Clinical Results After Cervical Laminoplasty: Differences Due to the Duration of Wearing a Cervical Collar

Objective: This investigation assessed the relationship between the duration of wearing a cervical collar and clinical results in patients undergoing laminoplasty. Methods: Twenty-five patients with cervical myelopathy who underwent laminoplasty and wore a cervical collar for 8 weeks postoperatively were followed for an average of 27.3 months. A second group of 26 patients who underwent laminoplasty and wore a cervical collar for 4 weeks was followed for an average of 32.8 months. Results: In both groups, neurologic recovery rate and range of motion on lateral cervical radiographs were longitudinally compared with those obtained preoperatively. There was no significant difference in neurologic recovery between the two groups. In patients who wore the cervical collar for 4 weeks, the total range of the cervical spine was better maintained, especially the extension range of the cervical spine, compared with that in the patients who wore the cervical collar for 8 weeks. Conclusions: It is speculated that early removal of the cervical collar prevents contracture of the facet joint and postoperative atrophy and dysfunction of the extensor musculature of the cervical spine.

[1]  C. Edwards,et al.  Corpectomy Versus Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy: An Independent Matched-Cohort Analysis , 2002, Spine.

[2]  C. Edwards,et al.  Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy and Fusion for Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy: An Independent Matched Cohort Analysis , 2001, Spine.

[3]  K. Takeshita,et al.  Long-Term Results of Double-Door Laminoplasty for Cervical Stenotic Myelopathy , 2001, Spine.

[4]  C. Edwards,et al.  T-Saw Laminoplasty for the Management of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Clinical and Radiographic Outcome , 2000, Spine.

[5]  R. Ogawa,et al.  Cervical curvature after laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy--involvement of yellow ligament, semispinalis cervicis muscle, and nuchal ligament. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[6]  M. O’Brien,et al.  A Novel Technique for Laminoplasty Augmentation of Spinal Canal Area Using Titanium Miniplate Stabilization: A Computerized Morphometric Analysis , 1996, Spine.

[7]  H. Shingu,et al.  Long-term follow-up of cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by canal-expansive laminoplasty. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  K. Hirabayashi,et al.  Long-term follow-up studies of open-door expansive laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. , 1994, Spine.

[9]  K. Otani,et al.  Expansive Laminoplasty with Reattachment of Spinous Process and Extensor Musculature for Cervical Myelopathy , 1992, Spine.

[10]  K. Ohmori,et al.  Critical analysis of extensive cervical laminectomy. , 1989, Neurosurgery.

[11]  H. Tsuji,et al.  Technical Improvements and Results of Laminoplasty for Compressive Myelopathy in the Cervical Spine , 1985, Spine.

[12]  K Satomi,et al.  Operative Results and Postoperative Progression of Ossification Among Patients With Ossification of Cervical Posterior Longitudinal Ligament , 1981, Spine.

[13]  C. Lind,et al.  CG-clip expansive open-door laminoplasty: a technical note. , 1999, British journal of neurosurgery.