Why some groups just feel better: the regulatory fit of group power.

The current research applied the regulatory fit hypothesis (E. T. Higgins, 2000) to the evaluation of groups, suggesting that individuals' group appraisal depends on how well the groups fit their regulatory needs. Specifically, it was predicted that higher power groups would fit and be more valued by those individuals with a promotion focus because these groups provide a better opportunity to sustain nurturance and achievement needs. Alternatively, lower power groups were predicted to fit and be more valued by those individuals with a prevention focus because these groups necessitate (and thus sustain) a focus on safety and security. Five studies found support for these predictions by both assessing and manipulating regulatory focus and group power and by using explicit and implicit measures of group attraction. Moreover, these regulatory fit effects occurred specifically for group power and not for general differences in group status.

[1]  N. Liberman,et al.  Imagining How You’d Feel: The Role of Motivational Experiences from Regulatory Fit , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[2]  K. Sassenberg,et al.  Don't ignore the other half: The impact of ingroup identification on implicit measures of prejudice , 2005 .

[3]  Moral value transfer from regulatory fit: what feels right is right and what feels wrong is wrong. , 2003 .

[4]  J. Crocker,et al.  Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. , 1989 .

[5]  E. Higgins,et al.  Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations : Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making , 1997 .

[6]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[7]  Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: evidence that more powerful groups are more variable. , 2002 .

[8]  Jolanda Jetten,et al.  Defining dimensions of distinctiveness: Group variability makes a difference to differentiation , 1998 .

[9]  Geoffrey J. Leonardelli,et al.  Minority and Majority Discrimination: When and Why ☆ , 2001 .

[10]  Kenneth A. Graetz,et al.  In search of self-definition: motivational primacy of the individual self, motivational primacy of the collective self, or contextual primacy? , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  R. Fazio,et al.  Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: a bona fide pipeline? , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Nina Hansen,et al.  The carry-over effect of competition: The impact of competition on prejudice towards uninvolved outgroups , 2007 .

[13]  N. Liberman,et al.  Regulatory fit and resisting temptation during goal pursuit. , 2002 .

[14]  N. Branscombe,et al.  The Meaning and Consequences of Perceived Discrimination in Disadvantaged and Privileged Social Groups , 2002 .

[15]  Andreas Klink,et al.  Responding to negative social identity: a taxonomy of identity management strategies , 1998 .

[16]  Bilian Ni Sullivan,et al.  Social Inequality and the Reduction of Ideological Dissonance on Behalf of the System: Evidence of Enhanced System Justification among the Disadvantaged , 2001 .

[17]  E. Higgins,et al.  Performance incentives and means: how regulatory focus influences goal attainment. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  R. Cordero,et al.  Favoritism, Bias, and Error in Performance Ratings of Scientists and Engineers: The Effects of Power, Status, and Numbers , 2001 .

[19]  Dominic Abrams,et al.  Towards a single-process uncertainty-reduction model of social motivation in groups. , 1993 .

[20]  E. Higgins,et al.  Regulatory fit and persuasion: transfer from "Feeling Right.". , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Marianne Schmid Mast,et al.  Anybody can be a boss but only certain people make good subordinates: behavioral impacts of striving for dominance and dominance aversion. , 2003, Journal of personality.

[22]  Itesh Sachdev,et al.  Social categorization and power differentials in group relations , 1985 .

[23]  M. Hogg,et al.  Relations Between High and Low Power Groups: The Importance of Legitimacy , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[24]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Jens Förster,et al.  Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment : Regulatory focus and the goal looms larger effect , 1998 .

[26]  E. Higgins Making a good decision: value from fit. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[27]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[28]  Michael H. Kutner Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[29]  E. Higgins,et al.  Principles of Judging Valence: What Makes Events Positive or Negative? , 1996 .

[30]  E. Higgins,et al.  Emotional responses to goal attainment: strength of regulatory focus as moderator. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  R. Friedman,et al.  The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  A. Bizman,et al.  Group-Based Emotional Distress: An Extension of Self-Discrepancy Theory , 2001 .

[33]  E. Higgins The aboutness principle : A pervasive influence on human inference , 1998 .

[34]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Blackwell handbook of social psychology: intergroup processes , 2002 .

[35]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Implicit and Explicit Prejudice and Interracial Interaction , 2002 .

[36]  K. Sassenberg,et al.  Less negative=more positive? Social discrimination as avoidance or approach , 2003 .

[37]  Diane M. Mackie,et al.  Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception. , 1993 .

[38]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. , 2001, Psychological methods.

[39]  Eliot R. Smith Social Identity and Social Emotions: Toward New Conceptualizations of Prejudice , 1993 .

[40]  R. Bourhis,et al.  Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations , 1991 .

[41]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  When the pressure is up: The assessment of social identity threat in low and high status groups , 2005 .

[42]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Personal Need for Structure: Individual Differences in the Desire for Simple Structure , 1993 .

[43]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Intergroup emotions: explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  T. Kessler,et al.  Strategies to cope with negative social identity: predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Membership has its (epistemic) rewards: need for closure effects on in-group bias. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  Joseph P. Forgas,et al.  The Social Self : Cognitive, Interpersonal and Intergroup Perspectives , 2002 .

[48]  J. Richeson,et al.  Regulatory focus and executive function after interracial interactions , 2006 .

[49]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  Power, Approach, and Inhibition , 2003 .

[50]  Gün R Semin,et al.  Linguistic signatures of regulatory focus: how abstraction fits promotion more than prevention. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  E. Higgins,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article ENJOYING GOAL-DIRECTED ACTION: The Role of Regulatory Fit , 2022 .

[52]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[53]  Pleasure and Pain , 1968 .

[54]  M. Brewer The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate? , 1999 .

[55]  K. Sassenberg,et al.  The impact of regulatory focus on affective responses to social discrimination , 2007 .

[56]  C. Judd,et al.  Evaluative versus Conceptual Judgments in Automatic Stereotyping and Prejudice , 2001 .

[57]  E. Higgins Beyond pleasure and pain. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[58]  E. Higgins,et al.  Transfer of value from fit. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[59]  S. Costarelli Affective responses to own violations of ingroup norms: the moderating role of norm salience , 2005 .

[60]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  An In-Group Becomes Part of the Self: Response Time Evidence , 1996 .

[61]  M. Brewer The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time , 1991 .

[62]  S. Worchel,et al.  The Social psychology of intergroup relations , 1979 .

[63]  E. Higgins,et al.  Promoting Us or Preventing Them: Regulatory Focus and Manifestations of Intergroup Bias , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[64]  M. Cadinu,et al.  Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[65]  M. Hogg Subjective Uncertainty Reduction through Self-categorization: A Motivational Theory of Social Identity Processes , 2000 .

[66]  S. Spencer,et al.  Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others , 1997 .

[67]  A. McConnell,et al.  Relations among the Implicit Association Test, Discriminatory Behavior, and Explicit Measures of Racial Attitudes , 2001 .

[68]  Gregg B. Jackson,et al.  Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies , 1982 .