Impact of Preoperative Corneal Curvature on the Outcome of Penetrating Keratoplasty in Keratoconus

Purpose. To assess the impact of the patient's preoperative corneal curvature on the refractive outcome after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in keratoconus before and after suture removal. Patients and Methods. In this retrospective cross-sectional clinical study, 236 keratoconus patients (mean age 37 ± 11 years) were divided into four groups based on their preoperative keratometric (K-) readings: group 1, <50 diopters (D) (n = 24); group 2, <60 D (n = 52); group 3, ≥60 D (n = 101); group 4, irregular corneal shape with unmeasurable K-reading (n = 59). An 8.0/8.1-mm central round PK was performed using 193 nm Meditec excimer laser trephination along metal masks with eight “orientation teeth/notches.” A 16-bite double running cross-stitch suture was applied in all cases. Postoperative examinations were performed before removal of the first suture (ie, 12 months) and after removal of the second suture (ie, 18 months). The outcome measures included central power (C-power), keratometric astigmatism (AST), surface regularity index (SRI), surface asymmetry index (SAI), spherical equivalent (SEQ), refractive cylinder (Cyl), and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). In addition, the regularity of Zeiss keratometry mires was classified semiquantitatively (0, regular; 1, mildly irregular; 2, moderately irregular; 3, unmeasurable). Results. Before/after suture removal, median C-power was 43.4/43.3 D; AST was 3.0/3.0 D; SAI was 0.6/0.6; SRI was 0.9/0.9; Cyl was 2.5/2.5 D; BCVA was 0.7/0.7. After suture removal, the percentage of regular keratometry mires increased from 37% to 61%. Comparisons among the four groups revealed no significant differences for any parameters tested either before or after suture removal. Conclusions. With laser trephination and a double running suture, the refractive and visual outcome of PK for keratoconus seems to be independent on the patient's preoperative corneal curvature or irregularity. Suture removal did not effect an increase of corneal astigmatism but did increase the proportion of regular keratometry mires. Thus, our policy of not performing PK in keratoconus eyes before the patient becomes contact lens intolerant is well supported.

[1]  B. Seitz,et al.  Long-Term Follow-Up of Intraocular Pressure After Penetrating Keratoplasty for Keratoconus and Fuchs' Dystrophy: Comparison of Mechanical and Excimer Laser Trephination , 2002, Cornea.

[2]  H. Geggel.  Technique to Minimize Asymmetric Suture Placement During Penetrating Keratoplasty , 2002, Cornea.

[3]  B. Seitz,et al.  Berechnung yon Lokalisation und Dimension der reellen Pupille bei Keratokonus mittels Raytracing von Hornhauttopographiedaten , 1999 .

[4]  A. Behrens,et al.  “Orientation teeth” in non-mechanical laser corneal trephination for penetrating keratoplasty: 2.94 μm Er:YAGv 193 nm ArF excimer laser , 1999, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  G. Hanselmayer,et al.  Three-year clinical outcome after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus with the guided trephine system. , 1999, American journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  B. Seitz,et al.  Nonmechanical corneal trephination with the excimer laser improves outcome after penetrating keratoplasty. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[7]  M. Busin,et al.  Different suturing techniques variously affect the regularity of postkeratoplasty astigmatism. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[8]  B. Seitz,et al.  Transplantatverkippung nach perforierender Keratoplastik - Vergleich zwischen nichtmechanischer Trepanation mittels Excimerlaser und Motortrepanation , 1998 .

[9]  A Langenbucher,et al.  Graft decentration in penetrating keratoplasty: nonmechanical trephination with the excimer laser (193 nm) versus the motor trephine. , 1998, Ophthalmic surgery and lasers.

[10]  U. Stenevi,et al.  The results of penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. , 2009, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[11]  R. Steinert,et al.  Comparison of suture-in and suture-out postkeratoplasty astigmatism with single running suture or combined running and interrupted sutures. , 1996, American journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  B. Seitz,et al.  Regularität der Hornhauttopographie nach perforierender Keratoplastik : Vergleich zwischen nichtmechanischer (Excimer-Laser-193 nm) und mechanischer Trepanation , 1996 .

[13]  S. Tuft,et al.  Long‐Term Refraction and Keratometry After Penetrating Keratoplasty for Keratoconus , 1995, Cornea.

[14]  S. Gore,et al.  Corneal graft survival and visual outcome. A multicenter Study. Corneal Transplant Follow-up Study Collaborators. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[15]  G. Lang,et al.  [193 excimer laser trepanation in perforating keratoplasty. Report of 70 patients]. , 1993, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.

[16]  M. Javadi,et al.  A Comparison Between Donor-Recipient Corneal Size and Its Effect on the Ultimate Refractive Error Induced in Keratoconus , 1993, Cornea.

[17]  B. Seitz,et al.  Limbus-parallel keratotomies and compression sutures in excessive astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. , 1993, German journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  R. D. Stulting,et al.  Changes in keratometric astigmatism after suture removal more than one year after penetrating keratoplasty. , 1993, Ophthalmology.

[19]  S. Tuft,et al.  Myopia following penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. , 1992, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  F. Price.  Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus , 1992, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  R. Marks,et al.  Graft survival in four common groups of patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty. , 1991, Ophthalmology.

[22]  S. Wilson,et al.  Effect of recipient-donor trephine size disparity on refractive error in keratoconus. , 1989, Ophthalmology.

[23]  L. Girard.  The effect of suture removal on postkeratoplasty astigmatism. , 1989, American journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  D. Musch,et al.  The effect of removing running sutures on astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. , 1988, Archives of ophthalmology.

[25]  M. Lawless,et al.  Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. , 1987, Cornea.

[26]  L. Wilson,et al.  Postoperative astigmatism after central vs eccentric penetrating keratoplasties. , 1985, American journal of ophthalmology.

[27]  C. Swinger,et al.  Selective positioning of the donor cornea in penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: postoperative astigmatism. , 1984, Cornea.

[28]  R. Olson.  Modulation of Postkeratoplasty Astigmatism by Surgical and Suturing Techniques , 1983, International ophthalmology clinics.

[29]  H. Kaufman.  Astigmatism after keratoplasty--possible cause and method of prevention. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.

[30]  P. Paglen,et al.  The prognosis for keratoplasty in keratoconus. , 1982, Ophthalmology.

[31]  P. Binder,et al.  Disparate diameter grafting. Astigmatism, intraocular pressure, and visual acuity. , 1981, Ophthalmology.

[32]  E. Perlman,et al.  An analysis and interpretation of refractive errors after penetrating keratoplasty. , 1981, Ophthalmology.