Sex-based Differences in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes in Patients with Ischaemic Heart Disease

In high-income countries, ischaemic heart disease is the leading cause of death in women and men, accounting for more than 20% of deaths in both sexes. However, women are less likely to receive guideline-recommended percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) than men. Women undergoing PCI have poorer unadjusted outcomes because they are older and have greater comorbidity than men, but uncertainty remains whether sex affects outcome after these differences in clinical characteristics are considered. In this paper, we review recent published evidence comparing outcomes between men and women undergoing PCI. We focus on the sex differences in PCI outcomes in different scenarios: acute coronary syndromes, stable angina and complex lesions, including the approach of left main coronary artery. We also review how gender is considered in recent guidelines and offer a common clinical scenario to illustrate the contemporary management strategies an interventional cardiologist should consider when performing PCI on a female patient.

[1]  G. Dangas,et al.  Sex-Related Outcomes of Medical, Percutaneous, and Surgical Interventions for Coronary Artery Disease: JACC Focus Seminar 3/7. , 2022, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  C. Held,et al.  Comprehensive Quality-of-Life Outcomes With Invasive Versus Conservative Management of Chronic Coronary Disease in ISCHEMIA , 2022, Circulation.

[3]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Review. , 2022, JAMA.

[4]  OUP accepted manuscript , 2022, European Heart Journal.

[5]  Correction to: 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. , 2021, Circulation.

[6]  S. Garg,et al.  Sex-Related Outcomes of Successful Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment in De Novo Coronary Artery Disease , 2021, Yonsei medical journal.

[7]  H. Schunkert,et al.  Twelve-month clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the ISAR-REACT 5 trial. , 2021, European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care.

[8]  D. Clark,et al.  Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes in Men versus Women Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. , 2021, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  Ju Hyeon Kim,et al.  Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes Following Coronary Revascularization in Men-vs-Women with Unprotected Left Main Disease. , 2021, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  E. Hagström,et al.  Prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention , 2021, Heart.

[11]  José Luis Bernal,et al.  Sex bias in admission to tertiary‐care centres for acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock , 2021, European journal of clinical investigation.

[12]  D. Feldman,et al.  Sex-based differences in revascularization and 30-day readmission after ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction in the United States. , 2020, Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions.

[13]  H. Jneid,et al.  Age-Stratified Sex-Related Differences in the Incidence, Management, and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction. , 2020, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[14]  Samin K. Sharma,et al.  A sex paradox in clinical outcomes following complex percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2020, International journal of cardiology.

[15]  M. Valgimigli,et al.  Sex-differences in outcomes after PCI or CABG for left main disease: from the DELTA registries , 2020 .

[16]  José Luis Bernal,et al.  Impact of sex differences and network systems on the in-hospital mortality of patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. , 2020, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[17]  B. Gersh,et al.  Sex and Gender Disparities in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock in Older Adults. , 2020, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[18]  D. van Klaveren,et al.  Sex Differences in All-Cause Mortality in the Decade Following Complex Coronary Revascularization. , 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  R. Guddeti,et al.  Sex differences in clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2020, Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions.

[20]  P. Serruys,et al.  Long-Term Outcomes in Women and Men Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. , 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  H. Thiele,et al.  Sex-Specific Management in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock , 2020, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[22]  Correction to: Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. , 2020, Circulation.

[23]  J. Mehilli,et al.  Coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome in women , 2020, Heart.

[24]  E. Antman,et al.  Outcomes of Women Compared With Men After Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  A. Jaffe,et al.  It Will Take More Than Better Diagnostics to Improve the Care of Women With ACS. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  W. O’Neill,et al.  Sex‐related difference in the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing complex high‐risk percutaneous coronary intervention: Insight from the cVAD registry , 2019, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[27]  R. Dreyer,et al.  Sex-Based Differences in Presentation, Treatment, and Complications Among Older Adults Hospitalized for Acute Myocardial Infarction: The SILVER-AMI Study. , 2019, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[28]  P. Jhund,et al.  Healthcare disparities for women hospitalised with myocardial infarction and angina. , 2019, European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes.

[29]  C. Berry,et al.  Sex differences in procedural and clinical outcomes following rotational atherectomy , 2019, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[30]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Twenty Year Trends and Sex Differences in Young Adults Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction: The ARIC Community Surveillance Study , 2019, Circulation.

[31]  U. Baber Defining PCI complexity in the contemporary DES era: Clarity or confusion? , 2018, International journal of cardiology.

[32]  M. Gulati,et al.  Persistent sex disparities in clinical outcomes with percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from 6.6 million PCI procedures in the United States , 2018, PloS one.

[33]  P. Serruys,et al.  Outcomes After Coronary Stenting or Bypass Surgery for Men and Women With Unprotected Left Main Disease: The EXCEL Trial. , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[34]  R. Mehran,et al.  Acute myocardial infarction in young women: current perspectives , 2018, International journal of women's health.

[35]  Eric E. Smith,et al.  Sustained sex‐based treatment differences in acute coronary syndrome care: Insights from the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines Coronary Artery Disease Registry , 2018, Clinical cardiology.

[36]  I. Thylén,et al.  Gender disparities in first medical contact and delay in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a prospective multicentre Swedish survey study , 2018, BMJ Open.

[37]  M. van der Schaar,et al.  Sex Differences in Outcomes After STEMI: Effect Modification by Treatment Strategy and Age , 2018, JAMA Internal Medicine.

[38]  Seung‐Jung Park,et al.  Sex differences in left main coronary artery stenting: Different characteristics but similar outcomes for women compared with men. , 2018, International journal of cardiology.

[39]  Sarabjeet Singh,et al.  Outcomes in Women and Minorities Compared With White Men 1 Year After Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: Insights and Results From the PLATINUM Diversity and PROMUS Element Plus Post-Approval Study Pooled Analysis , 2017, JAMA cardiology.

[40]  L. Wilkins Sex Differences in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention—Insights From the Coronary Angiography and PCI Registry of the German Society of Cardiology , 2017, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[41]  P. Serruys,et al.  Long-term Safety and Efficacy of New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Women With Acute Myocardial Infarction: From the Women in Innovation and Drug-Eluting Stents (WIN-DES) Collaboration , 2017, JAMA cardiology.

[42]  N. Danchin,et al.  Acute coronary syndrome in women: rising hospitalizations in middle-aged French women, 2004–14 , 2017, European heart journal.

[43]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors in Men Versus Women: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[44]  J. Messenger,et al.  Trends in U.S. Cardiovascular Care: 2016 Report From 4 ACC National Cardiovascular Data Registries. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[45]  W. Qiu,et al.  Gender Differences in Outcomes and Predictors of All-Cause Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Data from United Kingdom and Sweden). , 2017, The American journal of cardiology.

[46]  P. Serruys,et al.  TCT-288 Safety and Efficacy of New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Women Undergoing Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: From the Women in Innovation and Drug-Eluting Stents (WIN-DES) Collaborative Patient-Level Pooled Analysis. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[47]  A. Colombo,et al.  Impact of gender on long-term mortality in patients with unprotected left main disease: The Milan and New-Tokyo (MITO) Registry. , 2016, Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions.

[48]  L. Räber,et al.  Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for the Treatment of Stenoses in Small Coronary Arteries: A Network Meta-Analysis. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[49]  Michael S. Lee,et al.  Gender differences in acute and 30‐day outcomes after orbital atherectomy treatment of de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions , 2016, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[50]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Sex Differences in Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention According to Age , 2016, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[51]  K. Schenck-Gustafsson,et al.  Gender in cardiovascular diseases: impact on clinical manifestations, management, and outcomes. , 2016, European heart journal.

[52]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Temporal Trends and Sex Differences in Revascularization and Outcomes of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Younger Adults in the United States. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[53]  S. Morgan,et al.  Sex Disparities in Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Pharmacologic Treatment Initiation and Adherence: Problem for Young Women , 2015, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[54]  P. Giorgi Rossi,et al.  Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Mortality in Diabetics and Nondiabetic Subjects: A Population-Based Study (Italy) , 2015, International journal of endocrinology.

[55]  T. Sundt,et al.  Surgical Ineligibility and Mortality Among Patients With Unprotected Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2014, Circulation.

[56]  A. Jaffe,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Circulation.

[57]  L. Cheskin,et al.  Sex differences in short-term and long-term all-cause mortality among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous intervention: a meta-analysis. , 2014, JAMA internal medicine.

[58]  J. Spertus,et al.  TCT-192 Procedural Outcomes of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report from NCDR , 2014 .

[59]  D. Kolte,et al.  Trends in Incidence, Management, and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United States , 2014, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[60]  R. Dreyer,et al.  Evaluation of gender differences in Door-to-Balloon time in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. , 2013, Heart, lung & circulation.

[61]  W. Qiu,et al.  Gender comparisons in cardiogenic shock during ST elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2013, The American journal of cardiology.

[62]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial , 2013, The Lancet.

[63]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  Incidence and multivariable correlates of long-term mortality in patients treated with surgical or percutaneous revascularization in the synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) trial. , 2012, European heart journal.

[64]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Age and gender differences in quality of care and outcomes for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. , 2012, The American journal of medicine.

[65]  Ju Han Kim,et al.  Comparison of angiographic and other findings and mortality in non-ST-segment elevation versus ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients undergoing early invasive intervention. , 2010, The American journal of cardiology.

[66]  K. Eagle,et al.  Age and sex differences, and changing trends, in the use of evidence-based therapies in acute coronary syndromes: perspectives from a multinational registry , 2010, Coronary artery disease.

[67]  S. Z. Abildstrøm,et al.  Women with acute coronary syndrome are less invasively examined and subsequently less treated than men. , 2010, European heart journal.

[68]  R. Califf,et al.  Sex differences in mortality following acute coronary syndromes. , 2009, JAMA.

[69]  M. Sabatine,et al.  Early invasive vs conservative treatment strategies in women and men with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. , 2008, JAMA.

[70]  Felix Yang,et al.  The impact of gender on vessel size in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries. , 2006, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[71]  K. Fox,et al.  Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.