Exploring solar-terrestrial interactions via multiple imaging observers

How does solar wind energy flow through the Earth’s magnetosphere, how is it converted and distributed? is the question we want to address. We need to understand how geomagnetic storms and substorms start and grow, not just as a matter of scientific curiosity, but to address a clear and pressing practical problem: space weather, which can influence the performance and reliability of our technological systems, in space and on the ground, and can endanger human life and health. Much knowledge has already been acquired over the past decades, particularly by making use of multiple spacecraft measuring conditions in situ, but the infant stage of space weather forecasting demonstrates that we still have a vast amount of learning to do. A novel global approach is now being taken by a number of space imaging missions which are under development and the first tantalising results of their exploration will be available in the next decade. In this White Paper, submitted to ESA in response to the Voyage 2050 Call, we propose the next step in the quest for a complete understanding of how the Sun controls the Earth’s plasma environment: a tomographic imaging approach comprising two spacecraft in highly inclined polar orbits, enabling global imaging of magnetopause and cusps in soft X-rays, of auroral regions in FUV, of plasmasphere and ring current in EUV and ENA (Energetic Neutral Atoms), alongside in situ measurements. Such a mission, encompassing the variety of physical processes determining the conditions of geospace, will be crucial on the way to achieving scientific closure on the question of solar-terrestrial interactions.

[1]  A. R. Fogg,et al.  The Evolution of Long‐Duration Cusp Spot Emission During Lobe Reconnection With Respect to Field‐Aligned Currents , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics.

[2]  S. Wing,et al.  Imaging Plasma Density Structures in the Soft X-Rays Generated by Solar Wind Charge Exchange with Neutrals , 2018, Space Science Reviews.

[3]  P. Cassak,et al.  Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection: General Theory and Collisional Simulations , 2007 .

[4]  Christopher T. Russell,et al.  Initial ISEE magnetometer results - Magnetopause observations , 1978 .

[5]  P. Stauning,et al.  Unified PCN and PCS indices: Method of calculation, physical sense, and dependence on the IMF azimuthal and northward components , 2006 .

[6]  L. Cogger,et al.  Field-aligned currents between conjugate hemispheres , 2000 .

[7]  I. Papamastorakis,et al.  Evidence for magnetic field reconnection at the Earth's magnetopause , 1981 .

[8]  A. Ridley,et al.  A statistical study of BRIs (SMCs), isolated substorms, and individual sawtooth injections , 2009 .

[9]  E. Zesta,et al.  Dayside reconnection enhancement resulting from a solar wind dynamic pressure increase , 2007 .

[10]  V. Angelopoulos,et al.  Structure of plasmaspheric plumes and their participation in magnetopause reconnection: First results from THEMIS , 2008 .

[11]  Wolfgang Baumjohann,et al.  The terrestrial ring current: Origin, formation, and decay , 1999 .

[12]  V. A. Sergeev,et al.  Steady magnetospheric convection: A review of recent results , 1996 .

[13]  Daniel T. Welling,et al.  Real‐Time SWMF at CCMC: Assessing the Dst Output From Continuous Operational Simulations , 2018, Space Weather.

[14]  Stephen E. Milan,et al.  Both solar wind‐magnetosphere coupling and ring current intensity control of the size of the auroral oval , 2009 .

[15]  M. Dunlop,et al.  Cluster at the Magnetospheric Cusps , 2005 .

[16]  H. Koskinen,et al.  Magnetospheric modes and solar wind energy coupling efficiency , 2010 .

[17]  Jesper Gjerloev,et al.  Evaluation of SuperMAG auroral electrojet indices as indicators of substorms and auroral power , 2011 .

[18]  E. Roelof,et al.  Imaging two geomagnetic storms in energetic neutral atoms , 2001 .

[19]  P. Brandt,et al.  Derivation of currents and diamagnetic effects from global plasma pressure distributions obtained by IMAGE/HENA , 2004 .

[20]  Steven K. Morley,et al.  On the triggering of auroral substorms by northward turnings of the interplanetary magnetic field , 2009 .

[21]  S. Cowley The causes of convection in the Earth's magnetosphere: A review of developments during the IMS , 1982 .

[22]  M. Lester,et al.  Multi‐instrument observation of simultaneous polar cap auroras on open and closed magnetic field lines , 2017 .

[23]  J. Richardson,et al.  PLASMA AND MAGNETIC FIELD CHARACTERISTICS OF SOLAR CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS IN RELATION TO GEOMAGNETIC STORM INTENSITY AND VARIABILITY , 2015, 1508.01267.

[24]  D. Mccomas,et al.  Five Years of Stereo Magnetospheric Imaging by TWINS , 2013 .

[25]  Georgios Balasis,et al.  Common solar wind drivers behind magnetic storm–magnetospheric substorm dependency , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[26]  R. Roble,et al.  Electrodynamic effects of thermospheric winds from the NCAR Thermospheric General Circulation Model , 1987 .

[27]  R. S. Turley,et al.  The Extreme Ultraviolet Imager Investigation for the IMAGE Mission , 2000 .

[28]  I. Honkonen,et al.  Assessing the performance of community‐available global MHD models using key system parameters and empirical relationships , 2015 .

[29]  Oswald H. W. Siegmund,et al.  Far ultraviolet imaging from the IMAGE spacecraft. 3. Spectral imaging of Lyman-α and OI 135.6 nm , 2000 .

[30]  E. Kronberg,et al.  IMF dependence of energetic oxygen and hydrogen ion distributions in the near‐Earth magnetosphere , 2017 .

[31]  C. T. Russell,et al.  Initial ISEE magnetometer results: magnetopause observations , 1978 .

[32]  J. Borovsky,et al.  Dominant role of the asymmetric ring current in producing the stormtime , 2001 .

[33]  Peter. Dyson,et al.  A decade of the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN): scientific achievements, new techniques and future directions , 2007 .

[34]  J. Dungey Interplanetary Magnetic Field and the Auroral Zones , 1961 .

[35]  C. Holmlund,et al.  The Two Wide-angle Imaging Neutral-atom Spectrometers (TWINS) NASA Mission-of-Opportunity , 2008 .

[36]  Vassilis Angelopoulos,et al.  The THEMIS Mission , 2008 .

[37]  M. Fujimoto,et al.  What Controls the Structure and Dynamics of Earth’s Magnetosphere? , 2015 .

[38]  P. Newell,et al.  Solar wind driving and substorm triggering , 2011 .

[39]  J. Carter,et al.  Transpolar arcs observed simultaneously in both hemispheres , 2017 .

[40]  R. McPherron,et al.  Average Characteristics of Triggered and Nontriggered Substorms , 2004 .

[41]  K. Laundal,et al.  Asymmetric auroral intensities in the Earth’s Northern and Southern hemispheres , 2009, Nature.

[42]  V. Angelopoulos,et al.  On the storm‐time evolution of relativistic electron phase space density in Earth's outer radiation belt , 2013 .

[43]  M. Hesse,et al.  Effect of multiple substorms on the buildup of the ring current , 2005 .

[44]  Adrian Grocott,et al.  Formation and motion of a transpolar arc in response to dayside and nightside reconnection , 2005 .

[45]  J. Gérard,et al.  Proton aurora in the cusp , 2002 .

[46]  Dennis L. Gallagher,et al.  Extreme Ultraviolet Imager Observations of the Structure and Dynamics of the Plasmasphere , 2003 .

[47]  Robert L. McPherron,et al.  Geomagnetic storms driven by ICME- and CIR-dominated solar wind , 2006 .

[48]  G. Gloeckler,et al.  Ring current development during the great geomagnetic storm of February 1986 , 1988 .

[49]  C. Meng,et al.  Investigation of external triggering of substorms with Polar ultraviolet imager observations , 2003 .

[50]  Hideaki Kawano,et al.  Magnetopause location under extreme solar wind conditions , 1998 .

[51]  S. Akasofu Auroral Substorms: Search for Processes Causing the Expansion Phase in Terms of the Electric Current Approach , 2017 .

[52]  J. Gérard,et al.  Magnetic reconnection during steady magnetospheric convection and other magnetospheric modes , 2017 .

[53]  J. Borovsky,et al.  Differences between CME‐driven storms and CIR‐driven storms , 2006 .

[54]  E. al.,et al.  SMILE Definition Study Report , 2018 .

[55]  Shun Takahashi,et al.  A simulation of the storm-time ring current , 1990 .

[56]  M. Dunlop,et al.  The plasma sheet and boundary layers under northward IMF: A multi-point and multi-instrument perspective , 2008 .

[57]  James L. Burch,et al.  IMAGE mission overview , 2000 .

[58]  W Lotko,et al.  Magnetosphere Sawtooth Oscillations Induced by Ionospheric Outflow , 2011, Science.

[59]  J. Carter,et al.  Comparative study of large‐scale auroral signatures of substorms, steady magnetospheric convection events, and sawtooth events , 2017 .

[60]  G. Siscoe,et al.  MHD properties of magnetosheath flow , 2002 .

[61]  V. Maget,et al.  Characterizing magnetopause shadowing effects in the outer electron radiation belt during geomagnetic storms , 2016 .

[62]  D. Sibeck,et al.  What Happens Before a Southward IMF Turning Reaches the Magnetopause? , 2017 .

[63]  J. Borovsky,et al.  A statistical look at plasmaspheric drainage plumes , 2008 .

[64]  N. G. Popova,et al.  Observational evidence of the loading‐unloading substorm scheme , 2005 .

[65]  I. J. Rae,et al.  Tail Reconnection Triggering Substorm Onset , 2008, Science.

[66]  R. McPherron,et al.  Response of the Earth's magnetosphere to changes in the solar wind , 2008 .

[67]  A. Otto,et al.  Kelvin Helmholtz Instability at the Equatorial Magnetotail Boundary: Mhd Simulation and Comparison with Geotail Observations , 2013 .

[68]  B. Tsurutani,et al.  Solar wind-magnetosphere coupling during intense magnetic storms (1978-1979) , 1989 .

[69]  N. Tsyganenko Data-based modelling of the Earth's dynamic magnetosphere: a review , 2013 .

[70]  R. E. Thompson,et al.  High energy neutral atom (hena) imager for the IMAGE mission , 2000 .

[71]  N. Østgaard,et al.  Observations of non‐conjugate theta aurora , 2003 .

[72]  M. Lester,et al.  Dayside convection and auroral morphology during an interval of northward interplanetary magnetic field , 2000 .

[73]  S. Petrinec,et al.  Location of the reconnection line at the magnetopause during southward IMF conditions , 2007 .

[74]  N. Omidi,et al.  Jets Downstream of Collisionless Shocks , 2018, Space Science Reviews.