Trustworthiness of Grounded Theory Methodology Research in Information Systems

Grounded Theory Methodology (GTM) is being used increasingly in the Information Systems (IS) discipline. However, some consumers of IS literature are skeptical of the findings in studies using this method. In this paper, we provide some steps that can be taken by researchers to improve the credibility of their work. This can be accomplished through increased trustworthiness of their research. The quality of quantitative research can be evaluated by examining the internal validity, external validity, reliability; similarly the trustworthiness of GTM studies can be evaluated by examining the credibility, transferability, dependability and confirmability of the study. We provide specific steps that can be taken to accomplish trustworthiness of GTM research and from IS literature; we summarize some of the GTM research that has applied these steps.

[1]  Elazar J. Pedhazur,et al.  Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach , 1994 .

[2]  A. Cooney Rigour and grounded theory. , 2011, Nurse researcher.

[3]  Syed Nasirin,et al.  Grounded theory method in information systems research: its nature, diversity and opportunities , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[4]  G. Rolfe Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: quality and the idea of qualitative research. , 2006, Journal of advanced nursing.

[5]  Cynthia S Jacelon,et al.  Case and grounded theory as qualitative research methods. , 2005, Urologic nursing.

[6]  Marian Carcary,et al.  The Research Audit Trial - Enhancing Trustworthiness in Qualitative Inquiry , 2009 .

[7]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[8]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[9]  B. Mark,et al.  Methodological Issues in Nurse Staffing Research , 2006, Western journal of nursing research.

[10]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[11]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Scott C. Brown,et al.  Exploring Complex Phenomena: Grounded Theory in Student Affairs Research , 2002 .

[13]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Special issue on action research in information systems: making is research relevant to practice--foreword , 2004 .

[14]  Gert-Jan de Vreede,et al.  Exploring the Application and Acceptance of Group Support Systems in Africa , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Glenn A. Bowen Supporting a grounded theory with an audit trail: an illustration , 2009 .

[16]  Cathy Urquhart,et al.  Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[17]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[18]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validating Instruments in MIS Research , 1989, MIS Q..

[19]  C. Urquhart Grounded Theory for Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide , 2012 .

[20]  Susan L. Morrow Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. , 2005 .

[21]  A. F. Salam,et al.  Managerial Interpretations of the Role of Information Systems in Competitive Actions and Firm Performance: A Grounded Theory Investigation , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Liisa von Hellens,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 2007, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..