The impact of exchange programs on the integration of the hostgroup into the self-concept

Two studies analyzed the impact of international exchange programs on students' identity development. More precisely, the authors predict that exchange students integrate the host society (hostgroup) into their self-concept during an exchange year. Study 1 found a stronger social identification with the hostgroup and higher commitment for former exchange students than for future exchange students. Study 2 replicated the difference between former and future exchange students and found in addition that both former and future exchange students had a stronger identification and commitment in comparison to a control group that did neither take part in nor apply for an exchange program. Moreover, in this study the inclusion of the hostgroup into the self-concept was assessed via a response time paradigm. The results indicate that former and future exchange students have a stronger association between the self and the hostgroup than the control sample, but no difference between former and future exchange students was found. The results provide evidence for the impact of interest in and actual intensive intergroup contact on students' self-concept. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Self‐categorisation, commitment to the group and group self‐esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity , 1999 .

[2]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  An In-Group Becomes Part of the Self: Response Time Evidence , 1996 .

[3]  W. Mcguire,et al.  Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one's ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. , 1978, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  James Jaccard,et al.  Arbitrary metrics in psychology. , 2006, The American psychologist.

[5]  E. Finkel,et al.  Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity reduction through the anticipation of future interaction. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  David L. Sam,et al.  Immigrant Youth: Acculturation, Identity, and Adaptation , 2006 .

[7]  Rupert Brown,et al.  The relationship between acculturation strategies, relative fit and intergroup relations: immigrant-majority relations in Germany , 2002 .

[8]  C. Stangor,et al.  Influence of student exchange on national stereotypes, attitudes and perceived group variability , 1996 .

[9]  J. Phinney,et al.  “Unpackaging” Acculturation , 2002 .

[10]  Maykel Verkuyten,et al.  National (Dis)identification and Ethnic and Religious Identity: A Study Among Turkish-Dutch Muslims , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[11]  Olivier Corneille,et al.  On the Role of Familiarity with Units of Measurement in Categorical Accentuation: Tajfel and Wilkes (1963) Revisited and Replicated , 2002, Psychological science.

[12]  P. Vedder,et al.  Ethnic Identity, Immigration, and Well‐Being: An Interactional Perspective , 2001 .

[13]  J. Phinney,et al.  Variations in Bicultural Identification Among African American and Mexican American Adolescents , 1997 .

[14]  Dirk Wentura,et al.  Underlying processes in the implicit association test: dissociating salience from associations. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  T. Devos.  Implicit bicultural identity among Mexican American and Asian American college students. , 2006, Cultural diversity & ethnic minority psychology.

[16]  K. Deaux.  A Nation of Immigrants: Living Our Legacy , 2006 .

[17]  A. Aron,et al.  Close Relationships as Including Other in the Self , 1991 .

[18]  J. Phinney,et al.  Positive intergroup attitudes: The role of ethnic identity , 2007 .

[19]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Overlapping Mental Representations of Self, In-Group, and Partner: Further Response Time Evidence and a Connectionist Model , 1999 .

[20]  Stephen C. Wright,et al.  Including others in the self , 2004 .

[21]  Thomas Staufenbiel,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Entwicklung und erste Validierung eines Meßinstruments. , 2000 .

[22]  J. D. Vorauer.  An information search model of evaluative concerns in intergroup interaction. , 2006, Psychological review.

[23]  Boris Egloff,et al.  Becoming Friends by Chance , 2008, Psychological science.

[24]  R. Spears,et al.  Constructing a minority group identity out of shared rejection: The case of international students , 2003 .

[25]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Classification and quantitative judgement. , 1963, British journal of psychology.

[26]  Günter W. Maier,et al.  Die affektive Bindung an das Unternehmen: Psychometrische Überprüfung einer deutschsprachigen Fassung des Organizational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ) von Porter und Smith (1970) , 2002 .

[27]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Overlapping Mental Representations of Self and In-Group: Reaction Time Evidence and Its Relationship with Explicit Measures of Group Identification☆ , 2000 .

[29]  Stephen C. Wright,et al.  The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. , 1997 .

[30]  K. Epstude,et al.  Overlapping Mental Representations of Self, Ingroup, and Outgroup: Unraveling Self-Stereotyping and Self-Anchoring , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[31]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Who wants to know? The effect of audience on identity expression among minority group members. , 2003, The British journal of social psychology.

[32]  John P. Meyer,et al.  The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization , 1990 .

[33]  J. Phinney.  Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: review of research. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.