 1993, Discret. Event Dyn. Syst..

[16]  Toshikazu Kimura,et al.  Approximations for multi-server queues: System interpolations , 1994, Queueing Syst. Theory Appl..

[17]  Ward Whitt,et al.  APPROXIMATIONS FOR THE GI/G/m QUEUE , 1993 .

[18]  D. Berwick,et al.  Advanced access: reducing waiting and delays in primary care. , 2003, JAMA.

[19]  L. Green,et al.  Reducing Delays for Medical Appointments: A Queueing Approach , 2008, Oper. Res..