Emotions, Demographics and Sociability in Twitter Interactions

The social connections people form online affect the quality of information they receive and their online experience. Although a host of socioeconomic and cognitive factors were implicated in the formation of offline social ties, few of them have been empirically validated, particularly in an online setting. In this study, we analyze a large corpus of geo-referenced messages, or tweets, posted by social media users from a major US metropolitan area. We linked these tweets to US Census data through their locations. This allowed us to measure emotions expressed in the tweets posted from an area, the structure of social connections, and also use that area's socioeconomic characteristics in analysis. %We extracted the structure of online social interactions from the people mentioned in tweets from that area. We find that at an aggregate level, places where social media users engage more deeply with less diverse social contacts are those where they express more negative emotions, like sadness and anger. Demographics also has an impact: these places have residents with lower household income and education levels. Conversely, places where people engage less frequently but with diverse contacts have happier, more positive messages posted from them and also have better educated, younger, more affluent residents. Results suggest that cognitive factors and offline characteristics affect the quality of online interactions. Our work highlights the value of linking social media data to traditional data sources, such as US Census, to drive novel analysis of online behavior.

[1]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The role of social networks in information diffusion , 2012, WWW.

[2]  Sam Duffy A community creating their own rules on foursquare , 2011, 2011 Workshop on Mobile and Online Social Networks.

[3]  Frank Schweitzer,et al.  Political polarization and popularity in online participatory media: an integrated approach , 2012, PLEAD '12.

[4]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  Cultures in Community Question Answering , 2015, HT.

[5]  J. Russell,et al.  Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions , 1977 .

[6]  Reza Zafarani,et al.  Sarcasm Detection on Twitter: A Behavioral Modeling Approach , 2015, WSDM.

[7]  B. Fredrickson The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. , 2001, The American psychologist.

[8]  Navneet Kaur,et al.  Opinion mining and sentiment analysis , 2016, 2016 3rd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom).

[9]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Cognitive social structures , 1987 .

[10]  Catherine T. Shea,et al.  The affective antecedents of cognitive social network activation , 2015, Soc. Networks.

[11]  Lars Backstrom,et al.  Find me if you can: improving geographical prediction with social and spatial proximity , 2010, WWW '10.

[12]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[13]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  Sentiment cascades in the 15M movement , 2015, EPJ Data Science.

[14]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[15]  D. Campbell,et al.  Unobtrusive Measures: Non-Reactive Research in the Social Sciences. , 1966 .

[16]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[17]  F. Schweitzer,et al.  Emotional persistence in online chatting communities , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[18]  Frank Schweitzer,et al.  Emotions in Product Reviews--Empirics and Models , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing.

[19]  Fabrício Benevenuto,et al.  Comparing and combining sentiment analysis methods , 2013, COSN '13.

[20]  Matthew E. Brashears Humans use Compression Heuristics to Improve the Recall of Social Networks , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[21]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  User Effort and Network Structure Mediate Access to Information in Networks , 2015, ICWSM.

[22]  Jasmine Novak,et al.  Geographic routing in social networks , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[23]  Amy Beth Warriner,et al.  Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[24]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. , 1997, Science.

[25]  R. Burt Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  Kyumin Lee,et al.  Exploring Millions of Footprints in Location Sharing Services , 2011, ICWSM.

[27]  J. M. Kittross The measurement of meaning , 1959 .

[28]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  An Empirical Study of Geographic User Activity Patterns in Foursquare , 2011, ICWSM.

[29]  Frank Schweitzer,et al.  Positive words carry less information than negative words , 2011, EPJ Data Science.

[30]  B. Rimé Emotion Elicits the Social Sharing of Emotion: Theory and Empirical Review , 2009 .

[31]  Mark S. Granovetter T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[32]  Henriette Cramer,et al.  Performing a check-in: emerging practices, norms and 'conflicts' in location-sharing using foursquare , 2011, Mobile HCI.

[33]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  The Social World of Twitter: Topics, Geography, and Emotions , 2012, ICWSM.

[34]  D. Campbell,et al.  Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences , 1966 .

[35]  Stanley Milgram,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Small World Problem , 1969 .

[37]  Marshall Van Alstyne,et al.  The Diversity-Bandwidth Tradeoff , 2010 .

[38]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  Tracking "gross community happiness" from tweets , 2012, CSCW.

[39]  N. Eagle,et al.  Network Diversity and Economic Development , 2010, Science.

[40]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[41]  P. Niedenthal,et al.  Social functionality of human emotion. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[42]  Scott A. Golder,et al.  Digital Footprints: Opportunities and Challenges for Online Social Research , 2014 .

[43]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Sentiment strength detection for the social web , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[45]  Arvid Kappas,et al.  Damping Sentiment Analysis in Online Communication: Discussions, Monologs and Dialogs , 2013, CICLing.

[46]  K. Scherer,et al.  The World of Emotions is not Two-Dimensional , 2007, Psychological science.

[47]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Evolution of the Social Brain , 2003, Science.

[48]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Modeling Users' Activity on Twitter Networks: Validation of Dunbar's Number , 2011, PloS one.

[49]  Andreas Kaltenbrunner,et al.  Emotions, Public Opinion and U.S. Presidential Approval Rates: A 5 Year Analysis of Online Political Discussions , 2011 .

[50]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[51]  A-L Barabási,et al.  Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[53]  Berkant Barla Cambazoglu,et al.  A large-scale sentiment analysis for Yahoo! answers , 2012, WSDM '12.

[54]  Marc Barthelemy,et al.  Spatial Networks , 2010, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[55]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  Cultural Dimensions in Twitter: Time, Individualism and Power , 2013, ICWSM.

[56]  Ahmed Abbasi,et al.  Benchmarking Twitter Sentiment Analysis Tools , 2014, LREC.

[57]  Christopher M. Danforth,et al.  The Geography of Happiness: Connecting Twitter Sentiment and Expression, Demographics, and Objective Characteristics of Place , 2013, PloS one.

[58]  Zeynep Tufekci,et al.  Big Questions for Social Media Big Data: Representativeness, Validity and Other Methodological Pitfalls , 2014, ICWSM.