Effectiveness of a Classroom Chemistry Demonstration using the Cognitive Conflict Strategy

In an action research study, 66 students from Year 11 in an Australian school were shown the colour of methyl violet indicator in some hydrochloric acid solutions, and then in an acetic acid solution. The intent was to create a cognitive conflict, resolution of which would lead to an understanding of the concept weak acid. Student learning emanating from the demonstration was evaluated by written answers to the following: ‘Describe the demonstration’, ‘What was the aim of the demonstration?’, ‘Explain the observations’, and ‘What do you think you have learned?’ Some students were also interviewed. Learning outcomes were disappointing, not because of failure to resolve the intended conflict, but because of failure to attend to the key features of the demonstration and failure to realize a conflict. Some interesting cases of unintended, and undesirable, learning occurred. The role of the teacher was a focus of this study, and recommendations to improve the conduct of cognitive conflict demonstrations were implemented in follow‐up years, and improved learning outcomes resulted.

[1]  R. Osborne,et al.  Learning in science : the implications of children's science , 1985 .

[2]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[3]  Amos Dreyfus,et al.  Applying the cognitive conflict strategy for conceptual change - some implications, difficulties, and problems , 1990 .

[4]  What makes lessons different? a comparison of a student's behaviour in two science lessons , 1993 .

[5]  Richard T. White,et al.  Conceptual and conceptional change , 1994 .

[6]  Geoffrey E. Mills.  Action Research: A Guide for the Teacher Researcher , 1999 .

[7]  Leo H. T. West,et al.  Conceptual understanding and science learning: An interpretation of research within a sources‐of‐knowledge framework , 1986 .

[8]  Chris Dawson,et al.  Equilibration, conflict and instruction: A new class‐oriented perspective , 1985 .

[9]  A. Johnstone.  Chemistry Teaching - Science or Alchemy? 1996 Brasted Lecture , 1997 .

[10]  Peter J. Fensham,et al.  Inconsistent or Discrepant Events in Science Instruction , 1988 .

[11]  Kathryn F. Cochran.  The content of science: a constructivist approach to its teaching and learning , 1997 .

[12]  Alex H. Johnstone,et al.  Chemistry Teaching: Science or Alchemy?. , 1997 .

[13]  Han-Joong Koh,et al.  The influence of students’ cognitive and motivational variables in respect of cognitive conflict and conceptual change , 2005 .

[14]  R. Driver,et al.  Students’ conceptions and the learning of science , 1989 .

[15]  Gabriela C. Weaver,et al.  Strategies in K‐12 science instruction to promote conceptual change , 1998 .

[16]  Ian James Mitchell,et al.  Improving the quality of teaching and learning : an Australian case study - the PEEL project , 1993 .

[17]  J. O'Brien.  Action research through stimulated recall , 1993 .

[18]  J. Nussbaum,et al.  Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy , 1982 .

[19]  M. Limón.  On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: a critical appraisal , 2001 .

[20]  Mariana G. Hewson,et al.  The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction , 1984 .

[21]  Edward L. Smith,et al.  Teaching strategies associated with conceptual change learning in Science , 1993 .

[22]  D. Treagust,et al.  Learning in Science — From Behaviourism Towards Social Constructivism and Beyond , 1998 .

[23]  Hugh Munby,et al.  Concept mapping and misconceptions: a study of high-school students' understandings of acids and bases , 1991 .