The influence of single monkey cortico‐motoneuronal cells at different levels of activity in target muscles.

1. This study assessed the facilitation by cortico‐motoneuronal (CM) cells of hand and forearm muscles at different levels of EMG activity. 2. Twenty‐three CM cells were recorded in six hemispheres of four trained monkeys. CM cells were identified by the presence of post‐spike facilitation (PSF) in spike‐triggered averages (STAs) of their target muscles. Cell and muscle activity was recorded during performance of a low force (0.2‐1.5 N) precision grip task between the index finger and thumb. The hold periods of this task lasted 1‐1.5 s and provided segments of steady EMG activity. 3. The discharge activity of each CM cell, and the amplitude of the PSF produced in one or two target muscles, were compared across two to six different levels of EMG activity during the hold periods. 4. Of the forty‐two CM cell‐muscle combinations tested, twenty (48%) showed a significant increase in CM cell discharge rate with increased target muscle EMG activity (P < 0.001); three (7%) showed significant negative correlation; and no correlation was found for nineteen combinations (45%). 5. From a low to a high level of EMG activity (0.3‐8.65% of the maximum EMG activity recorded), the absolute amount of facilitation produced by each CM cell increased by a factor of 1.2‐32 (median value 3.7). This increase in facilitation occurred irrespective of the presence or absence of correlation between CM cell discharge rate and target muscle activity. 6. For thirty cell‐muscle combinations in which a significant PSF could be measured at more than one level of EMG activity, the relative degree of facilitation remained constant in nine, increased in thirteen and decreased in seven combinations. In some cases saturation effects were evident. For ten combinations PSF was observed at high but not at low levels of EMG activity. 7. The changes in PSF amplitude with level of EMG activity were also present in STAs compiled from only those spikes with long interspike intervals (20‐25 ms or greater). The results suggested that spikes with short interspike intervals did not make a significant contribution to the increase in PSF amplitude observed at the higher levels of EMG activity. 8. The changes in PSF amplitude with target muscle activity are probably explained best by changes at the spinal motoneuronal level, which set the response to the CM input. These changes may also reflect differences in the strength of synaptic connectivity made by a CM cell within the motoneurone pool of the target muscle.

[1]  C. G. Phillips,et al.  The distribution of monosynaptic excitation from the pyramidal tract and from primary spindle afferents to motoneurones of the baboon's hand and forearm , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  L. Stark,et al.  Interactions between voluntary and postural mechanisms of thehuman motor system. , 1970, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  A. McComas,et al.  Potentiation of `late' responses evoked in muscles during effort , 1971, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[4]  G L Gottlieb,et al.  The role of the myotatic reflex in the voluntary control of movements. , 1972, Brain research.

[5]  C. D. MARSDEN,et al.  Servo Action in Human Voluntary Movement , 1972, Nature.

[6]  R. Stein,et al.  Changes in firing rate of human motor units during linearly changing voluntary contractions , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  R B Stein,et al.  The orderly recruitment of human motor units during voluntary isometric contractions , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  R. Porter,et al.  The effect of a preceding stimulus on temporal facilitation at corticomotoneuronal synapses , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  G. C. Joyce,et al.  The forces generated at the human elbow joint in response to imposed sinusoidal movements of the forearm , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  W Z Rymer,et al.  Relative strength of synaptic input from short-latency pathways to motor units of defined type in cat medial gastrocnemius. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  J. Stephens,et al.  The reflex responses of single motor units in human first dorsal interosseous muscle following cutaneous afferent stimulation. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  E. Fetz,et al.  Postspike facilitation of forelimb muscle activity by primate corticomotoneuronal cells. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  J. Stephens,et al.  The reflex responses of single motor units in human hand muscles following muscle afferent stimulation. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  E. Fetz,et al.  Functional classes of primate corticomotoneuronal cells and their relation to active force. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  J. Yokota,et al.  Divergent projection of individual corticospinal axons to motoneurons of multiple muscles in the monkey , 1981, Neuroscience Letters.

[16]  R. Lemon,et al.  Corticospinal neurons with a special role in precision grip , 1983, Brain Research.

[17]  W. Tatton,et al.  Dependence of EMG Responses Evoked by Imposed Wrist Displacements on Pre-existing Activity in the Stretched Muscles , 1984, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[18]  M. Verrier.  Alterations in H reflex magnitude by variations in baseline EMG excitability. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  R. Porter,et al.  Corticomotoneuronal synapses in the monkey: Light microscopic localization upon motoneurons of intrinsic muscles of the hand , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[20]  R. B. Muir.  Small hand muscles in percision grip: a corticospinal prerogative? , 1985 .

[21]  R. Lemon,et al.  Corticospinal facilitation of hand muscles during voluntary movement in the conscious monkey. , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  P. Matthews.  Observations on the automatic compensation of reflex gain on varying the pre‐existing level of motor discharge in man. , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  E. Fetz,et al.  Functional relations between primate motor cortex cells and muscles: fixed and flexible. , 1987, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[24]  K. Mills,et al.  Responses in small hand muscles from magnetic stimulation of the human brain. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  E E Fetz,et al.  Cross‐correlation assessment of synaptic strength of single Ia fibre connections with triceps surae motoneurones in cats. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  R. Lemon,et al.  Cross-correlation reveals facilitation of single motor units in thenar muscles by single corticospinal neurones in the conscious monkey , 1987, Neuroscience Letters.

[27]  H. Wigström,et al.  Maintained changes in motoneuronal excitability by short‐lasting synaptic inputs in the decerebrate cat. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  R. Lemon,et al.  The influence of changes in discharge frequency of corticospinal neurones on hand muscles in the monkey. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  E. Fetz,et al.  Effects of synchrony between primate corticomotoneuronal cells on post-spike facilitation of muscles and motor units , 1989, Neuroscience Letters.

[30]  Daniel Kernell,et al.  Synaptic effects on recruitment gain: a mechanism of importance for the input-output relations of motoneurone pools? , 1990, Brain Research.

[31]  E. Fetz,et al.  Neural mechanisms underlying corticospinal and rubrospinal control of limb movements. , 1991, Progress in brain research.

[32]  D. Kernell,et al.  Organized variability in the neuromuscular system: a survey of task-related adaptations. , 1992, Archives italiennes de biologie.

[33]  R. Lemon,et al.  Contribution of the monkey corticomotoneuronal system to the control of force in precision grip. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.