Designing for Collaborative Infrastructuring

'Infrastructuring' as a concept draws attention to the way in which a designed artefact or system is not the end of the development process. Rather, technology development takes place up to, and including, its successful establishment in an associated body of practices. This places emphasis upon the role of practitioners as designers of their own practice environments. While the activities of professional technology development have been reasonably well discussed and conceptualized, activities that practitioners perform to make things work for them are less acknowledged as a systematic contribution to the successful establishment of the use of IT. This paper considers in particular the so-called 'point of infrastructuring': the moment at which practitioners become aware of opportunities to (re-)design their infrastructures, usually initiated by breakdowns or the recognition of potential innovations and reconsideration of current infrastructural use. From this point onwards, end users themselves may start configuring, tailoring or developing new conventions until a point has been reached in which a new technology usage has been successfully established. However, points of infrastructuring do not only provoke end-user driven in-situ design (or 'infrastructuring') activities. They also evoke so-called 'resonance activities'. These encompass all of the observations and communications that attend upon a point of infrastructure as it becomes visible within a work environment. Examination of resonance activities can be a starting point for a better understanding of the practitioner's activities beyond single infrastructural changes, providing a way of highlighting the relationship between different points of infrastructuring. How to capture and understand resonance activities and how to design technological support for them is still an open question. Based on previous work outlined in the literature and an empirical study that looked at collaborative appropriation activities (the most important aspect of infrastructuring) during 3D printing processes, we outline the concept of sociable technologies as a technological approach for capturing and supporting resonance activities and thus enabling infrastructuring activities more broadly.

[1]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Aspects of Everyday Design: Resourcefulness, Adaptation, and Emergence , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[2]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[3]  J.Christopher Jones Continuous design and redesign , 1983 .

[4]  Helena Karasti,et al.  Artful infrastructuring in two cases of community PD , 2004, PDC 04.

[5]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Gardeners and gurus: patterns of cooperation among CAD users , 1992, CHI.

[6]  Thomas Ludwig,et al.  Towards sociable technologies: an empirical study on designing appropriation infrastructures for 3D printing , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[7]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Developing Information Infrastructure: The Tension Between Standardization and Flexibility , 1996 .

[8]  John Stanislav Sadar,et al.  3D scanning and printing as a new medium for creativity in product design , 2011 .

[9]  Ole Hanseth,et al.  Designing Work Oriented Infrastructures , 2001, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[10]  Andrew Clement,et al.  Looking for the designers: Transforming the ‘invisible’ infrastructure of computerised office work , 1993, AI & SOCIETY.

[11]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  End-user modifiability in design environments , 1990, CHI '90.

[12]  Fahri Yetim,et al.  Fostering Continuous User Participation by Embedding a Communication Support Tool in User Interfaces , 2012 .

[13]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Appropriation Infrastructure: Supporting the Design of Usages , 2009, IS-EUD.

[14]  Walter Buhr,et al.  What is infrastructure , 2003 .

[15]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  An Afterword to ‘Infrastructuring and Collaborative Design’ , 2018, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[16]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  A spiral model of software development and enhancement , 1986, Computer.

[17]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Component-based tailorability: Enabling highly flexible software applications , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[18]  Birger Sevaldson,et al.  GIGA-Mapping: Visualisation for complexity and systems thinking in design , 2011, Nordes 2011: Making Design Matter.

[19]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[20]  T.L.J. Ferris,et al.  Participatory IT Design: Designing for Business and Workplace Realities , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[21]  Gerhard Schmidt,et al.  Out of Scandinavia: Alternative Approaches to Software Design and System Development , 1989, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[22]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  The turn to practice in HCI: towards a research agenda , 2014, CHI.

[23]  Volkmar Pipek,et al.  Fostering user-developer collaboration with infrastructure probes , 2008, CHASE.

[24]  Volker Wulf,et al.  A groupware's life , 1999, ECSCW.

[25]  Jennie Carroll,et al.  Completing design in use: closing the appropriation cycle , 2004, ECIS.

[26]  Marko Becker Handbook Of New Media Social Shaping And Consequences Of Icts , 2016 .

[27]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Domain-oriented design environments , 1992, Proceedings of the Seventh Knowledge-Based Software Engineering Conference.

[28]  Michael Twidale,et al.  Infrastructures from the bottom-up and the top-down: can they meet in the middle? , 2008, PDC.

[29]  Andrew S. Tanenbaum,et al.  Computer networks, 4th Edition , 2002 .

[30]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  Participatory IT Design: Designing for Business and Workplace Realities , 2004 .

[31]  Wendy March,et al.  Designing technology for community appropriation , 2005, CHI EA '05.

[32]  Yannick Prié,et al.  DIAM: towards a model for describing appropriation processes through the evolution of digital artifacts , 2012, DIS '12.

[33]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  User-tailorable systems: pressing the issues with buttons , 1990, CHI '90.

[34]  James Paul Dourish,et al.  Open implementation and flexibility in CSCW toolkits , 1996 .

[35]  Ina Wagner,et al.  Making things work: dimensions of configurability as appropriation work , 2006, CSCW '06.

[36]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[37]  Mark W. Newman,et al.  The infrastructure problem in HCI , 2010, CHI.

[38]  Austin Henderson,et al.  There's No Place Like Home: Continuing Design in Use , 1992, Design at Work.

[39]  Jacki O'Neill,et al.  Representations Can Be Good Enough , 2005, ECSCW.

[40]  Gunnar Stevens,et al.  Supporting the Collaborative Appropriation of an Open Software Ecosystem , 2011, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[41]  Paul Dourish,et al.  The human infrastructure of cyberinfrastructure , 2006, CSCW '06.

[42]  HENRY LIEBERMAN,et al.  End-User Development: An Emerging Paradigm , 2006, End User Development.

[43]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Design at Work , 1992 .

[44]  Elena Parmiggiani,et al.  The Digital Coral: Infrastructuring Environmental Monitoring , 2015, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[45]  Henry Lieberman,et al.  End-User Development , 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[46]  Helena Karasti,et al.  Infrastructuring for the long-term: ecological information management , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[47]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  From Artefacts to Infrastructures , 2013, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[48]  J. Orr,et al.  Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. , 1997 .

[49]  Volkmar Pipek,et al.  From tailoring to appropriation support: Negotiating groupware usage , 2005 .

[50]  Giuseppe Di Battista,et al.  26 Computer Networks , 2004 .

[51]  Alan J. Dix,et al.  Designing for appropriation , 2007, BCS HCI.

[52]  Margaret M. Burnett,et al.  End-User Software Engineering and Why it Matters , 2010, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[53]  Reimut Jochimsen,et al.  Theorie der Infrastruktur : Grundlagen der marktwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung , 1966 .

[54]  Thomas Ludwig,et al.  3D Printers as Sociable Technologies , 2017, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[55]  Margaret Burnett,et al.  End-User Development , 2013, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[56]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[57]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  Participation in design things , 2008, PDC.

[58]  Volkmar Pipek,et al.  Supporting Collaborative Tailoring , 2006, End User Development.

[59]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Meta-design: design for designers , 2000, DIS '00.

[60]  Per-Anders Hillgren,et al.  Participatory design and "democratizing innovation" , 2010, PDC '10.

[61]  Alexander Boden,et al.  Workplace warriors: identifying team practices of appropriation in software ecosystems , 2011, CHASE '11.

[62]  John Bowers,et al.  The work to make a network work: studying CSCW in action , 1994, CSCW '94.

[63]  S. L. Star,et al.  How to Infrastructure , 2002 .

[64]  Christopher A. Le Dantec,et al.  Community historians: scaffolding community engagement through culture and heritage , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[65]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Participatory design: the third space in HCI , 2002 .

[66]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Patterns of sharing customizable software , 1990, CSCW '90.

[67]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Infrastructuring: Toward an Integrated Perspective on the Design and Use of Information Technology , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[68]  Dieter Senghaas,et al.  Friedrich List, Das nationale System der politischen Ökonomie, Stuttgart/Tübingen 1841 , 2007 .

[69]  Rémi Barraquand Designing Sociable Technologies , 2012 .

[70]  Paul Dourish,et al.  The Appropriation of Interactive Technologies: Some Lessons from Placeless Documents , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[71]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[72]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  The resourcefulness of everyday design , 2007, C&C '07.

[73]  Claus Bossen,et al.  Infrastructuring, collaboration and evolving socio-material practices of changing our world , 2014, PDC '14.

[74]  Simon Holland,et al.  Kolab: appropriation & improvisation in mobile tangible collaborative interaction , 2012, DIS '12.

[75]  Toni Robertson,et al.  Shoppers and Tailors: Participative Practices in Small Australian Design Companies , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).