Surface area overestimation within three-dimensional digital images and its consequence for skeletal dosimetry.

The most recent methods for trabecular bone dosimetry are based on Monte Carlo transport simulations within three-dimensional (3D) images of real human bone samples. Nuclear magnetic resonance and micro-computed tomography have been commonly used as imaging tools for studying trabecular microstructure. In order to evaluate the accuracy of these techniques for radiation dosimetry, a previous study was conducted that showed an overestimate in the absorbed fraction of energy for low-energy electrons emitted within the marrow space and irradiating the bone trabeculae. This problem was found to be related to an overestimate of the surface area of the true bone-marrow interface within the 3D digital images, and was identified as the surface-area effect. The goal of the present study is to better understand how this surface-area effect occurs in the case of single spheres representing individual marrow cavities within trabecular bone. First, a theoretical study was conducted which showed that voxelization of the spherical marrow cavity results in a 50% overestimation of the spherical surface area. Moreover, this overestimation cannot be reduced through a reduction in the voxel size (e.g., improved image resolution). Second, a series of single-sphere marrow cavity models was created with electron sources simulated within the sphere (marrow source) and outside the sphere (bone trabeculae source). The series of single-sphere models was then voxelized to represent 3D digital images of varying resolution. Transport calculations were made for both marrow and bone electron sources within these simulated images. The study showed that for low-energy electrons (<100 keV), the 50% overestimate of the bone-marrow interface surface area can lead to a 50% overestimate of the cross-absorbed fraction. It is concluded that while improved resolution will not reduce the surface area effects found within 3D image-based transport models, a tenfold improvement in current image resolution would compensate the associated errors in cross-region absorbed fractions for low-energy electron sources. Alternatively, other methods of defining the bone-marrow interface, such as with a polygonal isosurface, would provide improvements in dosimetry without the need for drastic reductions in image voxel size.

[1]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  In vivo reproducibility of three‐dimensional structural properties of noninvasive bone biopsies using 3D‐pQCT , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[2]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Distal radius: in vivo assessment with quantitative MR imaging, peripheral quantitative CT, and dual X-ray absorptiometry. , 1996, Radiology.

[3]  A. Beddoe,et al.  Calculated dose factors for the radiosensitive tissues in bone irradiated by surface-deposited radionuclides. , 1978, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Ws Snyder,et al.  MIRD Pamphlet #11: S, Absorbed Dose per Unit Cumulated Activity for Selected Radionuclides and Organs , 1975 .

[5]  W. Bolch,et al.  Beta-particle dosimetry of the trabecular skeleton using Monte Carlo transport within 3D digital images. , 2001, Medical physics.

[6]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Sex differences in age-related loss of vertebral trabecular bone mass and structure--biomechanical consequences. , 1989, Bone.

[7]  K F Eckerman,et al.  Electron absorbed fractions and dose conversion factors for marrow and bone by skeletal regions. , 1994, Health physics.

[8]  G Sgouros,et al.  Bone marrow dosimetry for radioimmunotherapy: theoretical considerations. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Correlation of Trabecular Bone Structure with Age, Bone Mineral Density, and Osteoporotic Status: In Vivo Studies in the Distal Radius Using High Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[10]  W. Bolch,et al.  Chord distributions across 3D digital images of a human thoracic vertebra. , 2001, Medical physics.

[11]  S. Goddu,et al.  Considerations in the selection of radiopharmaceuticals for palliation of bone pain from metastatic osseous lesions. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  J. Cameron Review of Radiation Risks and Uranium Toxicity with Application to Decisions Associated with Decommissioning Clean‐up Criteria, by Allen Brodsky , 1996 .

[13]  W E Bolch,et al.  Voxel size effects in three-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy performed for trabecular bone dosimetry. , 2000, Medical physics.

[14]  S. Majumdar,et al.  High Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Calcaneus: Age-Related Changes in Trabecular Structure and Comparison with Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry Measurements , 1997, Calcified Tissue International.

[15]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[16]  A. Beddoe,et al.  Mean skeletal dose factors for beta-particle emitters in human bone. Part I: volume-seeking radionuclides. , 1978, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  Y. Erdi,et al.  Red marrow dosimetry for radiolabeled antibodies that bind to marrow, bone, or blood components. , 2000, Medical physics.

[18]  W. Bolch,et al.  NMR microscopy of trabecular bone and its role in skeletal dosimetry. , 1998, Health physics.

[19]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  High-contrast resolution of CT images for bone structure analysis. , 1992, Medical physics.

[20]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Evaluation of a microcomputed tomography system to study trabecular bone structure , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[21]  X Ouyang,et al.  Texture analysis of direct magnification radiographs of vertebral specimens: correlation with bone mineral density and biomechanical properties. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[22]  M G Stabin,et al.  MIRDOSE: personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  W E Bolch,et al.  S values for radionuclides localized within the skeleton. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[24]  X Ouyang,et al.  A Comparative Study of Trabecular Bone Properties in the Spine and Femur Using High Resolution MRI and CT , 1998, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[25]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Non-invasive bone biopsy: a new method to analyse and display the three-dimensional structure of trabecular bone. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  W E Bolch,et al.  A three-dimensional transport model for determining absorbed fractions of energy for electrons within trabecular bone. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[28]  L. Mosekilde Age-related changes in vertebral trabecular bone architecture--assessed by a new method. , 1988, Bone.

[29]  M. Kleerekoper,et al.  Comparison of radiographic absorptiometry with dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography in normal older white and black women , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[30]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Assessment of trabecular structure using high resolution CT images and texture analysis. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[31]  M. Laval-jeantet,et al.  CT image analysis of the vertebral trabecular network in vivo , 1992, Calcified Tissue International.

[32]  D. Cody,et al.  Correlations Between Vertebral Regional Bone Mineral Density (rBMD) and Whole Bone Fracture Load , 1991, Spine.

[33]  F. Spiers,et al.  Calculated beta-ray dose factors for trabecular bone. , 1976, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  A. Beddoe,et al.  Measurements of trabecular bone structure in man (for radionuclide dosimetry , 1976 .

[35]  W. Bolch,et al.  SKELETAL DOSIMETRY VIA NMR MICROSCOPY: INVESTIGATIONS OF SAMPLE REPRODUCIBILITY AND SIGNAL SOURCE , 2002, Health physics.

[36]  M. Kleerekoper,et al.  Reference data for bone mass, calciotropic hormones, and biochemical markers of bone remodeling in older (55‐75) postmenopausal white and black women , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[37]  D. S. Vickers,et al.  A technique for measuring regional bone mineral density in human lumbar vertebral bodies. , 1989, Medical physics.

[38]  Ronald J. Jaszczak,et al.  Analytical versus voxelized phantom representation for Monte Carlo simulation in radiological imaging , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.