Managing the exchange of information in product development

In the present paper, we develop a dynamic programming (DP) model of the product development (PD) process. We conceptualize product development as a sequence of decisions: whether to incorporate a piece of information that just arrived (i.e. became available) or wait longer. We utilize this formulation to analyze different situations that depend on the type, and nature of information that is exchanged: stationary versus dynamic information. We derive optimal decision rules to determine whether (and when) to incorporate for each case. An analysis of the model results in several important findings. First, we must not necessarily incorporate all available information that is related to the design activity. Specifically, once the information collection exceeds certain value, the design team should stop collecting further information. Second, only when past design work accumulates to a certain threshold value should the team include the latest information and perform rework. Large uncertainty of the information and large sensitivity of the design activity makes the incorporation of new information less likely. Finally, managerial implications are discussed with several numerical examples.

[1]  Ali A. Yassine,et al.  A decision analytic framework for evaluating concurrent engineering , 1999 .

[2]  J. Beckham New product development. , 1985, Hospital forum.

[3]  T. Fujimoto,et al.  The Effect of “ Front-Loading ” Problem-Solving on Product Development Performance , 2000 .

[4]  V. Krishnan,et al.  Technology Selection and Commitment in New Product Development: The Role of Uncertainty and Design Flexibility , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Mark G. Carlisle,et al.  Information Technology for Engineering and Manufacturing , 2000 .

[6]  Christopher D. McDaniel,et al.  A linear system framework for analyzing the automotive appearance design process , 1996 .

[7]  Ali Yassine,et al.  Complex Concurrent Engineering and the Design Structure Matrix Method , 2003, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[8]  David G. Ullman,et al.  Robust decision-making for engineering design , 2001 .

[9]  Teck-Hua Ho,et al.  New product development: the performance and time-to-market tradeoff , 1996 .

[10]  D. Tony Liu,et al.  A review of web-based product data management systems , 2001 .

[11]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Limits to Concurrency , 1999 .

[12]  Reza H. Ahmadi,et al.  Time-Cost Trade-Offs in Overlapped Product Development , 2000, Oper. Res..

[13]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Performance of Coupled Product Development Activities with a Deadline , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[14]  David E. Bell,et al.  Sequential Testing in Product Development , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  The Second Toyota Paradox: How Delaying Decisions Can Make Better Cars Faster , 1995 .

[16]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  A Model-Based Framework to Overlap Product Development Activities , 1997 .

[17]  Preston G. Smith,et al.  Developing products in half the time , 1995 .

[18]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality , 1992 .

[19]  Alex H. B. Duffy,et al.  Modelling design development performance , 2002 .

[20]  Evan L. Porteus,et al.  Optimal Timing of Reviews in Concurrent Design for Manufacturability , 1995 .

[21]  Erik Jan Hultink,et al.  4 Product development performance: strategy, organization and management in the world auto industry☆ , 1994 .

[22]  B. Zirger,et al.  A Model of New Product Development: An Empirical Test , 1990 .

[23]  Stephen R. Rosenthal Effective Product Design and Development: How to Cut Lead Time and Increase Customer Satisfaction , 1992 .

[24]  Manu Vedapudi Requirements for a product information management (PIM) infrastructure to support partner programs , 2000 .

[25]  Christer Karlsson,et al.  Technological Level and Product Development Cycle Time , 1999 .

[26]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Simplifying Iterations in Cross-Functional Design Decision Making , 1997 .

[27]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing New Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency, and Quality (Революция в разработке продуктов: количественный скачок в скорости, эффективности и качестве) , 1992 .

[28]  K. Clark,et al.  Lead time in automobile product development explaining the Japanese advantage , 1989 .

[29]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Communication and Uncertainty in Concurrent Engineering , 1998 .

[30]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[31]  W. Edward Back,et al.  Probabilistic Monitoring of Project Performance Using SS-Curves , 2000 .