Offsite Manufacturing Construction: A Big Opportunity for Housing Delivery in Nigeria

The problem of housing delivery is of great concern in many countries of the world. This problem is more predominant in developing countries and Nigeria is not an exception. In Nigeria, this challenge has been magnified as a result of myriad of issues, e.g. high population growth rate, shortage of necessary skills, disintegrated supply chain etc. Seminal literature has proven that offsite manufacturing (OSM) can help improve housing delivery efforts both in terms of quantity and quality. The purpose of the research was to investigate the current housing delivery problems in Nigeria and evaluate the feasibility of adopting OSM. To achieve this, the study conducted substantial literature review to explore the benefits of OSM, identify the problems of housing delivery in Nigeria and explore different dimensions and the issues that can be associated with using OSM in Nigeria. The results revealed that there are a good number of benefits promised by OSM; notable among these benefits are: less wastage on site, faster construction time, quality improvement and reduction in wet trades. Moreover, some of the problems of housing delivery in Nigeria identified included: skills shortage, reliance on conventional construction techniques, slow pace of construction, and low quality of housing. The study also showed that adaptation of OSM has been quite useful in other countries facing the similar issues of housing shortage, e.g. Malaysia. As such, it is argued that OSM can improve skills shortages, improve the speed of construction, improve the overall quality of housing and help eliminate wet trades. For the problems of housing delivery to be tackled in Nigeria, it is important to undertake additional research to identify the benefits, barriers and context-specific ways of adopting OSM in Nigeria.

[1]  C. A. Ayedun,et al.  ISSUES AND CHALLENGES MILITATING AGAINST SUSTAINABILITY OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROVISION IN NIGERIA , 2011 .

[2]  Ron Wakefield,et al.  Drivers, constraints and the future of offsite manufacture in Australia , 2007 .

[3]  Ron Wakefield,et al.  Concrete prefabricated housing via advances in systems technologies: development of a technology roadmap , 2010 .

[4]  A. Sivam,et al.  An approach to improved housing delivery in large cities of less developed countries , 2001 .

[5]  L. Ogunshakin,et al.  Public housing delivery in Nigeria: problems and challenges , 2005 .

[6]  Martin Rudberg,et al.  Classification of production systems for industrialized building: a production strategy perspective , 2014 .

[7]  Alistair G.F. Gibb,et al.  Re-engineering through pre-assembly: client expectations and drivers , 2003 .

[8]  J. B. Emmanuel “Housing Quality” To the Low Income Housing Producers in Ogbere, Ibadan, Nigeria , 2012 .

[9]  J.S. Goulding,et al.  New offsite production and business models in construction: priorities for the future research agenda , 2015 .

[10]  Alistair G.F. Gibb,et al.  Off-site production: evaluating the drivers and constrains , 2004 .

[11]  N. Mansfield,et al.  Causes of delay and cost overruns in Nigerian construction projects , 1994 .

[12]  J. K. Ukwayi,et al.  An Assessment of Housing Delivery in Nigeria: Federal Mortgage Bank Scenario , 2012 .

[13]  Ryan E. Smith,et al.  History of Prefabrication: A Cultural Survey , 2009 .

[14]  Na Lu,et al.  The Current Use of Offsite Construction Techniques in the United States Construction Industry , 2009 .

[15]  Mohd Hanizun Hanafi,et al.  Perspective of Malaysian Industrialized Building System on the Modern Method of Construction , 2010 .

[16]  S. Austin,et al.  Never waste a good crisis: a review of progress since Rethinking Construction and thoughts for our future , 2009 .

[17]  Chi Sun Poon,et al.  Design issues of using prefabrication in Hong Kong building construction , 2010 .

[18]  R. Reed,et al.  Factors impeding the offsite production of housing construction in China: an investigation of current practice , 2014 .

[19]  M. Taylor A definition and valuation of the UK offsite construction sector , 2010 .

[20]  Jack Steven Goulding,et al.  Promoting Off-Site Construction: Future Challenges and Opportunities , 2012 .

[21]  M. Motiar Rahman,et al.  Barriers of Implementing Modern Methods of Construction , 2014 .

[22]  Chi Sun Poon,et al.  Sustainable construction aspects of using prefabrication in dense urban environment: a Hong Kong case study , 2008 .

[23]  Alistair G.F. Gibb,et al.  Future opportunities for offsite in the UK , 2007 .

[24]  Olusola Oladapo Makinde Housing delivery system, need and demand , 2014, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[25]  Wafaa Nadim,et al.  Offsite Production in the UK: The Way Forward?, A UK Construction Industry Perspective , 2010 .

[26]  A. Dainty,et al.  Resolving the UK construction skills crisis: a critical perspective on the research and policy agenda , 2007 .

[27]  Anil Sawhney,et al.  State of offsite construction in India-drivers and barriers , 2012 .

[28]  Malik M.A. Khalfan,et al.  Off-Site Construction of Apartment Buildings , 2013 .

[29]  Vincent I Ogu,et al.  Housing policy in Nigeria: towards enablement of private housing development , 2001 .

[30]  Abiodun Olukayode Olotuah,et al.  Architectural Education and Housing Provision in Nigeria , 2009 .

[31]  M. Arif,et al.  Making a case for offsite construction in China , 2010 .

[32]  Mike Riley,et al.  Towards sustainable construction: promotion and best practices , 2009 .