A Governance Model for Managing Lightweight IT

The widespread introduction of lightweight IT—smartphones, tablets, the Internet of Things, and the growth of third-party app developers—has become a challenge for many organizations. Local units and end-users increasingly are acquiring and implementing lightweight IT outside the realm of the IT function. The trend is driven by competent users’ need for innovative IT services, enabled by the consumerization of digital technologies. Lightweight IT entails exciting business opportunities; however, guidance for managers on how to deal with this development has been very limited. In this paper, we investigate which IT governance models organizations can apply to manage lightweight IT. The managerial challenge is to balance the innovative potential of lightweight IT with the requirements of good governance. Building on the particular challenges of lightweight IT and the extant literature on end-user computing, we present a framework with four alternative governance models. We evaluate the framework through four e-health case studies.

[1]  Walter Brenner,et al.  European Conference on Information Systems ( ECIS ) 5-15-2012 EXPLORING THE SHADOWS : IT GOVERNANCE APPROACHES TO USER-DRIVEN INNOVATION , 2012 .

[2]  Ola Henfridsson,et al.  Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development: the boundary resources model , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[3]  Maryam Alavi,et al.  Strategies for End-User Computing: An Integrative Framework , 1987, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  The IT function and robotic process automation , 2015 .

[5]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Special Issue: Information Technology and Organizational Governance: The IT Governance Cube , 2013, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Ingrid Schirmer,et al.  Bimodal IT: Business-IT alignment in the age of digital transformation , 2016 .

[7]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  The Rise of Platform Ecosystems , 2014 .

[8]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Robotic Process Automation at Telefónica O2 , 2016, MIS Q. Executive.

[9]  R. Bevilacqua,et al.  Advanced technology care innovation for older people in Italy: necessity and opportunity to promote health and wellbeing. , 2014, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[10]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Dynamic structures of control and generativity in digital ecosystem service innovation: the cases of the Apple and Google mobile app stores , 2011 .

[11]  Liviu Iftode,et al.  Balanced traffic routing: Design, implementation, and evaluation , 2016, Ad Hoc Networks.

[12]  Jan Muntermann,et al.  Paradoxes and the Nature of Ambidexterity in IT Transformation Programs , 2015, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  Satwant Kaur The Revolution of Tablet Computers and Apps: A Look At Emerging Trends , 2013, IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine.

[14]  Christoph Lattemann,et al.  Mobile Applications for Knowledge Workers and Field Workers , 2015, Mob. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Bendik Bygstad,et al.  Generative innovation: a comparison of lightweight and heavyweight IT , 2017, J. Inf. Technol..

[16]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks , 2016, Inf. Syst. J..

[17]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy , 2013 .