Development and implementation of key performance indicators for aggregate production using dynamic simulation

Continuous process improvements are needed to maintain and run an industrial operation at a profitable state. An aggregates production plant consists of multiple process operations such as blasting, primary crushing, followed by secondary and tertiary crushing stages with an intermediate screening of products. Each of these processes can be operated with multiple objectives in mind of operators and plant managers. These objectives can be defined by varying terms like generating required throughput of the plant, maintaining equipment’s health, meeting customers’ demands, etc. The use of the term key performance indicators is recurrent in industry to formalise and represent these objectives of operation. Currently, the KPIs defined by the ISO 22400 standards are widespread for continuous improvements in the manufacturing industry and they are viewed as a support tool to measure improvements. The scope of this paper is to calculate relevant KPIs for an aggregates production plant using dynamic simulations. Further, the KPIs are implemented in a three-stage aggregate production plant using both real-time plant data and dynamic process simulation. The KPIs developed are useful for operators and plant managers to make decisions. The results show the relationship and dependencies of various equipment and process KPIs. The dynamic simulation has potential to be used as an exploration tool to identify the opportunities of improvement in aggregates processing using KPIs as a measure. The KPIs presented in the paper are based on ISO 22400 standard and have potential to be extended to similar processing operations such as coarse and fine comminution for minerals processing. Apart from the diagnostics application, the KPIs implemented in the dynamic simulation platform can be used to explore and optimize a crushing plant’s design and operations.

[1]  R. A. Bearman,et al.  Optimum control of cone crushers utilizing an adaptive strategy for wear compensation , 1995 .

[2]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  Key Performance Indicator Elicitation and Selection Through Conceptual Modelling , 2016, ER.

[3]  Massimiliano M. Schiraldi,et al.  Key performance indicators for manufacturing operations management - Gap analysis between process industrial needs and ISO 22400 standard , 2018 .

[4]  David Parmenter,et al.  Key Performance Indicators: Developing, Implementing,and Using Winning KPIs , 2007 .

[5]  Mats Lindqvist Wear in cone crusher chambers , 2005 .

[6]  Gauti Asbjörnsson,et al.  Modelling of Discrete Downtime in Continuous Crushing Operation , 2015 .

[7]  Cong Zhao,et al.  A Hierarchical structure of key performance indicators for operation management and continuous improvement in production systems , 2016, International journal of production research.

[8]  Andy Neely,et al.  Designing performance measures: a structured approach , 1997 .

[9]  Gauti Asbjörnsson,et al.  Optimisation opportunities for HPGR circuits , 2012 .

[10]  Erik Hulthén,et al.  A Cost Effective Conveyor Belt Scale , 2006 .

[11]  Wu He,et al.  Internet of Things in Industries: A Survey , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[12]  Erol Yilmaz Field monitoring and performance evaluation of crushing plant operation , 2014 .

[13]  Andy Neely,et al.  Performance measurement system design , 1995 .

[14]  Carl Magnus Evertsson,et al.  Cone Crusher Performance , 2000 .

[15]  Fiorenzo Franceschini,et al.  Management by Measurement: Designing Key Indicators and Performance Measurement Systems , 2007 .

[16]  Erik Hulthén,et al.  Real-time algorithm for cone crusher control with two variables , 2011 .

[17]  José Ríos,et al.  Evaluation of techniques for manufacturing process analysis , 2006, J. Intell. Manuf..

[18]  A. Smart,et al.  Performance measurement for planning and control in SMEs , 2000, APMS.

[19]  Malcolm Powell,et al.  Human Factors in Control Room Operations in Mineral Processing , 2012 .

[20]  Sai S. Nudurupati,et al.  State of the art literature review on performance measurement , 2011, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[21]  J. Müller,et al.  What Drives the Implementation of Industry 4.0? The Role of Opportunities and Challenges in the Context of Sustainability , 2018 .

[22]  Malcolm Powell,et al.  Transforming the effectiveness of a HPGR circuit at Anglo Platinum Mogalakwena , 2011 .

[23]  Magnus Bengtsson,et al.  An empirical model for predicting flakiness in cone crushing , 2006 .

[24]  K. J. Reid Derivation of an equation for classifier-reduced performance curves , 1971 .

[25]  Gauti Asbjörnsson,et al.  Development of Operator training for the Swedish Aggregates Industry , 2015 .

[26]  B. A. Wills,et al.  Mineral Processing Technology: An Introduction to the Practical Aspects of Ore Treatment and Mineral Recovery , 1988 .

[27]  Gauti Asbjörnsson,et al.  Application of multi-disciplinary optimization architectures in mineral processing simulations , 2018, Minerals Engineering.