Ising-like agent-based technology diffusion model: adoption patterns vs. seeding strategies

The well-known Ising model used in statistical physics was adapted to a social dynamics context to simulate the adoption of a technological innovation. The model explicitly combines (a) an individual’s perception of the advantages of an innovation and (b) social influence from members of the decision-maker’s social network. The micro-level adoption dynamics are embedded into an agent-based model that allows exploration of macro-level patterns of technology diffusion throughout systems with different configurations (number and distributions of early adopters, social network topologies). In the present work we carry out many numerical simulations. We find that when the gap between the individual’s perception of the options is high, the adoption speed increases if the dispersion of early adopters grows. Another test was based on changing the network topology by means of stochastic connections to a common opinion reference (hub), which resulted in an increment in the adoption speed. Finally, we performed a simulation of competition between options for both regular and small world networks.

[1]  Marco Janssen,et al.  Simulating Market Dynamics: Interactions between Consumer Psychology and Social Networks , 2003, Artificial Life.

[2]  Eitan Muller,et al.  The role of seeding in multi-market entry , 2005 .

[3]  Matthieu De Beule,et al.  Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness , 1999 .

[4]  N. Pimlott Learning from the neighbours. , 2012, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[5]  Sanjeev Goyal,et al.  Learning from Neighbors , 1995 .

[6]  F. Schweitzer,et al.  Modelling collective opinion formation by means of active Brownian particles , 1999, adap-org/9911005.

[7]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Internet: Diameter of the World-Wide Web , 1999, Nature.

[8]  Charles M. Macal,et al.  Managing Business Complexity: Discovering Strategic Solutions with Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation , 2007 .

[9]  H. Haken,et al.  Synergetics , 1988, IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine.

[10]  J. Goldenberg,et al.  The Role of Hubs in the Adoption Process , 2009 .

[11]  Charles M. Macal,et al.  Managing Business Complexity: Discovering Strategic Solutions with Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation , 2007 .

[12]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  The Web as a Graph: Measurements, Models, and Methods , 1999, COCOON.

[13]  Hermann Haken,et al.  Synergetics: An Introduction , 1983 .

[14]  Gérard Weisbuch,et al.  Dynamical Aspects in the Adoption of Agri-Environmental Measures , 1999, Adv. Complex Syst..

[15]  M. Janssen,et al.  Multi-Agent Systems for the Simulation of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: A Review , 2003 .

[16]  G. Huse Individual‐based Modeling and Ecology , 2008 .

[17]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Epidemic dynamics in finite size scale-free networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  A. Grabowskia,et al.  Ising-based model of opinion formation in a complex network of interpersonal interactions , 2006 .

[19]  Tammo H. A. Bijmolt,et al.  Targeting and timing promotional activities : An agent-based model for the takeoff of new products , 2007 .

[20]  Daniel Z. Sui,et al.  Effect of Small-World Networks on Epidemic Propagation and Intervention , 2009 .

[21]  M. Macy,et al.  FROM FACTORS TO ACTORS: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling , 2002 .

[22]  E. Ising Beitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus , 1925 .

[23]  S. Galam Rational group decision making: A random field Ising model at T = 0 , 1997, cond-mat/9702163.

[24]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[25]  Andrzej Grabowski Opinion formation in a social network: The role of human activity , 2009 .

[26]  Raj Kumar Pan,et al.  The Small-world of Modular Networks , 2008 .

[27]  R. Axelrod The Complexity of Cooperation , 2011 .

[28]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of Networks , 2009 .

[29]  Marco Janssen,et al.  Diffusion dynamics in small-world networks with heterogeneous consumers , 2007, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[30]  Brent A. Zenobia,et al.  Artificial markets: A review and assessment of a new venue for innovation research , 2009 .

[31]  G. Erard Weisbuch,et al.  Dynamical Aspects in the Adoption of Agri-environmental Measures , 2002 .

[32]  A. Pekalski,et al.  Ising model on a small world network. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[33]  Jie Wu,et al.  Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness , 2003 .