Quantifying the Causal Effect of Speed Cameras on Road Traffic Accidents via an Approximate Bayesian Doubly Robust Estimator

This paper quantifies the effect of speed cameras on road traffic collisions using an approximate Bayesian doubly-robust (DR) causal inference estimation method. Previous empirical work on this topic, which shows a diverse range of estimated effects, is based largely on outcome regression (OR) models using the Empirical Bayes approach or on simple before and after comparisons. Issues of causality and confounding have received little formal attention. A causal DR approach combines propensity score (PS) and OR models to give an average treatment effect (ATE) estimator that is consistent and asymptotically normal under correct specification of either of the two component models. We develop this approach within a novel approximate Bayesian framework to derive posterior predictive distributions for the ATE of speed cameras on road traffic collisions. Our results for England indicate significant reductions in the number of collisions at speed cameras sites (mean ATE = -15%). Our proposed method offers a promising approach for evaluation of transport safety interventions.

[1]  James M. Robins,et al.  On Profile Likelihood: Comment , 2000 .

[2]  D. Basu Randomization Analysis of Experimental Data: The Fisher Randomization Test , 1980 .

[3]  D. Horvitz,et al.  A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement from a Finite Universe , 1952 .

[4]  Geert Wets,et al.  An evaluation of the traffic safety effect of fixed speed cameras , 2014 .

[5]  J. Robins,et al.  Doubly Robust Estimation in Missing Data and Causal Inference Models , 2005, Biometrics.

[6]  Peter J. Bickel,et al.  INFERENCE FOR SEMIPARAMETRIC MODELS: SOME QUESTIONS AND AN ANSWER , 2001 .

[7]  Alena Høye Safety effects of fixed speed cameras - An empirical Bayes evaluation. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  D. Rubin Comment: Which Ifs Have Causal Answers , 1986 .

[9]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  Estimating Safety by the Empirical Bayes Method: A Tutorial , 2002 .

[10]  W J Frith,et al.  The relative effectiveness of a hidden versus a visible speed camera programme. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  M J Maher,et al.  Are speed enforcement cameras more effective than other speed management measures? The impact of speed management schemes on 30 mph roads. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Stephane Hess,et al.  Effects of Speed Limit Enforcement Cameras on Accident Rates , 2003 .

[13]  Bg Heydecker,et al.  The national safety camera programme: three-year evaluation report , 2004 .

[14]  Daniel F. McCaffrey,et al.  Comment: Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data , 2008, 0804.2962.

[15]  Arnab Majumdar,et al.  The impacts of speed cameras on road accidents: an application of propensity score matching methods. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Mike Maher A note on the modelling of TfL fixed speed camera data , 2015 .

[17]  Joseph Kang,et al.  Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data , 2007, 0804.2958.

[18]  James M. Robins,et al.  Unified Methods for Censored Longitudinal Data and Causality , 2003 .

[19]  M. Davidian,et al.  Improving efficiency and robustness of the doubly robust estimator for a population mean with incomplete data , 2009, Biometrika.

[20]  Tajbar Gul,et al.  Transport Statistics Great Britain: 2006 Edition , 2006 .

[21]  Andrew Jones,et al.  The effects of mobile speed camera introduction on road traffic crashes and casualties in a rural county of England. , 2008, Journal of safety research.

[22]  D. Stephens,et al.  Approximate Bayesian Inference for Doubly Robust Estimation , 2016 .

[23]  Charles Goldenbeld,et al.  The effects of speed enforcement with mobile radar on speed and accidents. An evaluation study on rural roads in the Dutch province Friesland. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Jared K Lunceford,et al.  Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study. , 2017, Statistics in medicine.

[25]  A. Tsiatis Semiparametric Theory and Missing Data , 2006 .

[26]  Greg Chen,et al.  Speed and safety effect of photo radar enforcement on a highway corridor in British Columbia. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  Joseph E. Hummer,et al.  Analysis of Automated Speed Enforcement Cameras in Charlotte, North Carolina , 2008 .

[28]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[29]  S M Christie,et al.  Are mobile speed cameras effective? A controlled before and after study , 2003, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[30]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Effects on Accidents of Automatic Speed Enforcement in Norway , 1997 .

[31]  M. Newton Approximate Bayesian-inference With the Weighted Likelihood Bootstrap , 1994 .

[32]  Piercesare Secchi,et al.  Bayesian nonparametric predictive inference and bootstrap techniques , 1996 .

[33]  Laurent Carnis,et al.  An assessment of the safety effects of the French speed camera program. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[34]  D. Rubin The Bayesian Bootstrap , 1981 .

[35]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization , 1978 .

[36]  Kangwon Shin,et al.  Evaluation of the Scottsdale Loop 101 automated speed enforcement demonstration program. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[37]  Linda Mountain Costing lives or saving lives? A detailed evaluation of the impact of speed cameras on safety. , 2004 .