A Critical Review of New Mobility Services for Urban Transport

The growing pressure on urban passenger transport systems has increased the demand for new and innovative solutions to increase its efficiency. One approach to tackle this challenge has been the slow but steady shift towards shared mobility services (car-, bike-sharing etc.). Building on these new modes and the developments in information and communication technologies, the concept of “Mobility as a Service” (MaaS) has recently come to light and offers convenient door-to-door transport without the need to own a private vehicle. The term Mobility as a Service (MaaS) stands for buying mobility services based on consumer needs instead of buying the means of mobility. In recent years, various MaaS schemes have been arisen around the world. The objective of this paper is to review these newly existing mobility services and develop an index to evaluate the level of mobility integration for each based on the assumption that higher level of integration is more appealing to travellers. The review presented in this paper allows a comparison among the schemes and provides the background and the key points of MaaS systems that the research community could use for designing surveys. It also provides significant insights to transport operators and authorities on the elements they should take into account to apply an attractive MaaS scheme that could effectively shift demand away from private vehicles.

[1]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Structures of commitment in mode use: a comparison of Switzerland, Germany and Great Britain , 2001 .

[2]  Wolfgang Schade,et al.  New mobility concepts: myth or emerging reality? , 2014 .

[3]  John Preston,et al.  Integration for Seamless Transport , 2012 .

[4]  Ulrike Stopka,et al.  Identification of User Requirements for Mobile Applications to Support Door-to-Door Mobility in Public Transport , 2014, HCI.

[5]  J. Thøgersen Promoting public transport as a subscription service: Effects of a free month travel card , 2009 .

[6]  Antonella Ferrara,et al.  Integrated Mobility: A Research in Progress , 2013 .

[7]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Pre-commitment and usage: season tickets, cars and travel , 2000 .

[8]  Francis Cheung Implementation of Nationwide Public Transport Smart Card in the Netherlands: Cost–Benefit Analysis , 2006 .

[9]  P. Blythe,et al.  ADEPT III: Piloting Combi-cards for Public Transport Ticketing in Finland , 2001 .

[10]  S. Heikkilä Mobility as a Service - A Proposal for Action for the Public Administration, Case Helsinki , 2014 .

[11]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  The Desired Quality of Integrated Multimodal Travel Information in Public Transport: Customer Needs for Time and Effort Savings , 2007 .

[12]  S. Prakasam The evolution of e-payments in public transport : Singapore's experience , 2008 .

[13]  Thomas Schuster,et al.  Collaborative Management of Intermodal Mobility , 2014, PRO-VE.

[14]  New , Integrated Mobility Services , NIM ( Neue , integrierte Mobilitäts-dienstleistungen in der Schweiz ) Project A 3 of the National Research Programme ( NRP ) 41 ’ Transport and Environment , 2005 .

[15]  Daniel A. Badoe,et al.  Impact of Transit-Pass Ownership on Daily Number of Trips Made by Urban Public Transit , 2007 .

[16]  Licia Capra,et al.  How smart is your smartcard?: measuring travel behaviours, perceptions, and incentives , 2011, UbiComp '11.