Capital Investments and Stock Returns

Abstract Firms that substantially increase capital investments subsequently achieve negative benchmark-adjusted returns. The negative abnormal capital investment/return relation is shown to be stronger for firms that have greater investment discretion, i.e., firms with higher cash flows and lower debt ratios, and is shown to be significant only in time periods when hostile takeovers were less prevalent. These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that investors tend to underreact to the empire building implications of increased investment expenditures. Although firms that increase capital investments tend to have high past returns and often issue equity, the negative abnormal capital investment/return relation is independent of the previously documented long-term return reversal and secondary equity issue anomalies.

[1]  Yuhang Xing,et al.  An Investment-Growth Asset Pricing Model , 2001 .

[2]  S. Myers,et al.  Stock Issues and Investment Policy When Firms Have Information that Investors Do Not Have , 1982 .

[3]  John Mcconnell,et al.  Corporate capital expenditure decisions and the market value of the firm , 1985 .

[4]  Jun Cai,et al.  The investment and operating performance of Japanese initial public offerings , 1997 .

[5]  Stephen C. Vogt.  Cash Flow and Capital Spending: Evidence from Capital Expenditure Announcements , 1997 .

[6]  T. Wong,et al.  Why Do New Issues and High-Accrual Firms Underperform: The Role of Analysts' Credulity , 2001 .

[7]  Jay R. Ritter,et al.  Measuring abnormal performance: Do stocks overreact? , 1992 .

[8]  Owen A. Lamont.  Investment Plans and Stock Returns , 1999 .

[9]  Profitability of Momentum Strategies: An Evaluation of Alternative Explanations , 1999 .

[10]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers , 1999 .

[11]  Theo Vermaelen,et al.  Market Underreaction to Open Market Share Repurchases , 1994 .

[12]  Kent D. Daniel,et al.  Explaining the Cross-Section of Stock Returns in Japan: Factors or Characteristics? , 2001 .

[13]  Tim Loughran,et al.  The New Issues Puzzle , 1995 .

[14]  E. Fama,et al.  Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds , 1993 .

[15]  Kent D. Daniel,et al.  Measuring mutual fund performance with characteristic-based benchmarks , 1997 .

[16]  W. Breen,et al.  Sample‐Dependent Results Using Accounting and Market Data: Some Evidence , 1986 .

[17]  L. Blose,et al.  Tobin's q-Ratio and Market Reaction to Capital Investment Announcements , 1997 .

[18]  Tim Loughran,et al.  The Operating Performance of Firms Conducting Seasoned Equity Offerings , 1997 .

[19]  Steven M. Fazzari,et al.  Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment , 1987 .

[20]  A. Shleifer,et al.  The Stock Market Investments: Is the Market a Sideshow? , 1990 .

[21]  Andrei Shleifer,et al.  Good News for Value Stocks: Further Evidence on Market Efficiency , 1995 .

[22]  Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment , 1988 .

[23]  Sheridan Titman,et al.  On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance , 1997 .

[24]  E. Fama,et al.  Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[25]  R. Thaler,et al.  Does the Stock Market Overreact , 1985 .

[26]  Kent D. Daniel,et al.  NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES EVIDENCE ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF CROSS SECTIONAL VARIATION IN STOCK RETURNS , 1996 .

[27]  R. Hubbard,et al.  Capital-Market Imperfections and Investment , 1997 .

[28]  Narasimhan Jegadeesh,et al.  Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency , 1993 .

[29]  Jeffrey Wurgler,et al.  When Does the Market Matter? Stock Prices and the Investment of Equity-Dependent Firms , 2001 .