An Experimental Test of Plant Strategy Theory

Two of the central hypotheses of the triangular model of primary plant strategies were tested by a novel technique involving seven grasses of contrasted ecology grown in pure stands and an additive mixture on an experimental matrix of crossed gradients of mineral nutrient stress and vegetation disturbance. The experimental design allowed reductions in vegetative and reproductive vigor resulting from interspecific competition to be distinguished from those arising from direct effects of nutrient stress and vegetation disturbance. It was also possible to determine the extent to which competitive suppression of each species was affected by stress and disturbance. In isolation, all species showed maximum vegetative and reproductive vigor at high soil fertility and low disturbance. In the mixture, absolute reductions in biomass and flowering due to competition were greatest at high soil fertility and low disturbance, and the species of most extreme strategy became restricted to areas of the matrix broadly consistent with those predicted by strategy classification. When standardized for differences in biomass in pure stands, the effect of competition remained relatively constant across the stress-disturbance matrix for all species except Poa annua, which was less restricted by competition at high intensities of stress. There were marked and consistent differences between species in their susceptibility to competition. At both high and low soil fertility, two species of natural occurrence on infertile soils (Festuca ovina, Bromus erectus) were poor competitors relative to Arrhenatherum elatius, a widespread dominant of productive grasslands. The effect of competition was least severe on flowering of annuals in low-stress portions of the matrix. If competition is assessed simply as the percentage of reduction in biomass between pure and mixed stands it appears that competition intensity is constant across different intensities of stress and disturbance. However, observations that maximum reductions in biomass coincided with low stress and low disturbance, that competition decreased in importance as a factor reducing yield and flowering (relative to stress and disturbance) as stress and disturbance intensities increased, and that there was a consistently inferior competitive ability of plants from infertile soils at all positions on the matrix all support the hypothesis that competition declines in importance as a vegetation determinant in the vegetation of infertile soils.

[1]  C. Welden,et al.  Competition and Abiotic Stress Among Trees and Shrubs in Northwest Colorado , 1988 .

[2]  J. P. Grime,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF COMPETITIVE ABILITY IN THREE PERENNIAL GRASSES , 1976 .

[3]  G. Pugh Strategies in fungal ecology , 1980 .

[4]  J. P. Grime,et al.  A comparative study of plant responsiveness to the duration of episodes of mineral nutrient enrichment , 1989 .

[5]  P. Keddy,et al.  Measuring Diffuse Competition Along an Environmental Gradient: Results from a Shoreline Plant Community , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[6]  D. Clarkson PHOSPHORUS SUPPLY AND GROWTH RATE IN SPECIES OF AGROSTIS L. , 1967 .

[7]  E. Newman,et al.  Competition and Diversity in Herbaceous Vegetation , 1973, Nature.

[8]  M. Austin,et al.  USE OF A RELATIVE PHYSIOLOGICAL PERFORMANCE VALUE IN THE PREDICTION OF PERFORMANCE IN MULTISPECIES MIXTURES FROM MONOCULTURE PERFORMANCE , 1982 .

[9]  R. Reader Competition constrained by low nutrient supply: an example involving Hieracium floribundum Wimm & Grab. (Compositae). , 1990 .

[10]  R. H. Groves,et al.  RELATIVE GROWTH OF SIX THISTLE SPECIES ALONG A NUTRIENT GRADIENT WITH MULTISPECIES COMPETITION , 1985 .

[11]  J. P. Grime,et al.  A comparative study of the influence of drought stress on flowering in Urtica dioica and U. urens. , 1986 .

[12]  C. Welden,et al.  The Intensity of Competition Versus its Importance: An Overlooked Distinction and Some Implications , 1986, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[13]  D. Higgs,et al.  Comparative Studies on the Biology of Upland Grasses: I. Rate of Dry Matter Production and its Control in Four Grass Species , 1969 .

[14]  M. Drew,et al.  COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF A LOCALISED SUPPLY OF PHOSPHATE, NITRATE, AMMONIUM AND POTASSIUM ON THE GROWTH OF THE SEMINAL ROOT SYSTEM, AND THE SHOOT, IN BARLEY , 1975 .

[15]  A. Snow,et al.  Plant zonation in an Alaskan salt marsh. II: An experimental study of the role of edaphic conditions , 1984 .

[16]  F. N. David,et al.  Principles and procedures of statistics. , 1961 .

[17]  D. Tilman On the meaning of competition and the mechanisms of competitive superiority , 1987 .

[18]  C. Loehle Problems with the triangular model for representing plant strategies , 1988 .

[19]  R. Reader,et al.  Variation in competition along an environmental gradient: Hieracium floribundum in an abandoned pasture , 1989 .

[20]  S. Pickett,et al.  Organization of an Assemblage of Early Successional Species on a Soil Moisture Gradient , 1978 .

[21]  D. Mueller‐Dombois,et al.  Response of Three Grasses to Two Soils and a Water Table Depth Gradient , 1966 .

[22]  R. Kadmon,et al.  COMPETITION IN A VARIABLE ENVIRONMENT: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY IN A DESERT ANNUAL PLANT POPULATION , 1990 .

[23]  J. P. Grime,et al.  MORPHOLOGICAL PLASTICITY AND MINERAL NUTRIENT CAPTURE IN TWO HERBACEOUS SPECIES OF CONTRASTED ECOLOGY. , 1987, The New phytologist.

[24]  L. Saker,et al.  Nutrient Supply and the Growth of the Seminal Root System in Barley I. THE EFFECT OF NITRATE CONCENTRATION ON THE GROWTH OF AXES AND LATERALS , 1973 .

[25]  E. Hewitt Sand and Water Culture Methods Used in the Study of Plant Nutrition , 1966 .

[26]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Plant Succession: Life History and Competition , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[27]  M. J. Chadwick,et al.  Experimental Investigations into the Mineral Nutrition of Several Grass Species: IV. Nitrogen Level , 1964 .

[28]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  RESPONSES OF PLANTS FROM THREE SUCCESSIONAL COMMUNITIES TO A NUTRIENT GRADIENT , 1982 .

[29]  D. Goldberg,et al.  Competitive effect and response in four annual plants , 1987 .

[30]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  Competition and relative yield: estimation and interpretation at different densities and under various nutrient concentrations using Silybum marianum and Cirsium vulgare , 1988 .

[31]  R. Sharitz,et al.  Population Dynamics of Two Competing Annual Plant Species , 1973 .

[32]  T. R. E. Southwood,et al.  Tactics, strategies and templets* , 1988 .

[33]  C. Raper,et al.  Proliferation of maize (Zea mays L.) roots in response to localized supply of nitrate. , 1989, Journal of experimental botany.