Non Accusative Objects

En aquest article proposem una analisi asimetrica de la legitimacio de cas en que, d’una banda, l’arquitectura funcional del sistema verbal nomes legitima, com a maxim, un SD, i, de l’altra, nomes un cert tipus de SD requereix una legitimacio formal. La nostra proposta explica, sense complicacions addicionals, els problemes classics que afecten la sintaxi de les construccions amb Marcatge Diferenciat de l’Objecte (MDO) i amb elevacio d’objecte, aixi com els efectes de la restriccio de persona i cas, tant en espanyol com en altres llengues. Tambe analitzem les consequencies i els reptes que la nostra proposta planteja per explicar el comportament dels clitics en dialectes laistes en contextos en que els dos arguments interns semblen legitimar-se de maneres formalment independents: un mitjancant el MDO i l’altre gracies a un clitic de datiu. En aquest sentit, demostrem que aquest clitic datiu no estableix cap relacio de concordanca, sino que es un determinant que s’incorpora, com passa amb els clitics acusatius de tercera persona (Ormazabal i Romero 2013a).

[1]  F. M. Marín,et al.  Estudios sobre el pronombre , 1981 .

[2]  M. Mithun The evolution of noun incorporation , 1984 .

[3]  G. Bossong Differential Object Marking in Romance and Beyond , 1991 .

[4]  Elena Anagnostopoulou,et al.  Object Shift and Specificity: Evidence from ko-phrases in Hindi , 1996 .

[5]  F. Roca Morfemas objetivos y determinantes: los clíticos del español , 1996 .

[6]  Nicholas Evans The syntax and semantics of body part incorporation in Mayali , 1996 .

[7]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  On the Structural Positions of Themes and Goals , 1996 .

[8]  Željko Bošković,et al.  The Syntax of Nonfinite Complementation: An Economy Approach , 1997 .

[9]  Inés Fernández-Ordóñez Leísmo, laísmo y loísmo , 1999 .

[10]  Amaya Mendikoetxea,et al.  Construcciones con "se": medias, pasivas e impersonales , 1999 .

[11]  Alec Marantz,et al.  Case and licensing , 2000 .

[12]  Le marquage différentiel de l'objet , 2001 .

[13]  Gabi Danon,et al.  Syntactic definiteness in the grammar of Modern Hebrew , 2001 .

[14]  Paolo Acquaviva IRISH PREPOSITIONAL AGREEMENT AND AUTONOMOUS MORPHOLOGY , 2003 .

[15]  E. Woolford,et al.  Lexical Case, Inherent Case, and Argument Structure , 2006, Linguistic Inquiry.

[16]  Gabi Danon,et al.  Caseless nominals and the projection of DP , 2006 .

[17]  Miguel Rodriguez-Mondonedo,et al.  The syntax of objects: Agree and differential object marking , 2007 .

[18]  H. de Hoop,et al.  Semantic aspects of differential object marking , 2007 .

[19]  eljko Bokovi On the Locality and Motivation of Move and Agree: An Even More Minimal Theory , 2007, Linguistic Inquiry.

[20]  Juan Romero,et al.  The Object Agreement Constraint , 2007 .

[21]  Howard Lasnik,et al.  On the Development of Case Theory: Triumphs and Challenges , 2008 .

[22]  M. Leonetti Specificity in Clitic Doubling and in Differential Object Marking , 2008 .

[23]  J. Ormazabal,et al.  The Derivation of Dative Alternations , 2010 .

[24]  Esther Torrego,et al.  Variability in the Case Patterns of Causative Formation in Romance and Its Implications , 2010, Linguistic Inquiry.

[25]  Nikki Adams,et al.  The Zulu ditransitive verb phrase , 2010 .

[26]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  Two modalities of case assignment: case in Sakha , 2010 .

[27]  M. Řezáč 1 Case and intervention in DP licensing: Evidence from ECM+DOC , 2010 .

[28]  Jeremy Hartman,et al.  (Non-)intervention in A-movement: Some cross-constructional and cross-linguistic considerations , 2011 .

[29]  Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson,et al.  Minimalist C/case , 2012, Linguistic Inquiry.

[30]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  On the Relationship of Object Agreement and Accusative Case: Evidence from Amharic , 2012, Linguistic Inquiry.

[31]  Milan Rezac,et al.  Case and Licensing: Evidence from ECM+DOC , 2013, Linguistic Inquiry.

[32]  J. Ormazabal,et al.  Object clitics, agreement and dialectal variation , 2013 .