Discrete Exclusion Zone for Dynamic Spectrum Access Wireless Networks

The implementation of a geographic exclusion zone (GEZ) has been a scheme in regulations developed to protect a primary user (PU) in dynamic spectrum access wireless networks, where secondary users (SUs) can transmit only outside the exclusion zone region centered at the PU receiver. After determining the radius of the GEZ, the number of operable nodes in actual deployment is quite uncertain due to the random location of nodes. This poses certain difficulty for SU spectrum sharing planning. In this paper, we propose an alternative PU protection scheme called the discrete exclusion zone (DEZ), which is shapeless. The PU protection is achieved by switching off the first <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$k-1$ </tex-math></inline-formula> nearest neighboring SUs surrounding the PU. Building on the stochastic geometry of wireless node locations, the conditions under which the mean and the variance of the aggregate interference from SUs to the PU exist are obtained. These conditions define the minimum size of the DEZ. Then, we obtain the closed-form expressions for the mean and the variance as a function of the DEZ size <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$k$ </tex-math></inline-formula> for a given number of SUs <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$N$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, including <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$N\rightarrow \infty $ </tex-math></inline-formula>. Since it is challenging to obtain a closed-form expression of the density function, we resort to the Gamma distribution to approximate the distribution of the aggregate interference, which is validated by simulations. Finally, the performances of the GEZ and DEZ are investigated in terms of the number of operable SUs outside the GEZ and DEZ, respectively, for achieving a given PU protection requirement. The results show that the DEZ gives a fixed number of operable nodes in the presence of topology randomness associated with the actual SU network deployment.

[1]  Martin Haenggi,et al.  Interference and Outage in Poisson Cognitive Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[2]  Chen Sun,et al.  Reducing Complexity of TVWS Operation: Complying with European Regulations , 2017, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine.

[3]  Hanna Bogucka,et al.  Opportunistic Spectrum Sharing and White Space Access: The Practical Reality , 2015 .

[4]  Hiroshi Harada,et al.  Primary Contour Prediction Based on Detailed Topographic Data and Its Impact on TV White Space Availability , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[5]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  The Guard Zone in Wireless Ad hoc Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[6]  Bing Chen,et al.  Full Spectrum Sharing in Cognitive Radio Networks Toward 5G: A Survey , 2018, IEEE Access.

[7]  Martin Haenggi,et al.  Stochastic Geometry for Modeling, Analysis, and Design of Multi-Tier and Cognitive Cellular Wireless Networks: A Survey , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[8]  Liesbet Van der Perre,et al.  Accumulative Interference Modeling for Cognitive Radios with Distributed Channel Access , 2008, 2008 3rd International Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications (CrownCom 2008).

[9]  Teng Joon Lim,et al.  Interference Management Through Exclusion Zones in Two-Tier Cognitive Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[10]  M. Haenggi,et al.  Interference in Large Wireless Networks , 2009, Found. Trends Netw..

[11]  Abbas Yongacoglu,et al.  On distribution of aggregate interference in cognitive radio networks , 2010, 2010 25th Biennial Symposium on Communications.

[12]  Martin Haenggi,et al.  Distance Distributions in Finite Uniformly Random Networks: Theory and Applications , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[13]  Halim Yanikomeroglu,et al.  Outage Performance of the Primary Service in Spectrum Sharing Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[14]  Klaus David,et al.  6G Vision and Requirements: Is There Any Need for Beyond 5G? , 2018, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine.

[15]  Hiroshi Harada,et al.  Multilevel Protection to Broadcaster Contour and Its Impact on TV White Space Availability , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[16]  Xiaofu Ma,et al.  Practical Issues for Spectrum Management With Cognitive Radios , 2014, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[17]  Sachitha Kusaladharma,et al.  Aggregate Interference Analysis for Underlay Cognitive Radio Networks , 2012, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[18]  Pavan Nuggehalli,et al.  Stochastic Geometry-Based Modeling and Analysis of Citizens Broadband Radio Service System , 2017, IEEE Access.

[19]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Modeling heterogeneous network interference , 2012, 2012 Information Theory and Applications Workshop.

[20]  Martin Haenggi,et al.  On distances in uniformly random networks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[21]  Octavia A. Dobre,et al.  Radio Resource Allocation Techniques for Efficient Spectrum Access in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[22]  Zhou Lan,et al.  Efficiency of dynamic frequency selection based coexistence mechanisms for tv white space enabled cognitive wireless access points , 2012, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[23]  Ayaz Ahmad,et al.  A Survey on Radio Resource Allocation in Cognitive Radio Sensor Networks , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[24]  Pingzhi Fan,et al.  6G Wireless Networks: Vision, Requirements, Architecture, and Key Technologies , 2019, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine.

[25]  Walaa Hamouda,et al.  Resource Allocation for Underlay Cognitive Radio Networks: A Survey , 2017, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.